Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Congress in turmoil over Air Force tanker decision
Reuters ^ | Fri Feb 29, 2008 9:50pm EST | Kevin Drawbaugh

Posted on 02/29/2008 7:13:12 PM PST by Paleo Conservative

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - A U.S. Air Force decision awarding a $35 billion aircraft contract to a team including the European parent of Airbus landed like a bomb in Congress on Friday, drawing howls of protest from lawmakers aligned with the loser, America's Boeing Co.

The Congressional delegation from the Seattle area said they were "outraged." Kansas Republican Rep. Todd Tiahrt vowed to seek a review of the decision "at the highest levels of the Pentagon and Congress" in hopes of reversing it.

Boeing has big facilities in both Seattle and Wichita, which stood to gain from the long-term project to build up to 179 aerial refueling tankers. Although Boeing was favored to win the contract, the Air Force awarded it to a partnership between Northrop Grumman and Europe's EADS.

Conventional wisdom was running so strongly against Northrop-EADS in some corners of Capitol Hill that Texas Sen. Kay Bailey Hutchison's office issued a statement late on Friday declaring Boeing the winner. It was swiftly retracted.

Lawmakers from Alabama, where Northrop and EADS plan to do some tanker work, were effusive in praising the Air Force.

"I thought all along that the Northrop Grumman-EADS proposal was the best," Sen. Richard Shelby, an Alabama Republican, told reporters. He said the contract would bring nearly 7,000 jobs to the state.

On the disappointment of Chicago-based Boeing's allies, Shelby said he understood. "If Boeing had won this contract ... I would have been concerned about it."

As for Tiahrt's vow to seek a review, Shelby said, "The Pentagon and the Air Force have made their decision and I think it was for the right reasons and I'll stand by that."

The decision was sure to result in a debate, with a formal protest also possible, said defense consultant Jim McAleese.

The tanker deal will give EADS a huge boost in the U.S. defense market, making it the second biggest foreign supplier behind Britain's BAE Systems, analysts said.

"We are so very excited about having the opportunity to help the Air Force acquire the most modern and capable refueling tanker -- a tanker assembled in America -- by Americans," said Alabama Republican Rep. Jo Bonner.

Bonner represents Mobile, Alabama, where assembly work on the aircraft will be done, although it will largely be constructed in France at facilities of EADS' unit Airbus.

Airbus, with large facilities in Toulouse, is Boeing's arch-rival in the global commercial airliner business.

Wichita's Rep. Tiahrt said, "I am deeply troubled by the Air Force's decision to award the KC-X tanker to a French company that has never built a tanker in its history.

"We should have an American tanker built by an American company with American workers. I cannot believe we would create French jobs in place of Kansas jobs."

Tiahrt said he will seek to have the decision reviewed by both the Pentagon and Congress. "At the end of this laborious process, I hope the Air Force reverses its decision."

Washington Senators Patty Murray and Maria Cantwell, both Democrats, along with six other lawmakers from the state said in a joint statement: "We are outraged that this decision taps European Airbus and its foreign workers to provide a tanker to our American military.

"We will be asking tough questions about the decision to outsource this contract. We look forward to hearing the Air Force's justification."

(Additional reporting by Andrea Shalal-Esa, editing by Richard Chang)



TOPICS: Business/Economy; Government
KEYWORDS: 110th; aerospace; airbus; aviation; boeing; defensecontractors; defensespending; dod; northropgrumman; tanker; usaf
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 161-165 next last

1 posted on 02/29/2008 7:13:14 PM PST by Paleo Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Paleo Conservative

I really , really like that congress is upset but why can’t we build our own? I’m concerned about security in France also.


2 posted on 02/29/2008 7:18:22 PM PST by CindyDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Paleo Conservative

Pratt and Whitney is sure upset by the decision. I’m in Connecticut and they are all over the radio talking about they build a better engine for the tanker.


3 posted on 02/29/2008 7:20:05 PM PST by mojo114
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CindyDawg

Yeah....and everything in metric.


4 posted on 02/29/2008 7:20:55 PM PST by spokeshave (Hey GOP...NO money till border closed and criminal illegals deported)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Paleo Conservative

I really don’t like this either but since it has caused Murray and Cantwell to go into hysterics, I think I’ll lean back, eat some popcorn through my smirk and sit this one out.


5 posted on 02/29/2008 7:22:20 PM PST by FlingWingFlyer (In November, we're going to be able to elect politicians who say they can change the weather. YAY!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CindyDawg

The arsenal of democracy is under new management.


6 posted on 02/29/2008 7:22:51 PM PST by cripplecreek (Voting CONSERVATIVE in memory of 5 children killed by illegals 2/17/08 and 2/19/ 08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: CindyDawg

It’s Washington’s loss and Alabama’s gain. I’m from WA :(


7 posted on 02/29/2008 7:24:20 PM PST by steve86 (Acerbic by nature, not nurtureā„¢)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Paleo Conservative

Everyone should call/email every Congressional representative you have (I already have) to protest this foolish decision. It is extremely offensive that my tax money is being given to the parent of Airbus. However, it is even more offensive that we are allowing a foreign country to supply the airframe for a defensive project. It is not only offensive, it is extremely, absolutely stupid!

President Bush, where are you? You are the Commander in Chief, and you need to quash this idiocy! American defensive programs need to be built by Americans! Because you cannot predict who our enemies are going to be in 20 years!


8 posted on 02/29/2008 7:24:31 PM PST by DennisR (Look around - God gives countless clues that He does, indeed, exist.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CindyDawg

Both Aircraft are a mesh of foreign and domestic parts, Cindy. I like Boeing best for safety and reliability in commercial aircraft, but I see nothing wrong with this. Airbus holds a lot more fuel, has GE engines and will bring 7000 jobs to Alabama.

I am not sure security in France will weigh too heavily into this. I certainly understand why there would be concerns though, but I think the Pentagon just picked the best plane, or at least thought they did.


9 posted on 02/29/2008 7:25:42 PM PST by WildcatClan (Real Marxism you can believe in. Yes, we can. Si, se puede.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Paleo Conservative

Whoot! Way to go Northrop Grumman!


10 posted on 02/29/2008 7:25:59 PM PST by chaos_5 (Vote for change - ObamaNation 2008!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Paleo Conservative

I would like to know why they did this. If it’s payback to congress for sitting on bills and not supporting the military, I can support this. I wish they would have picked a small American company though.


11 posted on 02/29/2008 7:26:07 PM PST by CindyDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Paleo Conservative
US manufacturer's need to get their sh*t together and build the better cargo aircraft....this is BS....stop whining and find out why we got our asses handed to us....find the problem and fix it....or is it politicians/military who have been bought off by foreign interests (Clinton's)....
12 posted on 02/29/2008 7:26:27 PM PST by homeguard ((Charlie Don't Surf!))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: microgood; liberallarry; cmsgop; shaggy eel; RayChuang88; Larry Lucido; namsman; jpsb; decimon; ...

If you want on or off this aerospace ping list, please contact Paleo Conservative or phantomworker by Freep mail.

Here are some other related threads.

EADS/Northrop upsets Boeing in Air Force tanker competition — analyst
Seattle Times ^ | February 29, 2008 | Dominic Gates

Posted on 02/29/2008 3:53:16 PM CST by skeptoid




Northrop/EADS wins [Air Force] tanker contract
The Mobile Press-Register ^ | 02/29/2008 | George Talbot

Posted on 02/29/2008 3:54:02 PM CST by Radio Free Tuscaloosa


13 posted on 02/29/2008 7:27:03 PM PST by Paleo Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Paleo Conservative

Hope Congress un funds the Air force for a few years.
And makes them all wear Berets and knickers.

Best Bid being awarded to a foreign nation on a security project is the equivalent to Bernard Shaw saying he needed to remain impartial with the info he had while at the El Rahseedd hotel.

If this happens I may need to vote for Osama to slow the money being spent offshore for future military projects.


14 posted on 02/29/2008 7:27:08 PM PST by NoLibZone (If the Clinton years were so great for the libs- why is Obama doing so well?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Paleo Conservative

And to think it all began with a mess of porridge...


15 posted on 02/29/2008 7:29:15 PM PST by Old Professer (The critic writes with rapier pen, dips it twice, and writes again.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Paleo Conservative

I’m not outraged. My stock went way up today, and my retirement fund is tied to Northrop.


16 posted on 02/29/2008 7:29:34 PM PST by Cold Heat (NO! (you can infer any meaning you choose))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WildcatClan
Ok, thanks. I think I’ll just get a handful of the above poster’s popcorn and enjoy the show too.
17 posted on 02/29/2008 7:30:34 PM PST by CindyDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: spokeshave

It’s all in metric now.
The tanker will have GE Engines, and all the refueling and navaids will be installed in a plant to be built in Georiga,
USA. 4000 pers employed.

USAF wanted an AC Tanker with 2X capacity of KC-135 —
Boeing didn’t come up with the required AC as spec’d.


18 posted on 02/29/2008 7:31:15 PM PST by TaMoDee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: WildcatClan

The Chauchat, such a great weapon.

19 posted on 02/29/2008 7:31:18 PM PST by FreedomCalls (Texas: "We close at five.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Paleo Conservative

Alabama won this contract fair and square. Boeing was having production problems on other contracts. More importantly, the Northrup-EADS tanker will hold 3 times as much fuel and can supply fuel in flight in two different ways. It is clearly the better plane for the Air Force. And it’s being manufacured in Sweet Home Alabama!!


20 posted on 02/29/2008 7:31:43 PM PST by CWW (Make the most of the loss, and regroup for 2008!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 161-165 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson