Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Parsing. Clintonian. Ouch.
1 posted on 12/22/2007 7:04:51 AM PST by Leisler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-51 next last
To: Leisler
The real story is, the Romneys have distinguished themselves as passionate and stalwart supporters of civil rights for blacks--long before it was popular.

You're a small-minded and nasty tempered soul, Leisler.

2 posted on 12/22/2007 7:08:21 AM PST by JCEccles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Leisler; SE Mom; Politicalmom; Reagan Man; jdm; RockinRight; ejonesie22; greyfoxx39; Fred; ...
Mitt Romney continued to cite a 1967 book reference as proof his father marched for civil rights with Martin Luther King Jr. even as the author insisted he has no evidence to back up the claim.

What a putz!

This story has legs and people are turning off to Slick Willard. This morning, Rasmussen reports this:

New polling data released today shows that Hillary Clinton and Mitt Romney have the highest level of core opposition among the leading Presidential candidates. Forty-seven percent (47%) are poised to vote against each of them.

Imagine that! Slick Willard's negatives are as high as Hillary's!

The GOP can't afford to make that mistake: a liberal liar as unpopular as Hillary.

3 posted on 12/22/2007 7:09:25 AM PST by Petronski (Reject the liberal superfecta: huckabee, romney, giuliani, mccain)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Petronski

Calling out the vermin to feast on Leisler’s manure?


4 posted on 12/22/2007 7:10:37 AM PST by JCEccles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Leisler

Ah yes, Leisler, you have been subjected to the Romney Sleaze Machine’s Prime Directive:

When a poster criticizes Willard, Team Willard must attack that poster.


5 posted on 12/22/2007 7:11:25 AM PST by Petronski (Reject the liberal superfecta: huckabee, romney, giuliani, mccain)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Leisler
Mitt Romney continued to cite a 1967 book reference as proof his father marched for civil rights with Martin Luther King Jr.

But yesterday Mitt was saying the I saw was 'figurative'.

Mitt, get your story straight!!!!
6 posted on 12/22/2007 7:11:50 AM PST by TomGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Leisler
two members of the Grosse Pointe Historical Society said yesterday King never set foot in Grosse Pointe in 1963 and they woud have known if George Romney marched with him.

And, as posted yesterday, two other witnesses recall the event and support the version discussed in the book. There is a book reference, a recollection by Romney and others, as well as a lack of recollection on the part of others still. Who cares?

7 posted on 12/22/2007 7:12:02 AM PST by outofstyle (My Ride's Here)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: All

Can we just drop this whole story and move on to something important like maybe who’s the best man to protect us from terrorism and the democrats?


9 posted on 12/22/2007 7:12:44 AM PST by McGruff (A "Big Time" Fred Thompson supporter!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Leisler; Petronski
The real story is, the Romneys have distinguished themselves as passionate and stalwart supporters of civil rights for blacks--long before it was popular.

You're small-minded and nasty tempered souls, Leisler and Petronski.

10 posted on 12/22/2007 7:12:53 AM PST by JCEccles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Leisler

Yes, Leisler, and in other threads to which you have contributed other evidence outside this 1967 book has been adduced, which you conveniently left out. Posting this is what’s called a half-truth, which is Clinton-speak for a lie.


11 posted on 12/22/2007 7:13:10 AM PST by Dionysiusdecordealcis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Leisler
They are making way to big an issue of this.

It's clear George Romney joined civil rights marches when it counted ( as opposed to defending Jim Crow as a certain Tennessee senator did whose Nobel and Oscar winning son also sought the presidency). If Mitt's memory of his teenaged years aren't perfect, I won't hold it against him.

15 posted on 12/22/2007 7:14:16 AM PST by Tribune7 (Dems want to rob from the poor to give to the rich)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: All

The real story is, the Romneys have distinguished themselves as passionate and stalwart supporters of civil rights for blacks--long before it was popular.


18 posted on 12/22/2007 7:15:31 AM PST by JCEccles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Leisler; Petronski
The real story is, the Romneys have distinguished themselves as passionate and stalwart supporters of civil rights for blacks--long before it was popular.

You're small-minded and nasty tempered souls, Leisler and Petronski.

21 posted on 12/22/2007 7:17:08 AM PST by JCEccles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: All

The real story is, the Romneys have distinguished themselves as passionate and stalwart supporters of civil rights for blacks—long before it was popular.


23 posted on 12/22/2007 7:18:21 AM PST by JCEccles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: All

The real story is, the Romneys have distinguished themselves as passionate and stalwart supporters of civil rights for blacks—long before it was popular.


27 posted on 12/22/2007 7:19:12 AM PST by JCEccles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Leisler

The real story is, the Romneys have distinguished themselves as passionate and stalwart supporters of civil rights for blacks—long before it was popular.


29 posted on 12/22/2007 7:19:53 AM PST by JCEccles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: All

The real story is, the Romneys have distinguished themselves as passionate and stalwart supporters of civil rights for blacks—long before it was popular.


31 posted on 12/22/2007 7:20:31 AM PST by JCEccles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: All

The real story is, the Romneys have distinguished themselves as passionate and stalwart supporters of civil rights for blacks—long before it was popular.


32 posted on 12/22/2007 7:20:55 AM PST by JCEccles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Leisler

The real story is, the Romneys have distinguished themselves as passionate and stalwart supporters of civil rights for blacks—long before it was popular.


34 posted on 12/22/2007 7:21:15 AM PST by JCEccles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Leisler

The real story is, the Romneys have distinguished themselves as passionate and stalwart supporters of civil rights for blacks—long before it was popular.


35 posted on 12/22/2007 7:21:30 AM PST by JCEccles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Petronski

The real story is, the Romneys have distinguished themselves as passionate and stalwart supporters of civil rights for blacks—long before it was popular.


36 posted on 12/22/2007 7:21:55 AM PST by JCEccles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-51 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson