Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Hillary Clinton wins Dem caucus in Nevada
Chicago Sun-To,es ^ | January 19, 2008

Posted on 01/19/2008 1:22:20 PM PST by KeyLargo

Hillary Clinton wins Dem caucus in Nevada

January 19, 2008 Hillary Rodham Clinton has won the Democratic caucuses in Nevada.


TOPICS: Breaking News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: Nevada
KEYWORDS: hillary; nevada; nv2008
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 121-137 next last
To: Repeal 16-17
Any info on how many women voted for The Evil One just because she is a woman?

One of the Dem leaders at a caucus was getting people to go with their candidate. She called Mrs. Clinton, "Hillary" but Mr. Obama, "Senator Obama." I am sick of the Hillary appelation...is this like Cher?

61 posted on 01/19/2008 2:38:41 PM PST by Freee-dame
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: The Forgotten Man
The msm can only hold the line for them to the uninformed electorate.

This may be the majority of voters in 2008....sadly

62 posted on 01/19/2008 2:41:27 PM PST by Freee-dame
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: Repeal 16-17
Any info on how many women voted for The Evil One just because she is a woman?

The dirty little secret of the Democratic nomination process is that black male Democrats rarely vote for Hillary and Hispanics rarely vote for Obama. The margins among those groups are so large as to suggest widespread misogyny among black male Democrats and negrophobia among Hispanic Democrats.

Hispanic negrophonia among Nevada Democrats was the apparent root of all the resentment among the culinary union members to their leadership's decision to endorse Obabma. Also, note that Hillary is leading in the (heavily Hispanic) California polls by a large margin.

63 posted on 01/19/2008 2:42:24 PM PST by ravinson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: conservativeinferno

I go back and forth on this but I am currently of the same opinion as you: the Beast will be easier to beat than the BoyMullah.


64 posted on 01/19/2008 2:47:13 PM PST by samtheman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: proudpapa

Miss Hitlery will take Obama as a running mate, and they will win the election in November.


65 posted on 01/19/2008 2:47:15 PM PST by abclily
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Gator113

Think back to 94, with bill in the wh he lost 52 seats in the house, 9 in the senate and 10 governorships. Hill will screw things up so much the dims will wish it was 94 again.
Nothing to fear.


66 posted on 01/19/2008 2:52:14 PM PST by genghis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland
ROTFLOL!!!

A very Dark Star, no doubt.

67 posted on 01/19/2008 3:00:06 PM PST by Dr. Eckleburg ("I don't think they want my respect; I think they want my submission." - Flemming Rose)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: KeyLargo
and one that has a beard..

Probably the result of too many face lifts.

68 posted on 01/19/2008 3:05:33 PM PST by ol' hoghead (He is not here; for he is risen.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: KeyLargo

69 posted on 01/19/2008 3:14:18 PM PST by doug from upland (Stopping Hillary should be a FreeRepublic Manhattan Project)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: John Semmens

Yes, but that (IMO) would be cancelled out by the men who won’t vote for her just because she’s female. So, taking that out of the equation... see the earlier post about why she’s a good opponent.


70 posted on 01/19/2008 3:14:45 PM PST by I_like_good_things_too (Check the "Yes" box next to survival)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland

I’m not delusional, please, tell me why she’s a better candidate in a general with such high negatives, then Obama.

I think fewer republicans will stay home if she’s the candidate, and that swing state voters (Ohioans in particular) have very negative views of her. I.e., in the state that matters, I think she’s a weaker candidate than Obama. I could be wrong, but delusional?


71 posted on 01/19/2008 3:19:00 PM PST by I_like_good_things_too (Check the "Yes" box next to survival)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: I_like_good_things_too

There are perhaps 5 million young airhead women who have no idea about what happened in the 1990s -— the sexual assaults and then destroying the victims by Hillary. They will come out to vote because she is a woman. I saw several of these when I went to a Hillary organizational meeting. Today, she got 59% of the Dem women vote. To top it off, she is capable of vote fraud like nobody else. She is willing to conduct illegal activities like nobody else. She is willing to intimidate people like nobody else. The press largely either loves her or is very, very afraid of her. And Soros will spend half a billion dollars if that’s what it takes to get her elected.


72 posted on 01/19/2008 3:24:38 PM PST by doug from upland (Stopping Hillary should be a FreeRepublic Manhattan Project)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: Names Ash Housewares
And if God forbid she did win, I would prefer her to B. Hussien Obama for war on terror stuff.

Why? George Soros is behind both Obama and Hillary. They follow the same muse; and they both learned their way from Leftist/communist Saul Alinsksy.

73 posted on 01/19/2008 3:29:20 PM PST by cricket (Hucka-not)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland

59% of dem women? Isn’t that a redundancy? :-)

That part about Soros & the machine behind her, yes, that’ll be a power to contend with (but wouldn’t those powers line up behind obama too?). The 5 million airheaded young, single women will be getting the pedicures & forget it’s election day.

It seems to me that a lot of the people I know who don’t like Bush (and are disgusted with republicans) also hate Hillary. And it’s for stupid reasons, none of the “GOOD” reasons. Most voters are ignorant about issues.

I always support losing candidates, because my views are in line with probably about 15-20% of the population, but I’m good at predicting what will appeal to the “average voter”, and Hillary’s just such a repulsive personality that I don’t see how she appeals to people in the same cult-like manner as Obama (& Huck).

However, I’m about ready to gouge my eyes out that either of these clowns have a shot at running the most powerful country in Western Civilization. Chilling. I see a lot of alcohol in my future.


74 posted on 01/19/2008 3:36:12 PM PST by I_like_good_things_too (Check the "Yes" box next to survival)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: abclily
Miss Hitlery will take Obama as a running mate, and they will win the election in November

Not even the Dems are that stupid. A female/black ticket would be crushed. Smart money is on former Virginia Governor Mark Warner as running mate. He's moderate, Southern, good businessman, was well-liked even by Republicans.
75 posted on 01/19/2008 3:36:20 PM PST by atomicweeder
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: Rooivalk

You are correct, our country is at stake. However, the question to me is who is the GOP candidate. Huckabee IMHO would be absolutely terrible. I keep having nightmares of those Carter years. If he gets in and is as bad as I think he is, then it would be years before GOP could ever recover.


76 posted on 01/19/2008 3:36:36 PM PST by mel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: KeyLargo

How many illegals voted for the RAT in Chief? I’d venture to say a lot of them. Vegas runs thanks to illegals (slaves).


77 posted on 01/19/2008 3:40:00 PM PST by Paulus Invictus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: proudpapa

Rush, to my surprise, thinks she will win against any Pubbie. If so, we are doomed!


78 posted on 01/19/2008 3:41:25 PM PST by Paulus Invictus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: proudpapa

Rush, to my surprise, thinks she will win against any Pubbie. If so, we are doomed!


79 posted on 01/19/2008 3:41:28 PM PST by Paulus Invictus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: KeyLargo

I apologize if this is posted somewhere, but can someone explain the raw numbers showing up? Romney has a number more than twice Hillary and Obama combined, and Ron Paul has more than either Hillary and Obama.


80 posted on 01/19/2008 3:48:43 PM PST by coramdeo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 121-137 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson