To: madprof98
The shoplifter was NOT a customer. He clearly violated the ‘custom’ of the economic exchange of value for value. He was a thief.
To: nonsporting
"The shoplifter was NOT a customer. He clearly violated the ‘custom’ of the economic exchange of value for value. He was a thief." Precisely, hope he gets a better job and stops by for a visit to his former employer.
I know what I'd tell u'm.
12 posted on
12/29/2007 6:23:10 AM PST by
#1CTYankee
(That's right, I have no proof. So what of it??)
To: nonsporting
The shoplifter was NOT a customer.
Couldn't you argue it the other way too? He punched out, so technically he wasn't an employee at the time.
To argue that the company can control your conduct 24-7, even off-work, is equivalent to slavery.
To: nonsporting; SunkenCiv; grellis
bttt
The shoplifter was NOT a customer... He was a thief.
112 posted on
06/04/2008 8:14:02 AM PDT by
george76
(Ward Churchill : Fake Indian, Fake Scholarship, and Fake Art)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson