1 posted on
01/11/2008 6:59:46 AM PST by
jdm
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-27 next last
To: jdm; SJackson; Allegra; ejonesie22; lormand
Ping and Ouch
This one is gonna sting.
2 posted on
01/11/2008 7:01:51 AM PST by
mnehring
To: Extremely Extreme Extremist; bcsco; Proud2BeRight; jmc813
A new twist worth looking at.
4 posted on
01/11/2008 7:06:57 AM PST by
mnehring
To: jdm
It appears that the good doctor is about to have an “Emperors New Clothes Moment”. His I did not know what was going on excus3e if developing some rather large holes. Still the Pualites will be along to tell us to “Pay no attention to that man behind the curtain”. The Wizard is being exposed for the cheap magician he really is.
6 posted on
01/11/2008 7:09:50 AM PST by
ontap
(Just another backstabbing conservative)
To: jdm
Is there nothing the Pubbies can do to distance themselves from this guy?
7 posted on
01/11/2008 7:11:29 AM PST by
9YearLurker
(Fred just keeps looking better and better)
To: jdm
His role in the single most effective piece of outreach of his organization, he explained to Wolf Blitzer last night, was as a publisher -- one who didn't bother to read his own publication. In other news, Hustler Magazine's Larry Flynt was shocked (SHOCKED) to find naked pictures in his magazine.
"I'm just a publisher, someone else takes the pictures," he croaked. "I thought we printed cross-stitch patterns."
8 posted on
01/11/2008 7:11:42 AM PST by
atomicpossum
(Replies must follow approved guidelines or you will be kill-filed without appeal.)
To: jdm
To: jdm
Heh heh.
Moralist preaching from republicans.
Pull the other one.
12 posted on
01/11/2008 7:15:59 AM PST by
Seruzawa
To: Revelation 911
Another pile-on thread by people who didn’t read the article...
To: jdm
He should have been disqualified months and months ago.
If our newsmedia were doing there jobs, instead of pimping another Bushhater, ie, Michael Moore.
His raising of bloodmoney from the UnAmerican Democrat Party members, and Alex Jones conspirazoids should have run him out of the country as a traitor.
But no, modern day Americans put tolerance as their highest virtue, so much so that we find ourselves with no others.
To: jdm
Ron Paul is such a lying weasel.
It's pathetic that so many losers on FR are destroying their reputations by defending this pustulent sack of traitorous effluvia.
23 posted on
01/11/2008 7:24:37 AM PST by
wideawake
(Why is it that so many self-proclaimed "Constitutionalists" know so little about the Constitution?)
To: jdm
The Claxton Army drinks as much Kool Aid as the RAT moonbats
28 posted on
01/11/2008 7:27:11 AM PST by
sticker
To: jdm
When the biggest libertarian magazine in the country abandons you, it’s time to fade away quietly.
29 posted on
01/11/2008 7:27:14 AM PST by
OCCASparky
(Steely-Eyed Killer of the Deep)
To: jdm
Very Clown Posseesque. Thanks for posting.
30 posted on
01/11/2008 7:28:23 AM PST by
jmc813
(Don't screw this up, vote for Thompson.)
To: jdm
38 posted on
01/11/2008 7:35:11 AM PST by
jmc813
(Don't screw this up, vote for Thompson.)
To: jdm
This could cost Ron Paul the Republican nomination for President. /sarc
46 posted on
01/11/2008 7:42:21 AM PST by
barryg
To: jdm
Well, we right-thinking, real conservatives have always suspected he was worse than a kook since so many of his previous denials were not plausible. Now, it’s clear he’s a liar, a fraud, a demagogue, and one who currys favor with racists while he advocates that we conform our foreign policy to the wishes of al Qaeda and Iran’s mad mullahs. He’s beyond a funny fool now.
77 posted on
01/11/2008 8:02:24 AM PST by
elhombrelibre
(Al Qaeda: enemy of civilization and humanity. Ron Paul: al Qaeda's puppet and mouthpiece.)
To: jdm
Its sad as a part of me really wants to believe.
He just has way top many weird things not to mention followers.
186 posted on
01/11/2008 8:56:23 AM PST by
NoLibZone
(Hillary 's loss will liberal repudiation of the Clinton years)
To: jdm
Why is so much energy being spent attacking Ron Paul, when some of that energy would be better spent attacking McCain?
211 posted on
01/11/2008 9:22:58 AM PST by
B Knotts
(Anybody but Giuliani!)
To: jdm
How does an Austrian Economist support Social Security?
I am seriously asking.
237 posted on
01/11/2008 10:38:09 AM PST by
NoLibZone
(Hillary 's loss will liberal repudiation of the Clinton years)
To: jdm
I could believe he didn’t approve these things before publication but I could never believe that he didn’t read the newsletters following publication. He should have raised hell at that time. He didn’t and therefor should be judges as if he were the author.
282 posted on
01/11/2008 12:44:36 PM PST by
aculeus
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-27 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson