Your logic completely escapes me. Military personnel are virtually owned by the federal government for the duration of their service. They don’t even have the same Constitutional rights as other residents of the USA, but live by the Uniform Code of Military Justice, as I understand it.
The free People of DC are entitled to ALL of the US Constitution’s protections. All of them. The Right of the People does not surround the District of Columbia, it included them. How could this be otherwise? You are baffling me.
I agree with you 100% I was just predicting what they may rule. I can see them saying that since DC is Federal Property it falls under different rules. It would not be fair, but I can see them doing something assinine like that.