I could expand this, but it’s pointless. You are convinced that no matter what, it’s best we didn’t have Gore.
You probably realize what will happen if the Supreme Court agrees with the Bush administration and allows carve-outs that apply to our second ammendment rights.
It will give communities across this nation the right to determine what weapons they don’t want us to have, and ban them.
In extreme circumstances they could make the case that we only needed “X” weapon to protect ourselves and ban every other one.
This has been a right for our citizens for over 225 years, and Bush in one burst of brain power decided to jump in with both feet and screw us.
It honestly baffles me how folks can just smile and act as if they are on tranquilizers when we bring this up. Then they have the timerity to call me names and totally ignore the issue.
Nope, no worries. Gore wasn’t involved. Everything is okay.
Ah... I was not talking about that case at all. But since you brought it up, would this situation be better if there were two people GORE had appointed on the surpreme court? Heck we might lose the 2ndA entirely if that had been the case.
Apparantly none of you guys realize DC is a “special case”. Read through the Constitution and get back to us regarding who has “exclusive legislative jurisdiction” over DC ~ and then ‘splain to me what the DC government’s job is.