Posted on 01/10/2008 6:51:50 AM PST by rface
...bloggers across the nation keyed into the fact that 81 percent of New Hampshire votes were being counted on machines that an HBO documentary alleged are easily hacked........
.
AUSTIN – The results weren't even in when the blogosphere started to hum with a theory that sharply divided Democrats online: Barack Obama lost to Hillary Rodham Clinton in New Hampshire because the vote was rigged.
From Americablog.com to Crooks and Liars to several news blogs, readers posted their concerns – drawing the gleeful eye of conservative talk show host Rush Limbaugh on Wednesday morning, who pointed to a debate raging on Democratic Underground.
That site, which has more than 100,000 registered users, was alive with debate throughout the day – mainly between Obama supporters and Clinton fans.
"Please come back to your senses," one commenter wrote. "What is most disturbing is the fact some people are accusing the fellow Democrats of fraud. Please, dear reasonable Obama supporter, tell those people to stop."
(Excerpt) Read more at dallasnews.com ...
innereesting in that it neglects the mosst glaring flaw - same-day-voter-registration, which must account for thousands of fraudulent votes.
>I account for about 10 of these
You must have really good soap.
It probably was rigged. Funny how they thought it was OK to cheat when it was Bill then Gore and Kerry. Now they get scruples? lol I say karma can be painful.
That’s right—”only $10 away!”. Looks like she’s still alive at http://www.blackboxvoting.org/. She’s taking donations, too!
Yeah, that line of questioning could lead down all kinds of uncomfortable paths. Please shut up, before any detailed questions about Democrat conduct in Florida, 2000 or Ohio, 2004 start popping up. ;)
I never could keep all those factions straight in that mess, but I guess Kuchnich supporters are the POUM.
they did say they were out of ballots...make me wonder how many dead people got up out of the grave to vote!
You are so correct! Why bother with someone hacking machines when a state like NH allows anybody to vote. The key to this is in Bill Clinton's statement early in the voting day (despite all the polls) that this election would be much closer than anyone was predicting! Did he know something that all the pollsters did not know? Hillary's immaculate nomination would be severely damaged if she did not win in NH. The Clinton machine used the lax rules in NH to fix it!
I think it more likely that the pollsters were using questions that favored Obama thus enabling them to christen Her Thighness the new “Comeback Kid” much as Billy Jeff labeled himself in ‘92.
Didn’t need the Democrat-Lazurus phenomenon in NH - just bus people in from neighboring states.
Democrats are accusing Democrats of voter fraud...??? Whatever would give them such an idea???
Are you saying that all of those bussed in backers of hillary should not have been bused around and voted, you are just mean!! :^)
Kind of reminiscent of 1968 Chicago convention between Humphrey and McGovern.
Well, that was a civil war, too.
Actually if the netrooters dont get their way, it may be something like Chicago in 68.
“I do think that the hacking of the system is possible. Too much code, and too easy to leave a back door to get in and cause slight changes in the totals. And there is no paper trail to check results.”
Paperless voting machines are dangerous to the integrity of the voting process.
I say this as an electronics engineer who has spent many years designing similar “secured” systems.
How many among us would feel safe about ATM’s that didn’t give us receipts for deposits or withdrawals?
Reminds me of Stalingrad.
I’d agree with them.
Pinging DFU if he hasn’t seen this.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.