Can we just drop this whole story and move on to something important like maybe who’s the best man to protect us from terrorism and the democrats?
What a novel idea!
My take is that there are two key issues-- the war on terror and border security.
Duncan Hunter is great on both.
Fred is good on the war on terror and so-so on border security.
Mitt is about the same as Fred or possibly a bit behind in that my perception is that he wouldn't rank high on border security, but would probably do the right thing because it is popular.
Rudy and McCain are good on the war on terror but totally untrustworthy on border security.
Huckabee is as bad or worse than Rudy and McCain on border security and probably not as good in the war on terror.
People should be doing this analysis on every major issue and weighing them accordingly.
If I were Hillary, the persons I would least like to run against would be (1) Romney and (2) Giuliani. Giuliani has too many personal issues. So Romney should be her biggest fear. I want the person who she fears the most to run as the Republican candidate. Because Democrats (okay, Republicans have helped) have already done enough to destroy my country. So I want whomever can beat the Hildabeast - first and foremost - because whoever the Rs put up will be the lesser of two evils by a country mile.