Now he can prove how stupid he really is ?
.
1 posted on
02/08/2008 10:57:21 PM PST by
george76
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21 next last
To: george76
he was just teasing, don’t cha know.. lol
2 posted on
02/08/2008 11:03:00 PM PST by
NormsRevenge
(Semper Fi ... Godspeed ... ICE’s toll-free tip hotline —1-866-DHS-2-ICE ... 9/11 .. Never FoRGeT)
To: Fred Nerks; Candor7; forkinsocket; Beckwith; G8 Diplomat; SunkenCiv; Clive; blam; Marine_Uncle; ...
3 posted on
02/08/2008 11:03:16 PM PST by
george76
(Ward Churchill : Fake Indian, Fake Scholarship, and Fake Art)
To: george76
the broader issues around the rights of religious groupsThat, FRiend, is the core of the logical fallacy of his position. People have rights, but the concept of "group rights" (what the French revolutionaries referred to as " collective liberty") is the source of tyranny.
4 posted on
02/08/2008 11:03:23 PM PST by
Squawk 8888
(Is human activity causing the warming trend on Mars?)
To: sionnsar
5 posted on
02/08/2008 11:05:21 PM PST by
neodad
(USS Vincennes (CG 49) "Checkmate Cruiser")
To: george76
I’ve been wanting this panty-waste to go for years!! I loathe that spineless worm...can’t stand to look at him. He’s a weak-kneed, leftist dhimmi who shames the very ground he walks on. He is unworthy of his position, and unworthy to lead a single English soul.
To: george76; All
I've heard that this man is brilliant. I await the vetting of this subject expecting to find he was taken ridiculously out of context.
It might just be an object lesson in just how volatile public perceptions are.
8 posted on
02/08/2008 11:08:47 PM PST by
the invisib1e hand
(anyone can be a soldier in peacetime.)
To: george76; sionnsar
"He is a disaster for the Church of England. He vacillates, he is a weak leader and he does not stand up for the Church. I would like to see him resign and go back to academia." Well, Anglicans here in the New World already figured that part out...when he did nothing as the liberals put in place the flagrantly homosexual bishop, held a Clown Eucharist, and proceeded to persecute (including through litigation in secular courts) anyone who stood up to defend the Bible.
9 posted on
02/08/2008 11:10:11 PM PST by
rabscuttle385
(Admin Moderator for President. No amnesty for the establishment—Republican and Democrat!)
To: george76
[”One wants to be charitable, but I sense that he (Dr. Williams) would be far happier in a university where he can kick around these sorts of ideas.”
Better yet, in a mosque.
10 posted on
02/08/2008 11:10:41 PM PST by
Brad from Tennessee
("A politician can't give you anything he hasn't first stolen from you.")
To: george76
This guy is a traitor to his country and the free world.
Anglicans everywhere need to throw this bum out.
13 posted on
02/08/2008 11:13:57 PM PST by
VictoryGal
(Never give up, never surrender!)
To: george76
Just another secular appeasement wimp.
Typical leftist liberal in love with authoritarian
tyranny.
The Jimmah Cartah of England.
19 posted on
02/08/2008 11:30:17 PM PST by
ChiMark
To: george76
Good another reason NOT to go to church...perhaps I’m really a Deist (whatever that is). I sure don’t think I’m an Episcopalian any more.
22 posted on
02/08/2008 11:55:43 PM PST by
rhombus
To: george76
“I was just playing,” is the favorite excuse for the schoolyard bully. “I was just encouraging discussion when I spouted my inflammatory ideas,” is the Leftist’s mantra, when such ideas provoke a fire-storm. Such “leaders” ought to be sacked forthwith as a deterrent to the next bomb-thrower, who might be discouraged from spouting off if there were some immediate consequences to such loose talk.
To: Professional Engineer
26 posted on
02/09/2008 4:28:01 AM PST by
Peanut Gallery
("An armed society is a polite society.")
To: george76
his core aim was "to tease out some of the broader issues around the rights of religious groups within a secular state".
The good archbishop is as thick as a block of cement.
He hasn't the faintest clue that the ultimate goal of the Islamists among him is the establishment of a RELIGIOUS state in England, where there will be no question of sharia law, because it will be the only law.
He's doing his best to hasten that fateful day.
To: george76
If by “hitting back” they mean “lamely tries to justify his outrageous comments.”
33 posted on
02/09/2008 9:23:03 AM PST by
Polonius
(It's called logic, it'll help you.)
To: george76
To: george76
His aim was...”to tease out some of the broader issues around the rights of religious groups within a secular state”.
This is not a game or an academic exercise.
40 posted on
02/09/2008 11:57:26 AM PST by
SuzyQue
(Remember to think.)
To: george76; AdmSmith; Berosus; Convert from ECUSA; dervish; Ernest_at_the_Beach; Fred Nerks; ...
48 posted on
02/09/2008 11:16:18 PM PST by
SunkenCiv
(https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/_______________________Profile updated Wednesday, January 16,)
To: george76
Colonel Edward Armitstead, a Synod member ..."One wants to be charitable, but I sense that he would be far happier in a university where he can kick around these sorts of ideas."Indeed. It's the duty of a bishop to stand for the truth, and Williams is either incapable or unwilling to do that. A university is the perfect venue to kick ideas around. Unfortunately, they never seem to kick around any sane ones anymore, so this one would fit right in.
51 posted on
02/10/2008 6:30:17 AM PST by
Zero Sum
(Liberalism: The damage ends up being a thousand times the benefit! (apologies to Rabbi Benny Lau))
To: george76
Why does this idjit comb his eyebrows to horns?
52 posted on
02/10/2008 6:38:53 AM PST by
decimon
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson