Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Hillary Defies Judge’s Mandate, That She Must Testify in LA COURT HOUSE!
PeterPaul Blog ^ | 2/22/08 | PeterPaul Blog

Posted on 02/22/2008 6:34:42 AM PST by OPS4

There was an extraordinary development at a hearing today in Los Angeles Superior Court in the Paul v Clinton et al civil fraud case against Bill and Hillary Clinton, prosecuted by Hillary’s largest donor Peter Paul. When Judge Munoz finally allowed Paul to commence discovery after a three year “appellate” hiatus, Hillary Clinton’s attorney declared that none of Hillary Clinton’s lawyers would accept a deposition subpoena on Hillary’s behalf.

Hillary will be dodging process servers while she is campaigning for President of the United States around the nation!! The sworn testimony Paul is entitled to take from Hillary as a former defendant and material witness that the Judge specifically stated he will not allow to be denied, is now being officially thwarted by Senator Hillary R Clinton!

Hillary has now made history again in her contempt for the Rule of Law. She has become the first US Senator and candidate for president of the United States on record to declare she will be effectively dodging process servers to avoid testifying truthfully about fraudulent actions that she has never personally denied in the sworn declaration she filed in the case! http://www.peterfpaul.com/ ABC 20/20 Shows Hillary Clinton is the “Liar” In Illegalities Exposed By Top Donor Peter Paul ABC 20/20 Corroborates Peter Paul Against Hillary ClintonSeven years ago Peter Paul began whistleblowing to the government and alerting the media of numerous illegalities committed by Hillary and Bill Clinton in order to win Hillary’s first election to public office. The multi-million dollar donor to Hillary’s Senate campaign that caused Hillary’s finance director to be indicted and tried in May, 2005, for hiding his contributions, and whose complaint to the FEC resulted in a finding that Hillary’s campaign broke the law resulting in the only FEC fine imposed against Hillary’s campaign, will begin the discovery process leading to a trial in Los Angeles later this year of the Clintons and others for destroying Paul’s public company. http://www.peterfpaul.com/2008/02/16/abc-2020-shows-hillary-clinton-is-the-liar-in-illegalities-exposed-by-top-donor-peter-paul/


TOPICS: Front Page News; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: clinton; crimes; elections; hillary; hillaryscandals; losangeles; paulvclinton; stophillary
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 141-143 next last
To: ArrogantBustard

The process should be served by the (elected) Sheriff, personally, escorted by his entire force of deputies. In uniform, with cameras.

&&&
What!? Don’t you think those men have families they have to worry about leaving behind in the wake of multiple Arkancides?


61 posted on 02/22/2008 7:43:20 AM PST by Bigg Red (Position Wanted: Experienced Republican voter looking for a party that is actually conservative.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: SeaHawkFan
Nobody has a monopoly on good ideas ...

The best timing would be to wait until after the D Convention (at which I expect The Beast to steal the nomination from The Obamination) ...

62 posted on 02/22/2008 7:44:29 AM PST by ArrogantBustard (Western Civilization is Aborting, Buggering, and Contracepting itself out of existence.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: stayathomemom
Maybe Rick Lazio can do it

LOL

63 posted on 02/22/2008 7:45:05 AM PST by ditto h
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: knarf

This is not a Federal case, it is a civil case, filed in the State of California. The California Code of Civil Procedure will preside over this case, not the FRCP, for serving a subpoena on her.

Pleading Link:

http://www.hillcap.org/pp_complaint_022504_njw.pdf

Codes 1985-1997. Subpoena

http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/cgi-bin/displaycode?section=ccp&group=01001-02000&file=1985-1997


64 posted on 02/22/2008 7:45:38 AM PST by dallascsr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Old Retired Army Guy

I don’t know about California procedure, but everywhere in the civilized world it’s not necessary to serve a subpoena upon a party represented by counsel. Notice to the attorney is wholly sufficient.


65 posted on 02/22/2008 7:45:57 AM PST by Mr. Lucky
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Old Retired Army Guy
She has Secret Service Protection as the former first lady and candidate. The Process Server wouldn’t be able to get within 30 feet of her.

Picture this. She's at the debate, and Obama walks across the podium and serves her, live on national TV. Would the SS stop him? Does her SS detail LIKE her enough to WANT to stop a piece of paper from getting to her? Could a SS agent be charged with obstruction of justice for preventing a piece of paper, which is not a physical threat, from getting to her?

66 posted on 02/22/2008 7:47:28 AM PST by PapaBear3625
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: SeaHawkFan

Just breaking! Fox reporting that a motorcycle cop in Hilary’s Texas motorcade took a spill - in a pool of blood!

I do not plan to get within 3,000 miles of that woman - she is evil.


67 posted on 02/22/2008 7:47:42 AM PST by sodpoodle (Despair - man's surrender. Laughter - God's redemption.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland

Rodham Clinton supporters awaited her arrival to a small Oak Cliff parking lot in the Friday morning chill, clutching their signs, drinking coffee and clustering under a handful of pole-mounted heaters.
The Democratic presidential hopeful was scheduled to speak at 9 a.m. at a get-out-the-vote rally at the Bank Tower parking lot at 400 S. Zang Blvd. Then she was to travel to downtown Fort Worth to speak at 11 a.m. at the corner of First and Main streets.


68 posted on 02/22/2008 7:49:02 AM PST by OPS4 (Ops4 God Bless America!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: OPS4

http://www.wfaa.com/sharedcontent/dws/news/localnews/stories/022308dnpolclinton.192473d8.html


69 posted on 02/22/2008 7:49:20 AM PST by OPS4 (Ops4 God Bless America!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: dallascsr

If she has appeared in the lawsuit then she does not need to be personally served with a deposition subpoena?


70 posted on 02/22/2008 7:49:37 AM PST by BenLurkin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: PapaBear3625

Unless the Judge specifically ordered the subpoena to be served by a process server or marshal, Obama, could, indeed, serve her. Wouldn’t the look on her face make the front pages?


71 posted on 02/22/2008 7:50:12 AM PST by dallascsr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: John_Galt518
Make several campaign contributions in the process servers name

Good idea but it should be a Chinese process server and the contributions should be in yuans, many many yuans. Would be irresistible.
72 posted on 02/22/2008 7:50:47 AM PST by TheLawyerFormerlyKnownAsAl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: stayathomemom

“Maybe Rick Lazio can do it.”

How about Dog the Bounty Hunter?


73 posted on 02/22/2008 7:52:12 AM PST by Polyxene (For where God built a church, there the Devil would also build a chapel - Martin Luther)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: dallascsr
I surmise then, that all it has to do is request an alternate date due to it's campaigning for president ... then .. (assuming it's selected! ) .. claim executive priveledge, or some such nonsense and continue destroying the nation.
74 posted on 02/22/2008 7:52:12 AM PST by knarf (I say things that are true ... I have no proof ... but they're true.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: OPS4

Okay, what FReeper wants to make history and serve her in Texas or Ohio? I want it on film. You don’t have to physically hand it to her. As long as you yell that you have legal service for her and she sees it, you can drop it and she has been served.


75 posted on 02/22/2008 7:53:05 AM PST by doug from upland (Stopping Hillary should be a FreeRepublic Manhattan Project)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Bogus Pachysandra

The story about the Paul/Clinton case is all over You Tube....just call it up and watch!


76 posted on 02/22/2008 7:54:18 AM PST by cousair
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: cousair

And of Course not one MSM has carried anything about it except 20/20.

Wheres Hannity and Limbaugh?

Hillary Defies Judge’s Mandate That She Must Testify in Paul v Clinton By Demanding A Process Server Must “Catch” and Serve Her In Person!
http://www.peterfpaul.com/


77 posted on 02/22/2008 7:55:52 AM PST by OPS4 (Ops4 God Bless America!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: OPS4

As long as she stays out of California she is probably untouchable.


78 posted on 02/22/2008 7:55:55 AM PST by Old Professer (The critic writes with rapier pen, dips it twice, and writes again.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AmericaUnited; PubliusMM
And 99.9% of her secret service agents hate her guts. I’m sure they would help in this matter.

Leaving 0.1% of the USSS who are her loyal Praetorian Guard.

You don't think She Who Must Not Be Named cannot demand who is and who's not on Her detail? There are Clinton apparatchiks in every department, and that includes DHS (who now runs the Detail).

If I were a current candidate for President, I would NOT trust the USSS detail. I'd get my own posse to watch my back. Take Barack Husayn ibn Mahomet, for example: he could easily get some Nation of Islam muscle at any event he asks for.

79 posted on 02/22/2008 7:56:54 AM PST by Old Sarge (CTHULHU '08 - I won't settle for a lesser evil any longer!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland

another nail in the coffin of self important ambition which the darkside compells Hillary to think is for our good. Good riddance...soon.


80 posted on 02/22/2008 7:56:55 AM PST by fabian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 141-143 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson