Posted on 01/05/2008 7:35:32 PM PST by libh8er
Absolutely agree!
I, I, I, I, I, Getting to sound like Bill.
Bush's Fault "mention" Scorecard.
Richardson - 1
Hillary - 5
Obama - 4
Edwards -1
Change "mention" count.
Edwards - 162
Hillary - 102
Obama - 108
Richardson - 31
I kept a scorecard during the debate. The "Change" quote isn't completely
accurate because I couldn't keep up and had to estimate a little bit.
You have a point; but don’t rule her out.
Can you imagine Hillary vs McInsane?
Egad. After watching that nonsense, it’s hard to imagine voting for any of those people for dogcatcher, much less any higher office.
Reference bump ... Thanks! ;-)
He has a right to his viewpoint, I would think. A LOT of people are extremely disappointed with Bush. I’m amazed (but elated) he finally found his veto pen, myself.
America's Ex-Wife
Hillary is used to a media that has been presented with a list of questions that they will be allowed to ask her. OR, a room full of *planted* questioners. This has worked very well for her in the past .. but it won't work in this sort of forum.
She is used to getting softball questions and as a result, she has never learned to answer tough questions. The first thing she does is get angry. She is not used to people challenging her .. how dare they?? The next thing she does is throw a tantrum and start whining about it .. i.e. they are picking on me because I am a woman.
Look at how poorly she did when Russert didn't play by her rules. And remember how angry she was after? The press clearly understands that Hillary doesn't just get mad .. she gets even. If she is elected she will completely shut them out of the WH.. she may try to get them fired .. and she might even sic the IRS on them.
Hillary loves to cite her *experience* but she really doesn't have any experience at answering questions that are shot from the hip. She ought to try the rude and obnoxious questions that Republicans are CONSTANTLY asked!
And as for her experience .. she tries to present herself as a co-president who was in on all the big decisions. She never sat in on any of the security meetings. She was married to a president, who publicly humiliated her, and treated her so badly, they were hardly ever on speaking terms. I would say that hardly qualifies as a co-presidency.
LOL LOL LOL !!!
Great pictures!
>> Black voters won’t vote Republican.
Oh, they might. They might also stay home if Clinton snatches the prize away from Obama in a way they perceive to be unfair. And they are good at perceiving unfairness. Plus Clinton is easy to regard as a dirty player.
Even Obama had to admit we can't start all over with medical care . . .
Thanks.
CHANGE except NOTHING CHANGED!!!!!
1. Clinton SOS performance including the so called “moment”.
2. Obama (Jimmy Carter II) no, specifics & 100% out of it on forgein policy!!!!
Mason Dixon
That's what I am getting. They can't do it all. If it weren't so damn serious, I almost laughed at her 35 years experience. Well I have news for you. I have 35 years and then some of experience, too, can't say I changed much which is probably a good thing. Change isn't always good.
I'm up too early, didn't "get" your #1. #2. Absolutely. Only a couple in the whole lineup that I'd even consider entrusting foreign policy to. And he ain't it. Maybe three Republicans get it, not sure which, but only one Dem seemed to have a clue. Why? They got too bogged down in negativity.
You're right, she did.
You guys must have seen a different video than I did. I saw this part of the debate live, and to me she came across like Tony Soprano's reaction to being slapped and told he's a fat, ugly homo.
I see some “Don’t pick on the girl” sentiments on this thread....interesting.
Her main problem is the more you get to know her the less you like her, especially for women. Titanic.
Pray for W and Our Troops
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.