Posted on 02/22/2008 6:34:42 AM PST by OPS4
There was an extraordinary development at a hearing today in Los Angeles Superior Court in the Paul v Clinton et al civil fraud case against Bill and Hillary Clinton, prosecuted by Hillary’s largest donor Peter Paul. When Judge Munoz finally allowed Paul to commence discovery after a three year “appellate” hiatus, Hillary Clinton’s attorney declared that none of Hillary Clinton’s lawyers would accept a deposition subpoena on Hillary’s behalf.
Hillary will be dodging process servers while she is campaigning for President of the United States around the nation!! The sworn testimony Paul is entitled to take from Hillary as a former defendant and material witness that the Judge specifically stated he will not allow to be denied, is now being officially thwarted by Senator Hillary R Clinton!
Hillary has now made history again in her contempt for the Rule of Law. She has become the first US Senator and candidate for president of the United States on record to declare she will be effectively dodging process servers to avoid testifying truthfully about fraudulent actions that she has never personally denied in the sworn declaration she filed in the case! http://www.peterfpaul.com/ ABC 20/20 Shows Hillary Clinton is the “Liar” In Illegalities Exposed By Top Donor Peter Paul ABC 20/20 Corroborates Peter Paul Against Hillary ClintonSeven years ago Peter Paul began whistleblowing to the government and alerting the media of numerous illegalities committed by Hillary and Bill Clinton in order to win Hillary’s first election to public office. The multi-million dollar donor to Hillary’s Senate campaign that caused Hillary’s finance director to be indicted and tried in May, 2005, for hiding his contributions, and whose complaint to the FEC resulted in a finding that Hillary’s campaign broke the law resulting in the only FEC fine imposed against Hillary’s campaign, will begin the discovery process leading to a trial in Los Angeles later this year of the Clintons and others for destroying Paul’s public company. http://www.peterfpaul.com/2008/02/16/abc-2020-shows-hillary-clinton-is-the-liar-in-illegalities-exposed-by-top-donor-peter-paul/
‘cept maybe at a rope line... with a blank envelope and a marker.. “Please can I get your autograph??? You’ve been served.”
Get the cops from 'Law & Order' to serve the subpoena or to make the arrest. They always do it in very public places to embarrass the hell out of them.
What I'm looking for is the penalty for the actor when the server KNOWS the actor is knowingly and willfully dodging being served. (not very legalese ... but you get the picture)
Maybe not.....these folks spend their working lives serving people who do not want to be served. They can be very inventive.
Good luck to them!
The b***h has it coming.
Why, hell, if they wouldn’t indict her for murder, tampering with evidence, illegal cattle futures trading, grand theft, witness tampering, perjury, suborning of perjury, slander, and obstruction of justice, why would she worry about being subpoenaed for a crummy little court appearance . . . Sir Madam Shrillery, Her Royal Thighness, just doesn’t want to go to court . . . so, there! I mean, c’mon!
I would love to see Obama serve her at the beginning of the next debate as they walk toward each other to shake hands at the beginning.
I can fantasize, can't I?
If she is a party to a civil action than she has been served with the complaint and summons and is subject to the jurisdiction of the court and may only needs a notice to appear served on her attorney?
The more he tries to help the cover up and the more the federal election commission helps him, the bigger the scandal gets as the cover up and corruption continue, one of the larger Media Outlets will pick it up, because being complicit in not reporting will eventually cause a public uproar.
I am forwarding this to Drudge, and and then to the Drudge Retort, where Mike Barnicle links up, along wiht other yellow dogs.
We must tempt them with the news and evidence and maybe one of the outlets will feel the need to post the real news, about the Clintons, and the Hollywod Hustle.
Re: Yup! Video every attempt, and put them on Youtube!
I agree. Video them all. Then interview the server for an explanation and put them on YouTube.
Calling Joe Arpaio....
Candy-gram for Mongo
Candy-gram for Mongo
I hate it when I decide not to read the posts before replying. Your solution is the exact same as mine.
Yes, the U.S. Marshall could do this...the $64K is... will they?
I don’t think anyone in the gov’t agencies has the balls to actually enforce this order.
It’s a state court matter, so the US Marshalls cannot band should not get involved.
I take it she isn't a party to the litigation.
If so they need only serve notice of her deposition upon her attorneys of record.
They could serve that by mail.
“I think there is a requirement that the papers actually get into the hands of the target or their representative.”
Not in California. What the judge is going to look at is the Declaration under Penalty of Perjury of the process server, and compare it to what the target says.
An example: Target is dodging service and has a fancy security system at apartment, but does answer phone calls.
Process server approaches front door of target’s apartment. Process server’s accomplice calls target at target’s home phone. Process server hears phone ring and hears target answer it. Target identifies himself to caller — irrespective of whether process server hears the actual name — process server can hear target talking.
Process server knocks on door, says “Mr. X”, I have legal papers for you. I am leaving them at the foot of the door. You have been served”.
Process server and accomplice file declarations under penalty of perjury laying all this out. Service is good even though the process server never even SAW the target.
Judges don’t like service dodgers and they aren’t going to listen to bogus arguments.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.