Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Right Before Our Eyes (Pulsar started emitting powerful bursts of x-rays like a magnetar.)
ScienceNOW Daily News ^ | 21 February 2008 | Phil Berardelli

Posted on 02/23/2008 9:05:41 PM PST by neverdem

Enlarge ImagePicture of neutron star

Growing pains.
This artist's conception shows a neutron star known as a magnetar crackling with extremely powerful magnetic activity.

Credit: Gregg Dinderman/Sky & Telescope

"When you hear hoofbeats," the old saying goes, "think horse, not zebra." But what if your horse suddenly grows zebra stripes? That's the predicament astronomers faced when a star they were observing--a rapidly spinning remnant of a supernova called a pulsar--started emitting powerful bursts of x-rays considered the hallmark of a much-rarer object called a magnetar. The finding strongly suggests that pulsars, also known as neutron stars, and magnetars are linked and paves the way for a better understanding of stellar evolution.

Pulsars are the dense cores left over after stars of a certain mass explode into supernovae. Weighing as much or more than the sun but only as big as asteroids, they can rotate tens or even hundreds of times a second (versus once a day for Earth). Sky surveys have identified about 1800 pulsars within the Milky Way, most of which emit pulsing radio signals that rise and fall as the pulsars spin.

The stripe-changing pulsar, named PSR J1846-0258, lies about 20,000 light-years away in the constellation Aquila. A team of researchers from NASA and elsewhere was observing it using the Rossi X-ray Timing Explorer (RXTE) spacecraft when the star suddenly erupted in a blast of x-rays. The display, reported online today in Science, made PSR J1846-0258 a candidate for being a magnetar--a type of neutron star with an enormously powerful magnetic field. Magnetars, so rare that only a dozen or so have been discovered, routinely emit high-energy x-rays and even gamma rays. But no one had ever observed a pulsar emitting such bursts.

"The bursts were completely unexpected," says astrophysicist and lead author Fotis Gavriil of NASA's Goddard Space Flight Center in Greenbelt, Maryland. Because PSR J1846-0258 is a very young pulsar (a mere 1000 years old) and because its magnetic field strength is considerably lower than those from bona fide magnetars, Gavriil says, the researchers suspect it is still evolving. He says the discovery raises important questions about the two types of stars: Do pulsars behave like magnetars only periodically and then revert? Did all magnetars originate as pulsars? "We really need to follow this source, and others like it, to answer these questions," he says.

Astrophysicist Duncan Lorimer of West Virginia University in Morgantown calls the discovery "fantastic." A decade ago, he says, very little was known about any connections between pulsars and magnetars. Now, Lorimer says, the evolutionary connections between the two are strengthening, and observations like this one will help "elucidate our understanding of what happens to a young neutron star after its birth in a supernova." And astrophysicist Robert Duncan of the University of Texas, Austin, calls the findings "fascinating and important," because they represent the first time that magnetically generated x-rays have been seen coming from a rotationally driven pulsar. Duncan, who developed the theoretical behavior of magnetars in 1992, says he is not so sure the object will turn out to be a magnetar, but "neutron stars are constantly surprising scientists, so future observations … will certainly be interesting."

Related sites



TOPICS: Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: astronomy; catastrophism; magnetar; pulsar; xplanets
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-49 next last

1 posted on 02/23/2008 9:05:44 PM PST by neverdem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: neverdem

I love it when they are wrong. It should make them rethink the models but they usually just make fictitious things up as a response.


2 posted on 02/23/2008 9:17:58 PM PST by kinoxi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
interesting.. wonder what all changes to current theory this'll entail

"...artist's conception shows a neutron star known as a magnetar crackling with extremely powerful magnetic activity."

Oh, so that's what that was.. I never knew that magnetic energy crackles along field lines that resemble Bohr Model electron orbitals... or that a neutron star looks uncannily like a computer rendering of the Sun. A pity so many "artist's renderings" nowadays apparently are no longer done by a real artist that studies the subject aforehand. My guess is the task is just delegated to an undergraduate graphics arts intern as an afterthought most of the time.



3 posted on 02/23/2008 9:29:16 PM PST by verum ago (The Iranian Space Agency: set phasers to jihad!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kinoxi
It should make them rethink the models but they usually just make fictitious things up as a response.

yeah... the problem with things this theoretical is it's too easy for them to just ad hoc up a little change and then ask for more funding and a shiny new telescope to 'verify' it.
4 posted on 02/23/2008 9:32:14 PM PST by verum ago (The Iranian Space Agency: set phasers to jihad!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: verum ago

I’m genuinely curious.

You and kinoxi obviously have a deep-seated contempt for scientists (and even the process of science, perhaps.) Why? What drives it?


5 posted on 02/23/2008 9:35:20 PM PST by Strategerist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Strategerist
....they (have/don't have) faith.
6 posted on 02/23/2008 9:42:08 PM PST by skinkinthegrass (just b/c your paranoid, doesn't mean "they" aren't out to get you...our hopes were dashed by CINOs :)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

bmflr


7 posted on 02/23/2008 9:49:51 PM PST by Kevmo (SURFRINAGWIASS : Shut Up RINOs. Free Republic is not a GOP Website. It’s a SOCON Site.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: El Gato; Ernest_at_the_Beach; Robert A. Cook, PE; lepton; LadyDoc; jb6; tiamat; PGalt; Dianna; ...
A Sweet Success for Embryonic Stem Cells marginal proof of principle in a chimeric mouse

Scientists Measure What It Takes to Push a Single Atom

FReepmail me if you want on or off my health and science ping list.

8 posted on 02/23/2008 9:55:24 PM PST by neverdem (I have to hope for a brokered GOP Convention. It can't get any worse.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

So, how high are the mountains on a black hole? 8<)


9 posted on 02/23/2008 10:05:29 PM PST by Robert A Cook PE (I can only donate monthly, but Hillary's ABBCNNBCBS continue to lie every day!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

Well, as a frequent visitor and proponent of the Hanford LIGO facility, I am looking forward to seeing potential gravity wave data (and processing it via Einstein@Home).


10 posted on 02/23/2008 10:10:40 PM PST by steve86 (Acerbic by nature, not nurture™)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Strategerist; skinkinthegrass
don't have faith... lol, considering ad hoc fixes are how creationists maintain their theories to deal with evidence against them.

I was merely being humorously (to some) cynical about the price tags on many scientific endeavors and pieces of equipment, and about theoretical science— that which consists only of theory and observation, as opposed to experimental science— that which can falsified directly via experiment and not by the happy coincidence of something doing something that contradicts theory while we happen to be observing it. Which isn't to say that theoretical science is not without logic or utility.

One would think that FReepers would be used to cynicism by now, but that's only a supposition. And I could say that skinkinthegrass 'obviously' has 'a deep seated contempt' for the religious, but I think I'll refrain from doing so in case that he/she may have been cynically humorous in their remark.
11 posted on 02/23/2008 10:24:59 PM PST by verum ago (The Iranian Space Agency: set phasers to jihad!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: verum ago; Strategerist
don't have faith... LOL
...considering ad hoc fixes are how creationists maintain their theories to deal with evidence against them
...cynically humorous in their remark....

nail/head..correct both counts...more than both of us can count / imagine. 8^/
12 posted on 02/23/2008 10:53:23 PM PST by skinkinthegrass (just b/c your paranoid, doesn't mean "they" aren't out to get you...our hopes were dashed by CINOs :)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: verum ago
yeah... the problem with things this theoretical is it's too easy for them to just ad hoc up a little change and then ask for more funding and a shiny new telescope to 'verify' it.

That is way science works. You make an observation, especially an unexpected one. Then you postulate an explanation. From that explanation, you make a prediction. If your science is an experimental one, your prediction should the outcome of an experiment, but if, like astronomy/astrophysics, it's an observational one, they you have to make more observations to look for the effect you predict. If you find it, your explanation, ie. your theory, is verified, always subject to other observations tending to disprove it.

13 posted on 02/23/2008 11:12:46 PM PST by El Gato ("The Second Amendment is the RESET button of the United States Constitution." -- Doug McKay)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: El Gato

I’ve been feeling a little odd lately and now I know why:

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v200/pisky/alienpixyhat.jpg

Must be my hat!


14 posted on 02/24/2008 12:16:36 AM PST by Nick Thimmesch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: El Gato

Oh. I didn’t realize that by setting out to prove one’s explanation of an anomalous explanation by observing its effects was proper scientific conduct. But I guess that properly shoulding the outcome of an experiment verifies a prediction such that it’s underlying explanation must be true, and the burden of proof is upon falsification (should they tend to do so).


15 posted on 02/24/2008 12:50:07 AM PST by verum ago (The Iranian Space Agency: set phasers to jihad!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
Weighing as much or more than the sun but only as big as asteroids, they can rotate tens or even hundreds of times a second (versus once a day for Earth).

IF the sun rotates, is it "exactly" in phase with the Earth? And does the sun's axis of rotation coincide with the axis of the Earth's orbit?

Cheers!

16 posted on 02/24/2008 4:52:49 AM PST by grey_whiskers (The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change without notice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: El Gato
Or you see if the observations are thought to be the result of a particular interaction which can be modeled and tested here on Earth.

Kinda hard to fit an entire star into a test tube...

Cheers!

17 posted on 02/24/2008 4:55:26 AM PST by grey_whiskers (The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change without notice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

Here is great movie of the Crab Nebula pulsar using Hubble and Chandra satellite time-lapse pictures. Quite remarkable if you are in to this kind of thing.

http://chandra.harvard.edu/photo/2002/0052/combinedmovie.mpg


18 posted on 02/24/2008 5:04:45 AM PST by JustDoItAlways
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem; 75thOVI; AFPhys; aimhigh; Alice in Wonderland; AndrewC; aristotleman; Avoiding_Sulla; ...
This artist's conception shows a neutron star known as a magnetar crackling with extremely powerful magnetic activity
Thanks neverdem.
 
Catastrophism
· join · view topics · view or post blog · bookmark · post new topic ·

19 posted on 02/24/2008 7:36:40 AM PST by SunkenCiv (https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/___________________Profile updated Tuesday, February 19, 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam

The Cycle of Cosmic Catastrophes: Flood, Fire, and Famine in the History of Civilization The Cycle of Cosmic Catastrophes:
Flood, Fire, and Famine
in the History of Civilization

by Richard Firestone,
Allen West, and
Simon Warwick-Smith


20 posted on 02/24/2008 7:37:12 AM PST by SunkenCiv (https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/___________________Profile updated Tuesday, February 19, 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-49 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson