Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Hoodat
While Romney's embrace of timetable terminology seemed to put some distance between himself and Bush, the former Massachusetts governor also made it clear that he does not support efforts on the part of the Democratic Congress to establish a public timetable.

--snip--

Romney did not indicate how the timetables he favors would be kept private nor did he indicate what steps he thinks the United States should take if the Iraqi government were to fail to meet the privately established timetables and milestones.

The timetables would be private until the appeared on the front page of the New York Times.

2,330 posted on 01/30/2008 7:50:39 PM PST by Little_GTO
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2236 | View Replies ]


To: Little_GTO

Timetables for what exactly? He already spoke plainly about timetables for withdrawal stating emphatically that he would veto any measure that called for them. Capesce? Now that we’ve cleared that up about withdrawal timetables, what is it exactly that these other time tables you bring up are all about?


2,349 posted on 01/30/2008 7:54:24 PM PST by Hoodat (The whole point of the Conservative Movement is to gain converts, not demonize them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2330 | View Replies ]

To: Little_GTO

http://blog.washingtonpost.com/fact-checker/2008/01/mccain_attacks_romney_on_iraq.html


2,368 posted on 01/30/2008 8:00:03 PM PST by Cold Heat (Mitt....2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2330 | View Replies ]

To: Little_GTO

The timetables would be private until the appeared on the front page of the New York Times.”

LOL


2,419 posted on 01/30/2008 8:21:41 PM PST by Tennessee Nana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2330 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson