Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Venture capitalist says nuclear fusion is coming
Next Big Future ^ | February 07, 2008

Posted on 02/09/2008 7:10:32 AM PST by jmcenanly

A picture from the patent filing for what General fusion is trying to build with backing from Chrysalix Energy Venture Capital. GF will build a ~3 meter diameter spherical tank filled with liquid metal (lead-lithium mixture). Rams use compressed steam to accelerate pistons to ~50 m/s. Make compression wave in the liquid metal. Microsecond of fusion once per second. Note: This could be considered like a variant of "steam punk nuclear fusion" made real if it works.

(Excerpt) Read more at nextbigfuture.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Canada; Technical
KEYWORDS: canada; chrysalix; energy; fusion; generalfusion; magnetizedtarget; mtf; nuclear; nuclearfusion; technology
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-27 next last
what this site needs is a technology topic area
1 posted on 02/09/2008 7:10:35 AM PST by jmcenanly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: jmcenanly

Interesting. First step until we see “Mr Fusion” everywhere perhaps?


2 posted on 02/09/2008 7:14:06 AM PST by Edward Watson (Fanatics with guns beat liberals with ideas)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jmcenanly
Yeah, but does it have one of these?


3 posted on 02/09/2008 7:16:31 AM PST by Philistone (If someone tells you it's for the children, he believes that YOU are a child.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jmcenanly

what do ypu know about those Chinese projects that were supposed to be close to operational a year or two ago?


4 posted on 02/09/2008 7:17:14 AM PST by gusopol3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Edward Watson

“steam punk nuclear fusion”
I hate punks!


5 posted on 02/09/2008 7:17:20 AM PST by Dr. Bogus Pachysandra ("Don't touch that thing")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: jmcenanly

6 posted on 02/09/2008 7:19:07 AM PST by Bobalu (I guess I done see'd that varmint for the last time....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Bogus Pachysandra

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Steam_punk


7 posted on 02/09/2008 7:19:17 AM PST by Dr. Bogus Pachysandra ("Don't touch that thing")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Grampa Dave

In before the energy ping.


8 posted on 02/09/2008 7:25:47 AM PST by MrEdd (Heck? Geewhiz Cripes, thats the place where people who don't believe in Gosh think they aint going.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Edward Watson
Maybe not by 2015, but check back in 2028.

Unlike its cinematic counterpart, I don't think it'll run on ethanol

9 posted on 02/09/2008 7:32:11 AM PST by jmcenanly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: jmcenanly
Lobby for the use of "technology" as a keyword for technology related postings, and add the keyword to any technology related posts you happen across.

It works for the banglist,/a> keyword, and I'm trying to make it work for the aerospace keyword as well.

Bookmark the keyword search, and you have an instant "ping list."

10 posted on 02/09/2008 7:33:34 AM PST by Yo-Yo (USAF, TAC, 12th AF, 366 TFW, 366 MG, 366 CRS, Mtn Home AFB, 1978-81)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jmcenanly

Venture capitalist or scam artist?


11 posted on 02/09/2008 7:35:07 AM PST by Moonman62 (The issue of whether cheap labor makes America great should have been settled by the Civil War.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Venture capitalist or scam artist?

Phase 1: Collect underpants

Phase 2: ?

Phase 3: Fusion power!

12 posted on 02/09/2008 7:48:37 AM PST by Honcho Bongs (Socialism is the philosophy of failure, the creed of ignorance and the gospel of envy. - Churchill)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Moonman62

“Venture capitalist or scam artist?

Officials of the Lagos, Nigeria-based company promised to make important announcements very soon via e-mail and internet marketing communications, “but due to market conditions would be forced to limit offerings to only those investment parters who SINCERELY want to be millionaires.”


13 posted on 02/09/2008 7:57:50 AM PST by Clioman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: jmcenanly
In three to four years, scientists will demonstrate results that show that fusion has a 60 percent chance of success, he said.

Sounds like that sure fire cologne that reporter used in the movie "Anchor Man":

"50% of the time it works every time".

14 posted on 02/09/2008 7:58:56 AM PST by DManA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jmcenanly

Nuclear Fusion is 20 years away and has been for the last 40 years.


15 posted on 02/09/2008 7:59:16 AM PST by MilspecRob (Most people don't act stupid, they really are.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MilspecRob

I would change your sentence to, “A controlled Nuclear Fusion reaction is 20 years a way and has been for the last 40 years.”


16 posted on 02/09/2008 8:17:25 AM PST by aft_lizard (born conservative...I chose to be a republican)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: MilspecRob
Of course, no one can predict the future. Especially in technology. But you can make educated guesses. And the best educated guesses, I imagine, would come from the people with the most experience in the subject.

In terms of fusion, I worked with a fellow who was head of the Institute for Nuclear Physics in Russia before he came to the U.S. He was also asked to head the ITER international fusion project, which is the largest fusion initiative yet. He declined, having already spent more years as an administrator than he wished.

Anyway, when I asked him when he thought we would see practical fusion, he did not think it would be in his lifetime and probably at least 50 years away.

I assume that estimate is based on conventional approaches to fusion like magnetic confinement. Barring some, as yet, unimagined technology, we won't see practical fusion for a long, long time.

17 posted on 02/09/2008 8:33:56 AM PST by pjd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: jmcenanly

bmflr


18 posted on 02/09/2008 9:10:31 AM PST by Kevmo (SURFRINAGWIASS : Shut Up RINOs. Free Republic is not a GOP Website. It’s a SOCON Site.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jmcenanly

Hmm, what happened to the last guy who tried to make nuclear fusion?

19 posted on 02/09/2008 9:13:43 AM PST by dfwgator (11+7+15=3 Heismans)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Honcho Bongs

1. Collect Underpants
2. Nuclear Fusion
3. ????
4. PROFIT!


20 posted on 02/09/2008 9:15:22 AM PST by struggle ((The struggle continues))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-27 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson