Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

General Petreaus at a Brokered Convention (Vanity)
Greg F | 12/24/07 | Greg F

Posted on 12/24/2007 8:08:12 AM PST by Greg F

How about General Patreaus as our candidate chosen at a brokered convention?

Why not make this a referendum on sanity?


TOPICS: Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: 2008rncconvention; petreaus
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-79 next last
To: purpleraine
If we'd stop savaging our bunch, we'd see that we have 3-4 candidates better than anyone the dems can put forth.

An understatement is there ever was one. Our worst ticket (Guilani-Huckabee) would be better than their best ticket (Biden-Richardson) in terms of competence.

21 posted on 12/24/2007 8:28:45 AM PST by Vigilanteman (Are there any men left in Washington? Or are there only cowards? Ahmad Shah Massoud)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: purpleraine
If we'd stop savaging our bunch, we'd see that we have 3-4 candidates better than anyone the dems can put forth.

An understatement is there ever was one. Our worst ticket (Guilani-Huckabee) would be better than their best ticket (Biden-Richardson) in terms of competence.

22 posted on 12/24/2007 8:28:46 AM PST by Vigilanteman (Are there any men left in Washington? Or are there only cowards? Ahmad Shah Massoud)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ASA Vet; purpleraine
If I could jump into your dialogue here; I see only one viable Conservative candidate and that is Fred Thompson.

Out of the GOP field, my second choice is Duncan Hunter but I think he's "out of the hunt". I could vote for Huckabee but IMO, a Baptist preacher has the same chance of being elected POTUS as that proverbial snowball in hell. I could vote for McCain against any of the Dems and I could hold my nose and vote for Romney or Rudy.
23 posted on 12/24/2007 8:31:53 AM PST by no dems (FRED THOMPSON: The only Conservative running who can beat Hillary or Obama.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Neoliberalnot
We should all respect what the Bard once wrote. “First we kill all the barristers. (Wow, that would mean all the politicians in D.C.) Then we start over.
24 posted on 12/24/2007 8:32:07 AM PST by Doc91678 (Doc91678)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Vigilanteman; purpleraine
If we'd stop savaging our bunch,

They are not our bunch, they belong to the RNC and the Drive by Media.

25 posted on 12/24/2007 8:33:59 AM PST by itsahoot (Gingrich: "We don't have a peace process. We have a surrender process." (Duncan Hunter gets it.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Greg F
I think the good General is needed elsewhere.
26 posted on 12/24/2007 8:35:36 AM PST by BallyBill (Serial Hit-N-Run poster)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Greg F
Just like with General Colin Powell, just because someone is a brilliant military leader doesn’t mean he has true conservative political philosophy.

The Dems have the same the same problem with General Clark, ex-leader of NATO. The difference between the two parties being that the GOP backed away from Powell when people began to understand his beliefs while the Dems have pushed Clark into a leadership position despite how rabid a moonbat he is.

27 posted on 12/24/2007 8:42:11 AM PST by theBuckwheat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rightwingintelligentsia
>>>From what I understand, Ulysses S. Grant was not-so-hot as a president.<<<

I don't think Petraeus drinks as much as Grant.

However, lets let Petraeus finish the job in Iraq....he's doing a supurb job. After he gets back, there will be plenty of time to see if he would be a Great Conservative President.

He's a great possibility for 2012....but lets see how he performs in Political Warfare before we rush to print bumperstickers.

28 posted on 12/24/2007 8:44:29 AM PST by HardStarboard (Take No Prisoners - We're Out Of Qurans)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Greg F

A military person would seem to have a chance, politically, only AFTER he had won a major war, not while he is conducting it.

General Swartzcoff was probably the last best chance to date that a military person had, as he had won Gulf War I.


29 posted on 12/24/2007 8:48:08 AM PST by TomGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Greg F
Petraeus not interested in Presidency. Not quite a "Sherman" though ...
30 posted on 12/24/2007 8:48:55 AM PST by sono (Washington, DC. You will never find a more wretched hive of scum and villainy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Greg F; Grut
Petraeus, my Favorite Dark Horse.

Compared to this bunch of weasels (OK except Duncan, whio can't draw flies) no friggin' contest. OK., OK, maybe Thompson ain't such a bad guy. Wake him up and we'll talk.

31 posted on 12/24/2007 8:50:09 AM PST by Kenny Bunk (Round up the Dark Horses, boys. This herd of contenders ain't makin' it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: ASA Vet

I think the top four could beat Hill and through in Hunter for good measure.


32 posted on 12/24/2007 8:51:46 AM PST by purpleraine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: itsahoot

Well, at least they’re a bunch!


33 posted on 12/24/2007 8:57:04 AM PST by purpleraine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: no dems

I guess I’d vote for the lesser of two evils in case we get the “wrong” one. But I think almost any of the repubs would be preferable to the alternative.


34 posted on 12/24/2007 8:58:20 AM PST by purpleraine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Night Hides Not

“We do have several good candidates, and the fight is going to the convention floor.”

Compared to the Dems, we DO have several good candidates. I would love to see a brokered convention - I think it would be great publicity, and ultimately unify the party.

I think we would be in the best shape if Thompson won such a convention running against either Dem OR against either Dem and Bloomberg (assuming MB runs third party).

I’m very optimistic about a Republican winning the Presidency.


35 posted on 12/24/2007 9:03:12 AM PST by Eccl 10:2 (Pray for the peace of Jerusalem - Ps 122:6)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: no dems

I will agree. I’ll vote Hunter as a backup.


36 posted on 12/24/2007 9:05:23 AM PST by GAB-1955 (Kicking and Screaming into the Kingdom of Heaven.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Greg F

Harry Truman said generals make lousy presidents—too much pride and they aren’t used to having to take orders from those they lead (citizens vs soldiers)..
Ike wasn’t too bad but he could have been better and Harry hated him.Still,there is a point there—look at Grant.


37 posted on 12/24/2007 9:09:50 AM PST by Happy Rain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Greg F

Maybe he can clean out the leftist insurgents on capital hill.


38 posted on 12/24/2007 9:10:14 AM PST by Mogollon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: theBuckwheat

Of course, Wesley “Ashley Wilkes” Clark was somewhat less than brilliant.


39 posted on 12/24/2007 9:11:34 AM PST by sono (Washington, DC. You will never find a more wretched hive of scum and villainy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: theBuckwheat

Clark was no “brilliant” military leader...he was/is an idiot.

The Balkan Wars were/are a fiasco...and the fact it never became a ground war for us is the only saving grace for that misery, it would have been poorly led by Clark (being the NATO Allied Commander)

My favorite memory of Clark’s incompetence was when he ordered a British General to take an airbase that had been siezed by the Russians (since the Russians wanted to assert their influence in the region) by force if necessarry...the British General’s reply was “No, sir. I am not going to start WWIII for you.”

Wesley Clark...is niether the first or the last buffoon to hold a flag officers rank...


40 posted on 12/24/2007 9:15:35 AM PST by in hoc signo vinces ("Houston, TX...a waiting quagmire for jihadis.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-79 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson