I’m not delusional, please, tell me why she’s a better candidate in a general with such high negatives, then Obama.
I think fewer republicans will stay home if she’s the candidate, and that swing state voters (Ohioans in particular) have very negative views of her. I.e., in the state that matters, I think she’s a weaker candidate than Obama. I could be wrong, but delusional?
There are perhaps 5 million young airhead women who have no idea about what happened in the 1990s -— the sexual assaults and then destroying the victims by Hillary. They will come out to vote because she is a woman. I saw several of these when I went to a Hillary organizational meeting. Today, she got 59% of the Dem women vote. To top it off, she is capable of vote fraud like nobody else. She is willing to conduct illegal activities like nobody else. She is willing to intimidate people like nobody else. The press largely either loves her or is very, very afraid of her. And Soros will spend half a billion dollars if that’s what it takes to get her elected.