Posted on 01/07/2008 10:57:48 AM PST by xzins
Cool enough. lol.
KH: “Romney is the only major Republican candidate supporting a Federal Marriage Amendment.”
FALSE. National frontrunner and Iowa winner Mike Huckabee supports a federal amendment and helped lead the campaign to pass a marriage amendment to his state constitution.
Romney as a candidate for gov in 2002 OPPOSED a marriage amendment for his state’s constitution.
Then, sticking his finger in the air, flip-flopped on the issue. Which leaves neither side trusting him.
Depending on the wording of a “no new tax pledge” it would be contrary to one’s sworn duty to defend the USA.
In the case of all out war, taxes would have to be raised.
If there is no provision for that in the document, it would be honest NOT to sign it, and either dishonest or inexperienced to sign it.
He burnt bridges with LCR as well as with conservative Republicans.
This man should not be put in charge of our military.
I'm trying to figure how the 82d would have been with open homosexuals when I served.
Glad I never got to see that.
If you can't appreciate the pure beauty of the violin after hearing this, something's wrong with your ears.
Or you can get raw with these strings.
How about this gamechanger from America's Got Talent (which they SHOULD have won).
And finally, this, dedicated to the one and only rdb2, whose eyes are growing dim.
Either way, the violin is sweet yet LETHAL.
Do it!
Thank you for digging up this old thread and reminding us that Mitt Romney supported gays serving openly in the military.
We need to remember such things.
I have to call BS on that just because it si such a stupid thing to post. Who are they going to support instead of uber-liberal Mitt, Santorum?
Gosh, that would mean that a helluva lot of gays would lose their jobs in couture, theater, advertising, photography, journalism, and girls' physical education, wouldn't it?
Well, wouldn't it? ..... no? Whaaaaat? <theatrical puzzlement>
Well, what exactly does it mean, then?
</s>
Guy's as reliable as a wet noodle as to his word on what he'll support ....... and as PFLAGgy as they come.
Freepmail wagglebee to subscribe or unsubscribe from the homosexual agenda ping list.
Be sure to click the FreeRepublic homosexual agenda keyword search link for a list of all related articles. We don't ping you to all related articles so be sure to click the previous link to see the latest articles.
Add keywords homosexual agenda to flag FR articles to this ping list.
One of the many reasons - and a huge one - why Romney is absolutely a vile candidate and it will be an incredible disaster if somehow or other he is crammed down our gullets. If he is crammed, he will lose. He's really not very different from 0h0m0 - who said that "he and Michelle" will be the "best friends gays ever had" in the WH. Romney is no different in this regard.
I literally shudder and my skin crawls just thinking about Romney.
you honestly cannot believe any of what you just wrote can you?
Romney is for the homosexual agenda, this is his letter.
The man states one thing and then changes his position based oan who he is talking to and only the dopes on out party would think Romney is capable of telling the truth
what astounds me so that we have so many dopes on our side voting for him and then even a couple come on here trying to say Romney is not pro homo agenda.
Have you heard anything new from Romney on DADT lately?
Based upon what I have found out, Romney has been a supporter and promoter of homosexuslizing the military from way back. As such, any claims by him stating that he has simply chosen to accept the recent repeal as the "law of the land" are actually just more progressive supporting lies.
Unless Romney has stated nothing new, whether it be a flip or a flop, I guess the best bet is to assume Romney will not lead any attempt to repeal the homosexualization of our military.
Romney has been solidly behind the gay movement for years. He will not reverse the decision to allow open gays to be part of our military.
I can’t recall exactly where, but I believe he was even asked the question. Wasn’t it in one of the debates?
Well, this debacle is certainly separating the wheat from the chaff. The principled conservatives from the lockstep Republicans.
Freepmail wagglebee to subscribe or unsubscribe from the homosexual agenda ping list.
Be sure to click the FreeRepublic homosexual agenda keyword search link for a list of all related articles. We don't ping you to all related articles so be sure to click the previous link to see the latest articles.
Add keywords homosexual agenda to flag FR articles to this ping list.
This thread needs another bump.
I just won’t be able to force myself to vote for him. I am so hoping for a revolution at the convention. This is such a nightmare. A real principles conservative Republic could beat 0bummer into a pulp.
Hi, wagglebee!
I'll try to get back to this tomorrow.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.