yes he might because there might be third party convention sprint center Kansas city before deadline because after he run,s down more candidates mc mcain we understand campaighn finance these,s s candidates his show a challenge to rush call huckabee he.s not wasting money come on rush dont hide under the eib desk if you dislike him challenge
1 posted on
01/24/2008 11:13:19 AM PST by
kendall
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-39 next last
To: Politicalmom; 2ndDivisionVet
2 posted on
01/24/2008 11:14:31 AM PST by
TheThirdRuffian
(Don't blame me; I will write in Thompson.)
To: kendall
yes he might because there might be third party convention sprint center Kansas city before deadline because after he run,s down more candidates mc mcain we understand campaighn finance these,s s candidates his show a challenge to rush call huckabee he.s not wasting money come on rush dont hide under the eib desk if you dislike him challenge
That's easy for you to say!
3 posted on
01/24/2008 11:15:08 AM PST by
drjimmy
To: kendall
Thanks for the post, but could you please rewrite your reply with capital letters. I’m not trying to insult but I can’t read it.
4 posted on
01/24/2008 11:15:09 AM PST by
netmilsmom
(Financing James Marsden's kid's college fund, 1 ticket, 1 DVD at a time.)
To: kendall
Old news alert...and by the way what on earth language are you writing that in?
6 posted on
01/24/2008 11:16:06 AM PST by
xjcsa
(Thompson/Romney 2008)
To: kendall
Nod. Rush is right. Vote for whatever gets us to a brokered convention because these candidates suck.
7 posted on
01/24/2008 11:16:28 AM PST by
Greg F
(Romney supported the right of homosexuals to be Scout Masters in 1994.)
To: kendall
I heard that show. He was referring to McQueeg in-particular. I think he was also including Huckabee. Today he said there is two maybe one that he could vote for.
To: kendall
Limbaugh said on Mondays show: "I can see possibly not supporting the Republican nominee this election, and I never thought that I would say that in my life."******************
I never thought I'd say it either, but here we are.
I may be writing in Fred's name.
10 posted on
01/24/2008 11:17:27 AM PST by
trisham
(Zen is not easy. It takes effort to attain nothingness. And then what do you have? Bupkis.)
To: kendall
11 posted on
01/24/2008 11:18:01 AM PST by
mnehring
To: kendall
13 posted on
01/24/2008 11:20:16 AM PST by
ASA Vet
To: kendall
oh man it is good to hear is isnt going to carry water for them anymore. he can be rightly disgusted as the rest of no more of Rush making excuses like saying”well we denied the dems a talking point by doing 80% of what they’d do any way”
14 posted on
01/24/2008 11:20:42 AM PST by
Liberty2007
(I AM AWESOME , The best thing on Talk radio----Michael Savage)
To: kendall
Try putting down the bong when typing next time.
16 posted on
01/24/2008 11:21:12 AM PST by
nhoward14
(Disenfranchised by the MSM and by liberals/independents voting in Republican primaries.)
To: kendall
18 posted on
01/24/2008 11:22:54 AM PST by
chaos_5
(The Republic is doomed!)
To: kendall
For all of you people who tried to imply that Governor Romney was the 'one' to whom Rush often alluded...
You dont have a genuine down-the-list conservative. Care to try again?
19 posted on
01/24/2008 11:23:25 AM PST by
BlueNgold
(... Feed the tree!)
To: kendall
Limbaugh said on Mondays show: "I can see possibly not supporting the Republican nominee this election, and I never thought that I would say that in my life." The reason: You dont have a genuine down-the-list conservative among the GOP candidates.
This is an old story and was discussed earlier this week when he said it.
But the quotes above are misleading. He didn't say he wouldn't vote BECAUSE there was no "down-the-list" conservative. His reasoning was much more complicated, and came down to looking at the polls and thinking that a guy he could not possibly support might actually win the party nomination.
The two he said he would have trouble with: McCain and Huckabee.
To: kendall
Rush will support the GOP nominee. Guaranteed.
To: kendall
Rush just said a minute ago there is one or two GOP candidates he would vote for.
Then he said, "one"
We know for a fact he will not vote for McCain or Huckabee or Paul so that leaves Rudy and Mitt.
24 posted on
01/24/2008 11:24:06 AM PST by
elizabetty
("Nothing great was ever achieved without enthusiasm." .Ralph Waldo Emerson)
To: kendall
The Republican front-runners want the nomination because it's their turn, he also stated Rush didn't imply a plural there. It seemed he was discussing McCain, who would be the only candidate running who really would feel "entitled" in the way Dole did.
To: kendall
I've looked at my core issues, then at the candidates remaining. Currently we agree 60% and they are not conservative 40%. So when it looks like this, why vote for someone, when they are so wrong, so often? My top 2 were Hunter and Thompson, without them it is looking really bad. I may go 3rd party too.
Conservative I am! But Republican? Not anymore if this is what they've got!
28 posted on
01/24/2008 11:25:57 AM PST by
King_Corey
(A King is Sovereign of his life and not a slave)
To: kendall
Rush is a first class hypocrite! He’s part of the problem. There were two solid Conservatives in the GOP race and he did not lift a finger to help one them. So, I just don’t want to hear it from him....
34 posted on
01/24/2008 11:29:11 AM PST by
Virginia Ridgerunner
(“We must not forget that there is a war on and our troops are in the thick of it!” --Duncan Hunter)
To: kendall
Know exactly how Rush feels.
He has never been in lock-step for Republicans at all costs.
And neither have I.
Which leads me to:
McCain or Romney or Huckabee or Giuliani vs. Hillary?
Since any one of them would be a train wreck for the country, the pertinent questions are:
1. Do I want the wreck blamed on Clinton/Democrats or Republicans?
2. Would we have been blessed with Ronald Reagan if not for having survived Jimmy Carter?
3. Can I trust McCain or Romney or Huckabee or Giuliani to nominate Supreme Court candidates who would defend the Constitution and the rights therein rather be judicial activists?
Trust McCain? A daunting task. He has more questionable baggage than an El Al airliner flying from Mecca after the Haj.
Trust Romney? I watched him debate Ted Kennedy for Mass. Senator and try to out-Kennedy a Kennedy. Sorry, not looking for someone to "work" with the Dems, looking for someone to slap them into line. Bet your sweet bippy Reid, Pelosi, et al aren't looking to "work" with any Republican President.
Trust Huckabee? Not on my radar screen. He's flying to low to register.
Trust Rudy? I've heard his tune. It has a lousy beat and I can't dance to it.
I have never skipped an election since my first in 1968. It is too valuable a right and an obligation.
However, I have never felt so despondent considering my choices.
Even in 1996.
Maybe I'll just write-in Ronald Reagan.
If dead Democrats can vote, why can't dead Republicans serve.
And it might just get us to a brokered convention where Republicans can get someone they truly want with no undue influence from or for media darlings.
38 posted on
01/24/2008 11:32:01 AM PST by
N. Theknow
(Kennedys: Can't drive, can't fly, can't ski, can't skipper a boat; but they know what's best for us)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-39 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson