Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

McCain has stayed tightfisted on the hustings. According to a January 29 National Taxpayers Union study of presidential candidates’ promises, McCain wants $6.9 billion in new spending. Former Massachusetts governor Willard Mitt Romney favors $19.5 billion in fresh outlays. “Free-market” Romney’s automated phone calls in Florida actually slammed McCain because he “voted against the AARP-backed Medicare prescription-drug program.” Former Arkansas governor Mike Huckabee advocates $54.2 billion in government-funded initiatives. Romney’s ideological gymnastics and Huckabee’s folksy profligacy should worry taxpayers.

“You would not have to look hard for reasons to dislike McCain,” says Cato’s Michael Tanner. “But if spending is what you care about, he is far more conservative than either Romney or Huckabee.”



The above sums up why I was left with no horse in the race when Fred dropped out.
1 posted on 02/09/2008 8:35:29 AM PST by rob777
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041 next last
To: rob777

Equating McCain with the greatest President of the 20th century is obscene.


2 posted on 02/09/2008 8:37:07 AM PST by mkjessup (Any SOB who calls John F'in Kerry "his dear friend" will NEVER get my vote, no way, no how.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rob777
anti-ANWR-oil-drilling votes

Where is the "fiscal discipline" in forcing us to buy oil from depots that hate us?

Regards

3 posted on 02/09/2008 8:37:44 AM PST by ARE SOLE (Agents Ramos and Campean are in prison at this very moment.. (A "Concerned Citizen".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rob777

He may or may not be, but people hear aren’t going to listen.

McCain has assemble an awesome economic team, but you are going to get the “Juan Hernandez” photo posted in about 10 seconds.


4 posted on 02/09/2008 8:38:19 AM PST by Perdogg (Richard B Cheney - A National Treasure)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rob777

If his Campaign management is any indicator, he’s a regular Imelda Marcos of fiscal responsibility.


5 posted on 02/09/2008 8:38:32 AM PST by farmer18th
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rob777
Then he voted for this “stimulus” travesty and promises to destroy the economy in the name of saving the Earth.
6 posted on 02/09/2008 8:38:49 AM PST by DManA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rob777

But we have to rally behind Mr. “50 cent gas-tax, open borders, taxpayer funded embryonic cell research, carbon taxer”, don’t you know?


11 posted on 02/09/2008 8:42:50 AM PST by Politicalmom (Don't blame me. I voted for FRED!! I'm a refugee from the GOP.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rob777
Twice in my lifetime I have had the pleasure of casting my vote with joy knowing that the man I am voting for is the one person alive I would most want as president. That was in 1980 and 1984. The rest of my life, I have voted defensively, i.e. I have voted against the other candidate.

I will do so again this time with the least amount of joy I have ever had but I will do it.

I'm sorry so many people feel that it is somehow acceptable to give the white house to the dems when they already have congress. It will give them the scotus and we will wait 30 years to recover from that.

14 posted on 02/09/2008 8:43:45 AM PST by muir_redwoods (Free Sirhan Sirhan, after all, the bastard who killed Mary Jo Kopechne is walking around free)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rob777

He’ll be the best president Mexamericanada ever has.


16 posted on 02/09/2008 8:45:13 AM PST by ScratInTheHat (It's about the illegal’s stupid!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rob777

McCain lost me when he started his ‘class envy/class warfare’ tax preferences several years ago.


22 posted on 02/09/2008 8:47:36 AM PST by stockstrader
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rob777
Before my more conservative friends start leaping from buildings over Senator John McCain’s presidential primary victories....

Why do they so feel the need to say things like this? I guess it's just part of the effort to paint those who don't agree with them as hysterical children.

It's like accusing all those who did not favor making illegals legal and giving them a big, fat goody bag to boot of wanting to "deport them all." It's a false charge, but it suits their storyline.

25 posted on 02/09/2008 8:48:27 AM PST by Bahbah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rob777

McCain is NEVER going to turn into Reagan. Not even a little bit kinda like sort of. In fact, the only connections that John McCain had with Barry Goldwater is that at one time or another, both had served in the military, and both had served in the Senate as representatives of Arizona, Goldwater representing the state a LOT more than McCain ever has.

Still not convinced of McCain’s “bono fides”.


26 posted on 02/09/2008 8:49:49 AM PST by alloysteel (Extremism in the defense of liberty is no vice, moderation in the pursuit of justice is no virtue)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rob777

This is a joke! McCain is planning raise through his carbon cap and trade scheme and impose very intrusive regulations on industry and private citizens.

Get real!


29 posted on 02/09/2008 8:51:19 AM PST by Eva (Benedict Arnold was a war hero, too.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rob777

“McCain Could Become the Reagan of Fiscal Discipline”

Fiscal Discipline and the war in Iraq are the only two areas that I trust this cretin, and I’m not real big on the war so when he talked about being there for 100 years I wasn’t exactly jumping for joy.


30 posted on 02/09/2008 8:51:32 AM PST by Grunthor (Juan McAmnesty - The End of America; Comitted to Mexico and 100 *&**& years!!??)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rob777
If “if’s” and “but’s” were cherries and nuts... Christmas would come every day!

LLS

32 posted on 02/09/2008 8:52:12 AM PST by LibLieSlayer ("There is no conservative alternative in the race. It's just that simple." Rush Limbaugh)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rob777
Before my more conservative friends start leaping from buildings over Senator John McCain’s presidential primary victories, let me try to coax them back in from the ledge.

I'm not the one leaping off the building, Deroy, YOU are. Let's try another analogy, shall we? The SS Republicana is going down, the water is lapping at the rails, and you and your ilk are rearranging the deck chairs.

35 posted on 02/09/2008 8:54:04 AM PST by COBOL2Java (Vote for McCain! Mental health is overrated!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rob777

Even the Drive-bys noticed he didn’t mention MMGW and Embryonic stem cell research in his speech. He’s a damnable liar and thief.


36 posted on 02/09/2008 8:55:08 AM PST by wolfcreek (Powers that be will lie like Clintons and spend like drunken McCains to push their Globalist agenda.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rob777

I agree that McCain has opposed wasteful government spending and that is good. But McCain’s position on government subsidies for illegal aliens and his support of programs to combat supposed global warming are far more likely to cause huge fiscal problems.


42 posted on 02/09/2008 8:56:36 AM PST by detective
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rob777

Another chatterer that I never heard of giving conservatives a lecture on the Keating Five guy.


45 posted on 02/09/2008 8:59:24 AM PST by Biblebelter (I will NEVER EVER vote for McCain or any other current Senator.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rob777
What a load.

True, McCain heretically opposed President Bush’s 2001 and 2003 tax cuts. However, he now appears penitent and observant.

Bull. He defends his vote, although it's on different grounds from what he said at the time. He's no tax cutter.

51 posted on 02/09/2008 9:07:39 AM PST by xjcsa (Limbaugh/Petraeus 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rob777
A budget hawk? How so? In your dreams. And how short our memories. The cost of his amnesty bill was estimated to be $89 billion a year. That is he wanted to spend, according to Heritage. From Heritage and Boortz: ...About $30,160 every year in immediate benefits and services for every low-skill immigrant household.

To compound the distributional deficit, low-skill immigrant households pay less in taxes than do the average U.S. Households. These low-skill immigrant households pay about $10,573 a year in taxes. Subtract this from the amount government spends on them and you have a deficit of $19,588.

..Let's carry these numbers for our wonderful illegal -- soon to be legal -- households out a few years. Rector says that the average adult lifespan for each head of household is about 60 years. The research shows that this distributional deficit will continue throughout this life span for low-skill immigrant households. The total? About $1.2 million for each low-skill immigrant household.

In 2004 there were 4.5 million low-skill immigrant households in the U.S. More math: Multiply the average net distributional deficit of $19,588 per household and you get a total deficit of $89.1 billion .... per year! Ask yourself .. can this country afford this? Can we afford an amnesty bill that will legitimize and legalize these illegal-alien households, and millions more to come? No. The costs are financially unsustainable.

52 posted on 02/09/2008 9:08:05 AM PST by 3AngelaD (They screwed up their own countries so bad they had to leave, and now they're here screwing up ours)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson