To: Antoninus
You don’t play chess well, do you?
This isn’t a simple black-white thing, not by a long shot. And AC is dramatizing an important point.
Look, as long as we have 41 reliable votes in the Senate, we can block nearly everything a Prezdent Hillary would want to do. But, with a pubbie Prez, those 41+ would be hard pressed to take the same stands and draw the same lines in the sand.
277 posted on
02/01/2008 3:52:26 AM PST by
savedbygrace
(SECURE THE BORDERS FIRST (I'M YELLING ON PURPOSE))
To: savedbygrace
...Look, as long as we have 41 reliable votes in the Senate, we can block nearly everything a Prezdent Hillary would want to do. But, with a pubbie Prez, those 41+ would be hard pressed to take the same stands and draw the same lines in the sand.
Ding, ding, ding!
We have a WINNER!
This is EXACTLY the problem!
Watching the alleged "GOP" in California follow SchwarzenKennedy over the cliff -- just because "he is one of us" -- should be enough of a warnng of what would be in store with President (God forbid!) McCain.
399 posted on
02/01/2008 7:07:46 AM PST by
RonDog
To: savedbygrace
Look, as long as we have 41 reliable votes in the Senate, we can block nearly everything a Prezdent Hillary would want to do. But, with a pubbie Prez, those 41+ would be hard pressed to take the same stands and draw the same lines in the sand.
I've made exactly that point--which is why I will not vote for Romney if he's the GOP nominee. That said, I would never, ever pull the lever for a Democrat marxist like Hillbama. I'll go 3rd party.
Ann could have said that and had the same strategic effect. She's either serious about campaigning for Hillary or just trying to grab some headlines by throwing bombs.
470 posted on
02/01/2008 8:28:12 AM PST by
Antoninus
(The other guys s#ck so I'm stuck with Huck!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson