What’s the dateline on that Time article? From greenlight to release on most movies is about two years, so nothing in response to Nancy’s “request” since becoming speaker would be released yet, that would be 2008 early 2009 at the earliest. Hopefully CWW will at least do better than the others and Hollywood might decide that makes it worth taking another chance, a lot will depend on how expensive it was to make too, $30 million budget movies are easier to be profitable than $100 million budget, if it’s closer to the former then it could still hit the black.
Time articles were published Dec 06, 2007 and Dec 24, 2007. No, the anti-war movies were produced very quickly this year on extremely low budgets, even Lions for Lambs, ($10-32 million production costs with lots of contributed “points” players), and were backed by the Democrats-Soros Shadow Party per the “Pelosi Nov 2006 Directive” - which I/we know for a fact. Look at the release dates of the liberal hack-job movies below – they tell the election year cycle story.
Charlie Wilson’s War was also produced very quickly this year on an extremely low budget. It’s initial interest and ticket sales are being greatly hurt by being released behind the below movies. And remember CWW was going to be another Soros Shadow Party hit job movie before several GOP PAC’s did something about it in a major kicked some arse win. The steam is building on CWW and it’s future appears good at this juncture. However, the Dems-SSP maggots are now writing bad reviews on the movie, bagging the MSM public opinions polls, and hitting the major movie sites’ user rating polls. - FlA
Total Worldwide Box Office Revenue
In the Valley of Elah: $12,851,486 , Released: 09.14.07 (BOM Rating: C)
Rendition: $17,055,746, Released 10.19.07 (BOM Rating: C)
Lions for Lambs: $47,111,450, Released 11.09.07 (BOM Rating: D)
- - Starring: Robert Redford, Meryl Streep, Tom Cruise, and Michael Peña
Redacted: $220,307, Released 11.16.07 (BOM Rating: F)