Woo-hoo! You do realize that Luntz has all the credibility of Dan Rather, right?
“Woo-hoo! You do realize that Luntz has all the credibility of Dan Rather, right?”
On FR, credibility is in direct proportion to whether the subject in question agrees with the poster. It’s not an objective measure. You’ve been here longer than me, you should know that!
What’s sad is all the personal attack against Ron Paul - as opposed to critique of ideas.
Paul haters: try saying, ‘here’s why he’s wrong’ not ‘hes a loon!’