Posted on 01/14/2008 1:08:18 PM PST by TBBT
Here's the deal, folks: The New York Times has some damaging goods on John McCain, reportedly involving a female lobbyist. McCain threatened legal action if the Times printed the story. The Times backed off... for now. But you can be sure the Times will unload on McCain if he nails down the GOP nomination...
(Excerpt) Read more at spectator.org ...
This would have been unloaded two days before the election for sure. No wonder they want McCain.
Too bad papers are not covered by the Freedom of Information Act to force the story out. They manipulate stories as bad or worse than the government to push their agenda.
It could happen...
They’ll back off till he wins.
Someone else must know and could release it?
I have some damaging goods on Quin Hillyer, involving her fat promiscious mom
I was just going to say the exact same thing!
Yeah, c’mon! If this info really exists, then there is no way it will remain a secret. This is the age of the internet, for goodness sake.
Where is Drudge?
So is this the sex scandal involving a Senator/Prez candidate that was hinted at a few weeks ago?
I wonder who McCain will blame for this.....cause we know he never blames himself for any mistake he makes. See Amnesty, Campaign Finance Reform, Bush tax cuts, Keating Five, etc etc etc.
Never.
What? He couldn’t get it up
It looks as though Google has stopped issuing a warning about the American Spectator’s site. For a while, a search for the site would return a warning about malware.
I recall the LA Times was sitting on such a story. Seems like a couple very liberal papers are protecting someone.
Quin is a chick? An Eskimo, I know, but I thought male.
Back in October there was a thread about the LATimes having “dirt” on one of the Presidential candidates (it didn’t say which party.) Here’s the thread:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1919063/posts
If it were “goods” on Hillary and a female lobbyist? Never see the light of day. McCain ain’t my choice, although I could possibly vote for him if absolutely necessary, but the NYT wouldn’t change my mind either way.
I say McCain confronts it head on......
Hell, I’ve got a ton of flak on McCain. Trouble is everyone here knows about it.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.