Posted on 01/19/2008 1:22:20 PM PST by KeyLargo
Hillary Clinton wins Dem caucus in Nevada
January 19, 2008 Hillary Rodham Clinton has won the Democratic caucuses in Nevada.
Do you just like typing “vagina” so much that you don’t know how offensive you are.
Stop it I ask. It is disrespectful to all women,vulgar and disgusting.
No, the women will not be out getting pedicures. They will be out voting for Hillary.
Copy and click the link above to read an article that suggest that despite the raw vote in Nevada Obama won 13 delegates and The Evil One only won 12 delegates. If this is true, then Obama won Nevada or you can think of Nevada as a push (pun intended) for the Democrats.
But a very accurate description of the voter bloc, and the explanation of the “reason” for their vote.
So call it the bimbo vote or the flake vote or the retarded women vote.
I don’t get why you like to be vulgar but it is not something I like. I suspect many women find it disgusting.
I live in Los Angeles and get a lot of (unsolicited) email from the local “National Women’s Political Caucus” organization. They are practically breathless when they speak about Hillary. It is worrisome. Here comes socialism. It is also disgusting, since she’s married to (and supports the habits of) a sexual batterer and rapist.
I hope the stock market doesn’t tank from all the tax increases if this anti-civil society type wins.
Only companies receiving subsidies (corporate welfare) will be worth holding.
Any one with hard-fought productive skills (earning a high salary after slaving away for decades to get where they are) will, again, be threatened by the Jefferson’s unconstrained Democracy - two wolves & a sheep, voting on what to have for dinner.
Geez...
Well, how does HRC supposedly “win” the ‘Rat caucuses and get one fewer delegate than Obama?
No, actually you’re the only person to say so.
I don’t know. She ought to be beat anywhere in the United States. But Shes winning.... I Don’t like it
Only in a fair election, my FRiend.
My worry is that Hillary's operatives would have a hand in
- fraudulent votes cast (including illegal aliens and felons),
- miscounting of votes (more fore her, fewer for her opponent),
- and would unleash her assembled army of lawyers to disenfranchise all military votes from overseas as well as to challenge any GOP winner states.
Just look at (1) New Hampshire (alleged out-of-state voters) and (2) Nevada (law suites designed to take votes away from opponent).
And, these are just test runs for the real election, where the "news" media will be more willing to be accomplices.
I would think that Obama would not be considered as a running mate for Hitlery for many reasons, not the least of which would be the personal friction between the two.
And I wouldn't be so pessimistic about November. Her Royal Thighness will engender more ill-feeling against her than any major party candidate in American history, and for good reason! Romney would more than handle his own against her in face-to-face debates.
Here’s some “background stuff” against Hitlery that can’t be rebuffed at all:
Vincent Foster was murdered in 1993. Vincent Foster worked in the Clinton Administration and was her former law partner for many years and likely her one-time paramour. Vincent Foster’s murder was not investigated objectively by the feds, but rather covered up in about the most extensive cover-up of a crime in American history. Given these facts, Hitlery is one very hot suspect!
We’re all screwed if there is a 3rd party republican.
Bill couldn’t win without Perot and Hillary can’t win w/o Ron Paul.
And how good GOP organizations across the country are at detecting vote fraud and implimenting plans to stop it and negate it.
Democrats Hillary Rodham Clinton and Barack Obama split the spoils Saturday in Nevada presidential caucuses marred by late charges of dirty politics. John McCain and Mike Huckabee dueled for victory in a hard-fought Republican primary in South Carolina.
"This is one step on a long journey," Clinton told cheering supporters in Las Vegas. She captured the popular vote, but Obama edged her out for national convention delegates at stake, taking 13 to her 12.
So if Obama got more national convention delegates at stake, why is the MSM proclaiming that Her Royal Thighness “won”? (Yep, I don’t really have to ask that question.)
Don’t be so pessimistic yet. Wait until the GOP has a candidate and he (hopefully) comes out fighting.
And please tell the “National Women’s Political Caucus” that you’re not interested in receiving their pro-Hitlery mail anymore.
I agree. Obama may be bad, but not nearly as bad for the country as she would be.
Cannot believe she won, after playing the race card, and even trying to suppress the vote in NV!
1- All of the media went by the raw numbers.
2- Few, including us, knew of the screwball way in which the Democrats were distributing their delegates.
I hope that this primary season some people within the dem party will see her for who she truly is, a woman who will do absolutely anything to win.
Playing the race card, suppressing the vote through legal tactics......she will stop at NOTHING!
Hopefully some dems will wake up. More than a few have got to be bitter.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.