Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Congress in turmoil over Air Force tanker decision
Reuters ^ | Fri Feb 29, 2008 9:50pm EST | Kevin Drawbaugh

Posted on 02/29/2008 7:13:12 PM PST by Paleo Conservative

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 161-165 next last
To: Cold Heat

I don’t mean this rudely .. good for you but I could care less about your stock. America first.


21 posted on 02/29/2008 7:34:06 PM PST by CindyDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Paleo Conservative
Given the tone of the article, can one conclude that the muslims and Chinese are unhappy with this development?

Additional reporting by Andrea Shalal-Esa, editing by Richard Chang

22 posted on 02/29/2008 7:34:14 PM PST by PAR35
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DennisR
This is why Boeing was not selected:
Ex-Boeing CFO pleads guilty in Air Force procurement scandal

The former chief financial officer for Boeing pleaded guilty in federal court Monday to illegally helping Darleen Druyun, the Air Force's former No. 2 procurement official, land a lucrative job with the company.

Michael Sears, 57, who along with Druyun was fired by Boeing in late 2003, pleaded guilty to a single count of aiding and abetting illegal employment negotiations in United States District Court in Alexandria, Va. Sears, who will be sentenced in January, could receive up to five years in prison.

"Michael Sears' secret employment negotiations with a senior Air Force official struck at the heart of the integrity of the multibillion-dollar defense acquisition process. Conflict-of-interest rules are important and protect the public interests," U.S. Attorney Paul McNulty said in a prepared statement.

"This is the largest corruption case by defense contractors our nation has seen in decades," said Keith Ashdown, vice president of policy at Taxpayers for Common Sense, a Washington-based interest group. "Sears' plea confirms that Boeing knowingly set out to make billions off of the illegal acts of a few."

In court papers, Sears admitted meeting with Druyun to discuss employment with Boeing while she was still serving as one of the Air Force's top contracting officials. In that job, Druyun held enormous influence over the service's nearly $30 billion annual procurement budget, and was key negotiator in a controversial deal for the Air Force to lease tanker aircraft from Boeing.

Druyun admitted in federal court last month to favoring Boeing in at least four contract negotiations, including the tanker deal. She said she felt indebted to the company for giving her daughter, her son-in-law and herself jobs. Druyun was sentenced to nine months in prison.

Last week, the Pentagon announced it would review all contracts Druyun oversaw from 1993 to 2002 as the Air Force's principal deputy assistant for acquisition and management. The Defense Science Board also will conduct a review of the military's acquisition systems to determine if there are sufficient checks and balances in place. Sears admitted to not only meeting with Druyun while she oversaw Boeing contracts, but attempting to conceal those meetings from the Pentagon and federal investigators. Court documents show top Boeing's executives discussed recruiting Druyun at an Oct. 2002 meeting.

"They were very interested in Druyun's considerable talent and experience. They also discussed the fact that they did not want her to join Lockheed Martin, Boeing's primary competitor," court documents stated.

On Oct. 17, 2002, Sears and Druyun secretly met in a private conference room at Orlando International Airport, where Druyun had flown to attend an industry conference, to discuss her future plans. Druyun told Sears she had reached an agreement to accept a job with Lockheed Martin, but said she would consider an offer from Boeing, court documents showed.

The documents indicated that at the meeting, Druyun and Sears also discussed cost, delivery and schedule delays on the Air Force's F/A-22 fighter aircraft program, on which Boeing played a role as a subcontractor.

Druyun and Sears would later agree via e-mail to tell investigators they had not discussed her potential employment until early November, after Druyun had signed a letter recusing herself from all Boeing matters before the Air Force.

In subsequent e-mails and phone conversations, Sears implored Druyun to "hang tough" as investigators began questioning her about how she got a $250,000 a year job managing Boeing's missile defense programs.


23 posted on 02/29/2008 7:34:14 PM PST by FreedomCalls (Texas: "We close at five.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: CindyDawg

Build it in China and make everybody happy.


24 posted on 02/29/2008 7:34:54 PM PST by B4Ranch ("In politics, nothing happens by accident. If it happens, you can bet it was planned that way." FDR)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: CindyDawg

Congress sold American workers out for one dinky plant in Alabama-Sessions is a ....I can’t say it. This is a real slap in the face. Of course, a Republican the Alabama Senator was on Lou Dobbs defending this awful decision.


25 posted on 02/29/2008 7:35:26 PM PST by nyconse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: NoLibZone; Paleo Conservative

>>>Best Bid being awarded to a foreign nation on a security project is the equivalent to Bernard Shaw saying he needed to remain impartial with the info he had while at the El Rahseedd hotel.

Really over the top there. It’s not a spy plane. It’s a tanker, a flying gas can. The Airbus proposal carries more fuel so can refuel more aircraft and stay on station longer then the Boeing. Keeping the warplanes in the air is “security” too.


26 posted on 02/29/2008 7:35:45 PM PST by tlb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: FreedomCalls
The Chauchat, such a great weapon.

Pinfire revolvers will be our next official sidearms.

27 posted on 02/29/2008 7:37:13 PM PST by Octar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: B4Ranch
nah...I think China will get the missile contract
28 posted on 02/29/2008 7:37:59 PM PST by CindyDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: FreedomCalls

LOL, Yep just wonderful. You would have better results using it as a club :)


29 posted on 02/29/2008 7:38:59 PM PST by WildcatClan (Real Marxism you can believe in. Yes, we can. Si, se puede.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: tlb

The Airbus proposal carries more fuel so can refuel more aircraft and stay on station longer then the Boeing. Keeping the warplanes in the air is “security” too.

Then build two of them and employ even more US Citizens.

Or have the US manufacturer resubmit with a plane that can hold the adnl 20%.


30 posted on 02/29/2008 7:40:35 PM PST by NoLibZone (If the Clinton years were so great for the libs- why is Obama doing so well?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: TaMoDee

And it’s likely that the KC-45 won’t be using the CF6-80 variant now used, but likely a modified GENx engine. This will lower fuel burn, which improves the range over the current A330-200F.


31 posted on 02/29/2008 7:41:42 PM PST by RayChuang88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: FlingWingFlyer

I’m from Washington, and I’m kinda in your state of mind (although we’re moving soon to Oregon.) If I had stayed here I was going to make it my life’s goal to UNSEAT PATTY MURRAY!!!! Maybe, maybe, this will happen.


32 posted on 02/29/2008 7:41:47 PM PST by goodnesswins (Being Challenged Builds Character; Being Coddled Destroys Character)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Octar

Maybe next is switching to Roamainan AKs.


33 posted on 02/29/2008 7:42:09 PM PST by NoLibZone (If the Clinton years were so great for the libs- why is Obama doing so well?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Paleo Conservative

We should have seen what Iran could offer.

Fewer Muslims there than in France.


34 posted on 02/29/2008 7:43:46 PM PST by NoLibZone (If the Clinton years were so great for the libs- why is Obama doing so well?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Paleo Conservative
Just damn!

Who was that Senator that brags that he put the kibosh on the Boeing deal?

Was it John Kerry who was brought up in France?

Oh yeah, that guy that was a war prisoner and says he's a conservative.

35 posted on 02/29/2008 7:45:35 PM PST by chuckles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RayChuang88
And it’s likely that the KC-45 won’t be using the CF6-80 variant now used, but likely a modified GENx engine. This will lower fuel burn, which improves the range over the current A330-200F.

But wouldn't that increase the burden on the very busy GENx line? Perhaps it could use an engine very similar to the bleed air version developed for the 747-800.

36 posted on 02/29/2008 7:46:52 PM PST by Paleo Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: tlb

This plane will be built in France and flown to Alabama to have the decals put on. That tells you everything you need to know about who is really building this plane.

Can you imagine a few years down the road when another Chirac is in charge of France and tells the US “no more tanker spare parts until you withdraw from ...”


37 posted on 02/29/2008 7:47:15 PM PST by blue state conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: NoLibZone
Maybe next is switching to Roamainan AKs.

Or maybe the .43 Egyptian.

38 posted on 02/29/2008 7:48:37 PM PST by Octar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Paleo Conservative

Who the hell are these morons making these decisions?


39 posted on 02/29/2008 7:54:07 PM PST by pissant (THE Conservative party: www.falconparty.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Octar

Again fewer Muzzies there than in France!


40 posted on 02/29/2008 7:55:43 PM PST by NoLibZone (If the Clinton years were so great for the libs- why is Obama doing so well?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 161-165 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson