[don-o]

If I were voting in SC, I think I would have to conclude Fred will be gone next week...drink some Maalox...and vote for Huck. We can deal with Huck later.

Forgive me - but what in the hell are you thinking? Or, are you letting the MSM and dubious polling data do that for you?

[Timeout]

what in the hell are you thinking?

I'm thinking...well, what I said in my post.

As much as I regret it, those "dubious polls" all say the same thing: Fred has moved up, but not nearly enough. Is a miracle possible? Yes. But it doesn't look likely. :(

Given that, the most disastrous outcome would be a McCain victory. The media coronation train will be hard to stop.

Thus, I figure a Huck win in SC is the best we can expect today. Huck will never be the nominee. We can stop him in later states.

So, as I said before, that's what I'm thinking. Doesn't have anything to do with "letting the MSM" do my thinking for me.

[A Strict Constructionist]

“Forgive me - but what in the hell are you thinking?”

Your exactly right. Too many people think that they are strategists and statisticians and forget that it is best to vote your conviction on who is best for the country.

Those that vote the polls are victims of what I like to call the media/RINO’s “gullible strategy”.

Remember PT Barnum.

[CottonBall]

If I were voting in SC, I think I would have to conclude Fred will be gone next week...drink some Maalox...and vote for Huck. We can deal with Huck later.

Forgive me - but what in the hell are you thinking? Or, are you letting the MSM and dubious polling data do that for you?

When prop 187 was being voted on in California over a decade ago, the minute the polls opened, the MSM was reporting that it was being beaten, had no chance, and implied that everybody may as well give up. When the real results started coming in in the evening, it won by a landslide. Luckily, Californians were so enraged that they didn't let the MSM stopped them.

Don't let them do that to you now.