To: elizabetty
Mark Levine endorsed Fred and i was very happy to hear that.
I understand Rush not wanting to influence the process however at this point it could use a little influence. I have no idea who he is for at this point.
On a side note, This is another primary where non republicans can vote. I think that’s the problem.
107 posted on
01/19/2008 6:47:21 PM PST by
genxer
To: genxer
Wrong!
In SC you have to be a Republican to vote today!
114 posted on
01/19/2008 6:49:26 PM PST by
JRochelle
(John Thune in 2012.)
To: genxer
I think it’s pretty clear that Rush has been favorable to Thompson and Romney.
If Thompson exits this race, I’m not sure what he’s going to do. I don’t think he’ll endorse Romney, but he’ll certainly be getting more praise than anyone else.
I suspect Rush is also going to have to start talking a little fondly of Giuliani...
To: genxer
Mark Levine endorsed Fred and i was very happy to hear that.
I only heard him endorse Fred for SOuth Carolina. He endorsed Romney for Michigan.
Levin's goal is to see that McCain not be the nominee.
170 posted on
01/19/2008 7:05:47 PM PST by
elizabetty
("Nothing great was ever achieved without enthusiasm." .Ralph Waldo Emerson)
To: genxer
I understand Rush not wanting to influence the process Have you listened to Rush for five minutes since 2 Jan?
254 posted on
01/19/2008 7:48:06 PM PST by
Theophilus
(Nothing can make Americans safer than to stop aborting them.)
To: genxer
I understand Rush not wanting to influence the process however at this point it could use a little influence. I have no idea who he is for at this point. My perception is that Rush is against Huckabee and McCain. That would leave Romney, Thompson, or Giuliani.
480 posted on
01/20/2008 11:01:28 AM PST by
Mad_Tom_Rackham
(Elections have consequences.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson