Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Statement by the founder of Free Republic
Free Republic ^ | March 2004 | Jim Robinson

Posted on 02/20/2008 3:48:31 PM PST by Racehorse

Statement by the founder of Free Republic:

In our continuing fight for freedom, for America and our constitution and against totalitarianism, socialism, tyranny, terrorism, etc., Free Republic stands firmly on the side of right, i.e., the conservative side. Believing that the best defense is a strong offense, we (myself and those whom I'm trying to attract to FR) support the strategy of taking the fight to the enemy as opposed to allowing the enemy the luxury of conducting their attacks on us at home on their terms and on their schedule.

Therefore, we wholeheartedly support the Bush Doctrine of pre-emptive strikes on known terrorist states and organizations that are believed to present a clear threat to our freedom or national security. We support our military, our troops and our Commander-in-Chief and we oppose turning control of our government back over to the liberals and socialists who favor appeasement, weakness, and subserviency. We do not believe in surrendering to the terrorists as France, Germany, Russia and Spain have done and as Kerry, Kennedy, Clinton and the Democrats, et al, are proposing.

As a conservative site, Free Republic is pro-God, pro-life, pro-family, pro-Constitution, pro-Bill of Rights, pro-gun, pro-limited government, pro-private property rights, pro-limited taxes, pro-capitalism, pro-national defense, pro-freedom, and-pro America. We oppose all forms of liberalism, socialism, fascism, pacifism, totalitarianism, anarchism, government enforced atheism, abortionism, feminism, homosexualism, racism, wacko environmentalism, judicial activism, etc. We also oppose the United Nations or any other world government body that may attempt to impose its will or rule over our sovereign nation and sovereign people. We believe in defending our borders, our constitution and our national sovereignty.

Free Republic is private property. It is not a government project, nor is it funded by government or taxpayer money. We are not a publicly owned entity nor are we an IRS tax-free non-profit organization. We pay all applicable taxes on our income. We are not connected to or funded by any political party, news agency, or any other entity. We sell no merchandise, product or service, and we offer no subscriptions or paid memberships. We accept no paid advertising or promotions. We are funded solely by donations (non tax deductible gifts) from our readers and participants.

We aggressively defend our God-given and first amendment guaranteed rights to free speech, free press, free religion, and freedom of association, as well as our constitutional right to control the use and content of our own personal private property. Despite the wailing of the liberal trolls and other doom & gloom naysayers, we feel no compelling need to allow them a platform to promote their repugnant and obnoxious propaganda from our forum. Free Republic is not a liberal debating society. We are conservative activists dedicated to defending our rights, defending our constitution, defending our republic and defending our traditional American way of life.

Our God-given liberty and freedoms are not negotiable.

May God bless and protect our men and women in uniform fighting for our freedom and may God continue to bless America.

Jim Robinson


TOPICS: Announcements; Free Republic; Philosophy
KEYWORDS: adminlectureseries; election; elections; fr; freerepublic
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140141-148 next last
To: eleni121

The problem is that I think I know what you meant, but didn’t say.


121 posted on 02/23/2008 12:40:09 PM PST by Dog Gone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 118 | View Replies]

To: Dog Gone

Judaeo Christian principles get trashed (only ones getting trashed) in the hellish rush to international godless corporatism to the detriment of borders, tradition, beliefs.

That is what I meant. And this president (and McCain) is part of that vicious circle too. I did not believe it at first...but now I do..a gradual and painful realization.


122 posted on 02/23/2008 12:50:49 PM PST by eleni121 (+ En Touto Nika! By this sign conquer! + Constantine the Great)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 121 | View Replies]

To: eleni121

Okay, that’s what I thought. Bush started the war to benefit Halliburton.

Let’s just sell this site to MoveOn.org and get it over with.


123 posted on 02/23/2008 12:54:33 PM PST by Dog Gone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 122 | View Replies]

To: Dog Gone

Bush started the war to benefit Halliburton.


Did I say that? I didn’t see that anywhere in my posting. I did not even mention Iraq. I could have. Oil is a staple to the world’s economy after all. Too bad we couldn’t just say that..that we need to remove the butcher of Baghdad because oil needs to flow. That is not PC enough and one consequence is the Christian community there has all but disappeared.

You need to get past the defensiveness and stop defending the cabal running the show in the belt no matter which party is in power. It’s a complex situation I agree..but beating up our allies and defending tyrants for tha sake of economic corporate interests operating under the guise of privatization does not fool every conservative and does not make things better.


124 posted on 02/23/2008 1:12:16 PM PST by eleni121 (+ En Touto Nika! By this sign conquer! + Constantine the Great)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 123 | View Replies]

To: eleni121
I thought you were responding positively to this statement in #111
To leave the border open while going on an Iraq adventure in the name of the security of our homeland demonstrates that the latter was a bogus reason.
Perhaps you were referring only to the Kosovo part of the comment, although I'd then ask you to explain how our actions in Kosovo are being done in pursuit of corporate interests.
125 posted on 02/23/2008 1:16:44 PM PST by Dog Gone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 124 | View Replies]

To: Dog Gone

Yes Yes and maybe later.

IN the meantime see if you can figure out the answer first. To help you, answer Harris’s questions as posed by Lechter:

“Simplicity. Read Marcus Aurelius. Of each particular thing ask: what is it in itself? What is its nature? What does he do, this connection (man) you seek?”


126 posted on 02/23/2008 2:10:01 PM PST by eleni121 (+ En Touto Nika! By this sign conquer! + Constantine the Great)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 125 | View Replies]

To: eleni121

Sorry, but I don’t want to engage in riddle games with you.

If you do not wish to explain your statements on this forum, then that is your privilege, but I shall weigh them accordingly.


127 posted on 02/23/2008 2:34:31 PM PST by Dog Gone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 126 | View Replies]

To: eleni121; Dog Gone
Oil is a staple to the world’s economy after all. Too bad we couldn’t just say that..that we need to remove the butcher of Baghdad because oil needs to flow. That is not PC enough and one consequence is the Christian community there has all but disappeared.

Trade in general is the life blood of civilization. If you underestimate that, try studying the aftermath of the Roman Empire's fall.

In 2008, free and fair exchange of oil is essential. Pirates, bandits, terrorists, barbarians, tinpot despots, whoever, throughout history past and future represent an existential threat to a basically prosperous way of life.

So we come to the justifications for military action against hopelessly corrupt dictators with almost unlimited resources. To justify invasion as a defensive action against Butchers that will pass WMDs to terrorist networks, is to draw attention to the essential power (over many nations!) that a Saddams holds. If unchecked, at some point the evildoer will kill thousands and millions. Calling attention instead to the inevitable economic ruin would be justification enough.

To wring your hands over the hypocrisy of failing to stress the economic aspect of this necessary type of policing, or to imagine that the Christian community in Iraq would be in fine shape if Saddam were still in power, is to miss the forest for the trees.

128 posted on 02/24/2008 7:13:19 AM PST by NutCrackerBoy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 124 | View Replies]

To: NutCrackerBoy
There is trade and then there is trade.

The kind of trade the neocons are infatuated with is corporate monopolistic trade that respects neither nation nor people.

Any political entity that formulates policy and takes action in order to expand and defend monopolistic corporate goals to the detriment of its own well being and traditions is not worthy of respect.

129 posted on 02/24/2008 9:32:40 AM PST by eleni121 (+ En Touto Nika! By this sign conquer! + Constantine the Great)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 128 | View Replies]

To: RedCell
Jim Robinson for President!
130 posted on 02/24/2008 6:10:47 PM PST by sionnsar (trad-anglican.faithweb.com |Iran Azadi| 5yst3m 0wn3d - it's N0t Y0ur5 (SONY) | UN: Useless Nations)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Racehorse

Jim Robinson, my hero! Well said, Jim!

God’s Blessing be upon all who “FReep!” ;)

The Beloved Levinite^$^

“Recession is when your neighbor loses his job. Depression is when you lose yours. And recovery is when Jimmy Carter loses his.” ~Ronald Reagan


131 posted on 02/25/2008 1:34:38 AM PST by Beloved Levinite ("BUTTER OR JAM, MS. HILLARY ROTTEN!?!?!? YOU'RE TOAST!!!!!!!!!! "(haaaa...))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Conservatives_Unite

“Try joining one of these sites, read and post a message or two. I’d be surprised if you didn’t enjoy it more and find it takes less time than FR.”

I like the FR format better.

And how can you stand the “Liberty Lounge?” That place is overrun with scumbag morons.


132 posted on 02/25/2008 8:34:16 AM PST by dsc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies]

To: Dog Gone; quidam
The obtuseness of Quidam resurrected?

Many have tried, but there was only one Quidam.

The turtle is in the tree

:>)

133 posted on 02/26/2008 2:37:13 PM PST by Syncro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 127 | View Replies]

To: Conservatives_Unite
Oh man yea, those are so much better!

Why would anyone that prefers those forums post at FR?

I don’t blame you for leaving this tired old out-dated site for those shiny new ones

After all, the content isn’t that important.

134 posted on 02/26/2008 2:41:48 PM PST by Syncro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies]

To: dsc

I included Liberty Lounge as an example of what vBulletin has to offer in the way of a user interface. I have never even read the site’s content.


135 posted on 02/26/2008 2:59:48 PM PST by Conservatives_Unite
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 132 | View Replies]

To: Syncro
As stated in my original post here, the objection I have is with the FR interface. Perhaps you missed it due to the clumsiness of FR and said interface?

Thanks for proving my point.
136 posted on 02/26/2008 3:02:33 PM PST by Conservatives_Unite
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 134 | View Replies]

To: dsc
And before you ask, yes, I know in my original post I said that I frequent Liberty Lounge. But what happened is, before posting that I originally listed a different site that I do frequent. By mistake, I submitted to FR but forgot to change the lead-in text. Ironically, I went to edit the post but alas, there doesn't seem to be a way to do that on FR (that was easy or that I could find). A fine example of the type of shortcoming I'm talking about, wow.

I'm curious though - what features at this site make you prefer it to sites with newer, more state-of-the-art UI's? For me, an objective comparison results in quite a discrepancy, feature-for-feature. What does this site have that the newer ones don't?
137 posted on 02/26/2008 3:14:38 PM PST by Conservatives_Unite
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 132 | View Replies]

To: Conservatives_Unite
As stated in my original post here, the objection I have is with the FR interface.

And I answered you. I am posting it again, and am bolding it. (pretty slick, we can bold words here!)

I don’t blame you for leaving this tired old out-dated site for those shiny new ones
Let me know if you missed it again.

That was my way of saying that the interface on this site works quite well, thank you.

Perhaps you missed it due to the clumsiness of FR and said interface?

You'll get used to it after you've been here a while.

Some people get it quite quickly, some take a while. Be patient.

You have't figured out the edit feature yet? It's really quite simple. Old fashioned (only clumsy to those with that propensity) but honestly quite effective.

138 posted on 02/26/2008 4:40:00 PM PST by Syncro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 136 | View Replies]

To: Conservatives_Unite

“What does this site have that the newer ones don’t? “

Seems like the new ones make you click click click click click click click click click click click click to read a thread.

This one, you can just scroll down.


139 posted on 02/26/2008 10:00:54 PM PST by dsc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 137 | View Replies]

To: Racehorse

Always worth a re-read. Thanks!


140 posted on 02/26/2008 10:03:46 PM PST by Freedom2specul8 (Please pray for our troops.... http://anyservicemember.navy.mil/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140141-148 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson