Replies

The likely Republican presidential nominee said Clinton "would be a good president in the respect that I think she has integrity, I think she has all of the qualities that are necessary, but she has a very different philosophical view, the liberal Democratic view, than I have, which is conservative Republican."

Hell of a lot of lies in that statement.....count em !

The likely Republican presidential nominee said Clinton "would be a good president in the respect that I think she has integrity, I think she has all of the qualities that are necessary, but she has a very different philosophical view, the liberal Democratic view, than I have, which is conservative Republican."

He truly is the IDIOT that we've always thought he was. This pretty much wraps it up, although I'll have to say that I've always had ZERO intention of voting for the old leftist.

Essentially, he's just validated what a lot of us have been saying...which is that there's simply not much difference between the likes of McCain, and the DNC hopefuls.

I'm really starting to feel bad for all the people clinging to McCain. It's starting to be a difficult thing to watch. I'm really losing my will to even poke fun at them anymore. Eventually, they'll lose heart and realize what we already know...and I really don't wish that on them.

It's going to be an "interesting" 8 months!

The likely Republican presidential nominee said Clinton "would be a good president (1, she would be a terrible president) in the respect that I think she has integrity (probably not a lie, he actually believes this), I think she has all of the qualities that are necessary (probably not a lie, he actually believes this), but she has a very different philosophical view (2, no she doesn't), the liberal Democratic view (3, no what passes for leftist democrat views these days is a mish-mash of Communism, Socialism and Marxism), than I have (4, his views aren't all that different than hers on a myriad of issues), which is conservative Republican (5, this guy wouldn't know Conservatism from the worst Isms known to man)."

What we have here are five outright lies and two examples of John not knowing honest political differences from history's most embarrassing failed ideologies. Even extending the benefit of the doubt to John on the seven issues he touched on, he displays a woefully inadequate understanding of the domestic and global political stage, for a man trying to become President of the United States.

This means he is capable of just about anything, not having a firm foundation on the fundamentals.