Skip to comments.
ANYONE THINK IT IS TIME FOR ANOTHER PARTY?
Posted on 01/23/2008 1:05:47 PM PST by gbscott1954
I was sitting here thinking something that I have thought before several times in recent months. The Republican Party began as a third party championing the cause of abolition and westward expansion. Just was wondering some of your thoughts about if it is time to begin thinking about a new true conservative party dedicated to true conservative principles?
TOPICS: Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: 2008; elections; fred; fredthompson; thirdparty
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 221-226 next last
To: gbscott1954
I was sitting here thinking something that I have thought before several times in recent months. The Republican Party began as a third party championing the cause of abolition and westward expansion. Just was wondering some of your thoughts about if it is time to begin thinking about a new true conservative party dedicated to true conservative principles? The next viable and serious third party will inhabit the center, and it will be inhabited by people ranging from moderate Democrats who've finally had enough of the extreme left, to moderately conservative Republicans who've had it with "conservative leaders."
This new party will own American politics for 50+ years.
41
posted on
01/23/2008 1:17:54 PM PST
by
r9etb
To: gbscott1954
42
posted on
01/23/2008 1:18:03 PM PST
by
from occupied ga
(Your most dangerous enemy is your own government, Benito Guilinni a short man in search of a balcony)
To: gbscott1954
Yup...Feb. 3rd...SB XLII party!
Seriously, how about the sane, taxpayer, non-PC people’s party?
43
posted on
01/23/2008 1:18:21 PM PST
by
tpanther
To: Slapshot68
I agree... take the Republican Party back!!!
LLS
44
posted on
01/23/2008 1:18:44 PM PST
by
LibLieSlayer
(Support America, Kill terrorists, Destroy dims and vote Fred!)
To: gbscott1954
Sure! I'd just
love decades of Democrat rule in
my children's future. How about you?
I'd rather that conservatives work to clean out the Republican party as much as feasible instead.
45
posted on
01/23/2008 1:18:52 PM PST
by
TChris
("if somebody agrees with me 70% of the time, rather than 100%, that doesn’t make him my enemy." -RR)
To: gbscott1954
Political, tea, or necktie?
46
posted on
01/23/2008 1:19:01 PM PST
by
tacticalogic
("Oh bother!" said Pooh, as he chambered his last round.)
To: Bear_Slayer
Well ok then. I guess its not time for another party then. :-)
To: r9etb
I swear that by moving Left, this “new” party is what my old party is becoming.
48
posted on
01/23/2008 1:19:29 PM PST
by
Ingtar
(MOE 2008 - - I hope there are enough pieces to salvage in 2012)
To: gbscott1954
Absolutely, it may be the only way to save the America of our forefathers. It may be the only way to stop the coordinated destruction of American sovereignty in order to push us towards a global governance.
To: Clemenza
You’re right about that. I hooked up with NY conservative when Jim Buckley was running for senate. Dungeons and dragons is an excellent analogy.
50
posted on
01/23/2008 1:20:35 PM PST
by
isrul
To: gbscott1954
I like the idea but in a country like America an exclusive Conservative Party would become marginalized. Something like the Liberal Dems in Britain.
What I think needs to be done is a serious consolidation of a Conservative block inside the republican party with a prime objective of raising cash because money is power. Then use that cash to command the Republican party with.
We can’t always be waiting for a Ronald Reagan to come along.
51
posted on
01/23/2008 1:20:45 PM PST
by
Berlin_Freeper
(ETERNAL SHAME on the Treasonous and Immoral Democrats!)
To: Clemenza
always attract flakes and are basically glorified role playing games a la Dungeons and Dragons. BINGO
Don't throw the baby out with the bathwater.
Fix the family from within.
Third party advocates fall into two general categories: Commie Rat Party loyals who hope to drain of Republican Party numbers - and egotists with a misplaced idea of their empirical wisdom and importance
52
posted on
01/23/2008 1:21:18 PM PST
by
maine-iac7
(",,,but you can't fool all of the people all the time" LINCOLN)
To: Brilliant
No, but it wouldnt hurt to grumble about it loud enough to get someones attention down at GOP headquarters. If the 2006 election disaster didn't get their attention...Well, they're all dead down at headquarters.
53
posted on
01/23/2008 1:21:22 PM PST
by
dragnet2
To: Beatthedrum
it may be the only way to save the America of our forefathers Short of using ropes and bullets. :-)
54
posted on
01/23/2008 1:21:38 PM PST
by
Bear_Slayer
(When liberty is outlawed only outlaws will have liberty.)
To: Bear_Slayer
OK, good start! Hmmmm.....
We'll need a stripper.
55
posted on
01/23/2008 1:21:53 PM PST
by
theDentist
(Qwerty ergo typo : I type, therefore I misspelll.)
To: gbscott1954
A third party would keep the Democrats in power for ever and ever.
Now, I know it's a tempting thought, but it's also something that DNC trolls would love to post here.
I do not think that YOU are a DNC operative (Like I say, I understand your desire for a more conservative GOP).
However, and coincidentally, your post contains the 3rd party the seed that the DNC would love to plant.
56
posted on
01/23/2008 1:22:52 PM PST
by
Seaplaner
(Never give in. Never give in. Never...except to convictions of honour and good sense. W. Churchill)
To: gbscott1954
57
posted on
01/23/2008 1:24:41 PM PST
by
woollyone
(entropy extirpates evolution and conservation confirms the Creator blessed forever.)
To: gbscott1954
You wanna see a dead Republican Party? Come to Maine.......
58
posted on
01/23/2008 1:25:08 PM PST
by
MrLee
(Sha'alu Shalom Yerushalyim!! God bless Eretz Israel.)
To: RC2
The right-to-life folks aren’t conservative enough for you?
59
posted on
01/23/2008 1:26:09 PM PST
by
CatQuilt
(Lover of cats =^..^= and quilts)
To: gbscott1954
As the election is demonstrating there is not agreement on what "Conservatism" means. You can verify this by reading almost any topic on FR.
Conservative > Pro- Life (some libertarian types disagree
Conservative > Free Trade (paleo-conservatives disagree)
Conservative > Strong Defense (yes, but how much? )
Structurally we have two parties and will continue to. (Due to our winner take all election rules). We've always had two parties, but they have changed names, or just once they were replaced.
Are we at a "replacement" time? I don't see it. The "R's" will 'morph' into something different then they are now. Already we see: more big government supporting, less focused on morality, etc.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 221-226 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson