Posted on 01/28/2008 7:27:44 PM PST by 2ndDivisionVet
Hopefully, McCrazy will lose and Medved’s career will be over!
That would be cosmic justice!
It should read “Conservative Radio Talkers”. That would leave Medved out.
I disagree with alot of persons on this blog. I will vote for McCain. I will vote for Romney. I think McCain would be a better candidate Nationally and I think he is more Conservative than Romney at heart. Romeny is just recently said the right things. McCain you know he will stand up for most Conservative social issues. Economically he will be good. He will be a supreme warrior. I trust him to defend this country. Rush is all wrong. His sins are not as great as many think.
Arizona Freepers have a totally different take on McLame thank yours. I don’t think McLame has a conservative bone in his body. He and Arnold would make a great set of twins.
I don’t care what anyone says. I WILL NOT VOTE FOR JOHN MCCAIN. I WILL WRITE IN MICKEY MOUSE. HE CAN’T BE TRUSTED AS FAR AS I CAN THROW A HOUSE.
Try the many articles here at FreeRepublic, other posters have done a good job of cataloging the multitude of McCrazy’s sins against conservatism.
Apologies to any who feel I am spamming this message on campaign threads, but it is an important message on a key vote which needs to get out.
mccain would bring back the Fairness Doctrine.
The so-called "money in politics" is really more of a concern about McCain's legislation restricting freedom of political speech...
Mark Levin Hates McCain very much.
Doctor:
That is why we have a republican democracy, so that we are able to vote for whomever we feel would best take our country in the right direction. I respectfully disagree with you, but your vote is yours to bestow. I hope that you will read, study and pray on your decision, as we all should.
Fred
Has Mark Levin said he Hates McCrazy, or is that just your interpretation?
“(McCain’s) sins are not as great as many think”.
________________________________
A few words from ‘the other’ (David) Limbaugh:
“I respectfully reject that McCain’s honorable and sacrificial character-building experiences or his self-description as a “straight talker” place his veracity above question. I remember him sidling up to the media by falsely claiming George Bush didn’t level with the American people about how long the Iraq war could take. I remember him blaming dirty campaign tricks on Bush in South Carolina in 2000, when investigations revealed there was no evidence Bush was behind it. I remember him joining liberals in slandering the truth-telling Swift Boat veterans as “dishonest and dishonorable.” I remember his disingenuous derision of the across-the-board Bush tax cuts as being only for the rich. I witnessed him changing his position on immigration to shore up support in South Carolina, then after that primary arrogantly denying to Sean Hannity that he’d flip-flopped. People can assess for themselves whether McCain is always straight, but hopefully they’ll base their decision on the evidence and not his hero status.
“He crusades against Guantanamo, favors constitutional rights for terrorists but opposes tough interrogation techniques, was the ringleader of the Gang of 14, which legitimized the filibustering of judicial nominees, and is the godfather of political speech-suppressing and Democrat-favoring campaign-finance reform legislation.
“He has displayed contempt for conservative evangelicals, opposed Bush’s pro-growth tax cuts for reasons other than he says (spending), has engaged in other class-warfare rhetoric like demonizing oil and drug companies, co-sponsored the abominable McCain-Kennedy illegal immigrant-forgiveness/open-borders/Social Security zapping bill, and even voted for the Specter amendment, which could have conferred consulting rights on Mexico concerning the erection of a southern border fence.
“He sold out on global warming, opportunistically opposed drilling in ANWR, favors re-importation of drugs from Canada, and promoted the McCain-Kennedy-Edwards patients bill of rights. Even his pro-life credentials are not as pristine as we’re told: He opposes reversal of Roe vs. Wade and sided with anti-political speech zealots in filing an amicus brief against Wisconsin Right to Life.”
Please check:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XazpaYwFKd8&e
and
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SUDBV6RhQho
I'm with you. I'm voting for our nominee, whoever he may be. But if it's Romney, I will suspect that I am not voting for a true conservative, but an opportunist who reinvented himself as one.
The bottom line is that ANY REPUBLICAN is better than ANY RAT.
FredHeads for Mitt? You couldn’t pay me enough to vote for Romney in the primary. Maybe some FredHeads can be “bought” by this ultra-liberal pretending to be a conservative (just for the primaries).
Unless you are a democrat or a liberal moderate, a simple look at his record, at the things he has supported and/or co-authored, will make you re-think your post. He is NOT a conservative and actual Republican McCain supporters should re-think their support. I don't care what office he's running for or who he's running against, I will NEVER vote for him again.
Its continued resistance to McCain will be ineffective and will hurt both the Republican Party and the radio industry, Medved said.
In other words, Medved doesn't like that they aren't carrying water for his guy.
Medved's show is terrible.
I appreciate it!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.