Posted on 01/09/2008 8:11:46 AM PST by Perdogg
1) Vote for McCain
2) Vote Dims - Kevorkian vote
3) Don't vote
4) Third party?
good post
Absolutely not. McShame is a wolf in sheep’s clothing.
I agree. With Hillary or Obama as President, congressional Dems and RINOs would have no cover. If McCain is to be the GOP's nominee, the broken glass one has to walk over looks a bit too dangerous.
He stands for less things I like than any of the R's, he has been responsible for many unspeakably stupid things no Republican should do, he's a Senator, he doesn't have a temperment I like.......
He can't really be our only choice in the end can he?
Arrrrrrrrggggghhhhh!!!!!!
yes, I do, and yes, I understand the point you are making also.
And so while we may not be as conservative as we used to be, I believe that 4 years of bad Democratic leadership could buck up this party to move right again.
Against Barak Hussein Obama or Her Majesty or [to be honest] any other Socialist, there is NO DOUBT, I would cast my vote for McCain!!
Does he have to keep clicking those balls together?....As long as thier his own....
If he picks Huck as V.P., I'm looking elsewhere.
I think McCain’s chances of winning the nomination are pretty remote. New Hampshire’s selection needn’t be given too much imortance, if any at all.
Of course I would. The alternative is a socialist in the White House.
NO!
In fact, I will not vote for anyone, other than FRed Thompson or Duncan Hunter. Everyone else can let Conservatism go south if they choose to, I don’t.
Each and every time we vote for a RINO, we are saying we really don’t believe in our own principles enough to stand up for them...and we lose ground.
We are also sending a message to the GOP, who has abandoned us, that we are their sheep.
Only Fred and Duncan have the core beliefs of Conservatism as their platforms.
He won’t win.....
I have no trouble voting for him for those reasons you mention. I would feel better if he would express a committment to appoint strict constructionist judges, but I'm pretty sure he would appoint judges who are vastly preferable to Clinton's. He's also clearly ethical - another difference with HRC.
No.
I made a promise that if either McCain or Frudy got the nomination, I would vote for myself or third party.
But he sure appoints the judges that make these laws from the bench.
But hey, if you like Ruth Ginsberg types, so be it.
WEEEEEE, 3rd party huh guys, looks like we will have Hillary or Hussein Obama! Yeahhhh its 1992 all over again !Thanks a *&^%$#@! lot.
I don’t know. Just an observation, though. If McQueeg (God forbid) is the nominee, he better choose a young VP. His age and his mental state do not bode well for his completing a full term in office.
4.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.