How Rush Chooses Candidates
Drive-Bys Think They Beat Rush with McCain Win in South Carolina
Posted on 01/24/2008 11:13:17 AM PST by kendall
McCain/Huckabee 08! Let’s make Mississippi, Texas, and Utah swing states!)
Heh — Romney/Guilianni 08! At least we may win Guam.
ROTFLMAO!!
If anyone believes Romney’s conversion is genuine then they must believe pigs can fly.
I agree. The poster's writing skills are third grade.
As Rush pointed out on Monday, if he had endorsed someone, say Duncan Hunter, then today he’d have to be explaining not only why he endorsed a person who dropped out, but have to be disavowing the ENDORSEMENT given by “his candidate” to a candidate he hates.
In his dialog, his example was McCain, but my guess is even he didn’t think Hunter or Thompson would endorse Huckabee.
You understood that? Translate for the rest of us!
****************
Probably not.
Welcome to the club pal :)
I know how Rush feels. There’s a good chance I won’t be voting Republican for president in November.
I won’t vote for Mr. Giuliani.
I won’t vote for Mr. Huckabee.
Unless he starts faking his sincerity better, I won’t vote for Mr. Romney.
I might manage to bring myself to hold my nose and vote for Mr. McCain, but that’s kind of iffy.
“Spider Pig, Spider Pig,
does whatever a spider pig does
Can he swing, from a web?
No he can’t, he’s a pig”.
Rush has already endorsed by omission.
He’d support Rudy or Mitt at this point.
No sorry he won't have to choose one. "Neither", "none of the above", or "stay home and pout" is always an option no matter who is on the ballot.
“Rush will support the GOP nominee. Guaranteed.”
Not if it’s McCain or Huckabee. Guaranteed.
Rush is a master of manipulating the MSM for fun and profit.
Over the weekend there were stories that Rush was now irrelevant since McInsane won SC in spite of Rush’s campaign against him, so Rush says this, sits back and waits for stories like this, then points to them as evidence that he is still a powerful and influential part of the conservative politics. Rush will be supporting Mitt once he is nominated, don’t worry about that.
I may not either.
It would have been convenient for him to remain 'neutral' in order to be loved and not to upset anyone.... Instead... He thought about it - and to me anyway makes perfect sense choosing the Huck
Yes i know... How could he... how could I, don't you know Huck KILLS CHILDREN and eats them with a glass of urine every morning? LOL
The Anti-Hucks are so incredibly bias and vicious I simply don't believe them...
I’m only Romney because he’s not McCain.
I’m only voting for Romney because he’s not McCain.
You are ignoring the point I made.
For weeks Romney’s supporters were all over this board trying to claim that when Rush said “well, there’s one conservative” that he was speaking of their guy. He made it clear he wasn;t speaking of Romney on several occassions. However, the Mitt-wits were screaming at the top of their lungs that ROmney is a conservative, he’s a Reagan conservative (despite disavoing Reagan years ago), he’s a Rush conservative, etc.
Simply put - he’s not.
Take him for what he is, and if he’s your guy then that is your choice to make.
But please, stop making him out to be more conservative than he is, and please stop trying to re-define conservatism so that he fits.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.