Time articles were published Dec 06, 2007 and Dec 24, 2007. No, the anti-war movies were produced very quickly this year on extremely low budgets, even Lions for Lambs, ($10-32 million production costs with lots of contributed points players), and were backed by the Democrats-Soros Shadow Party per the Pelosi Nov 2006 Directive - which I/we know for a fact. Look at the release dates of the liberal hack-job movies below they tell the election year cycle story.
Charlie Wilsons War was also produced very quickly this year on an extremely low budget. Its initial interest and ticket sales are being greatly hurt by being released behind the below movies. And remember CWW was going to be another Soros Shadow Party hit job movie before several GOP PACs did something about it in a major kicked some arse win. The steam is building on CWW and its future appears good at this juncture. However, the Dems-SSP maggots are now writing bad reviews on the movie, bagging the MSM public opinions polls, and hitting the major movie sites user rating polls. - FlA
Total Worldwide Box Office Revenue
In the Valley of Elah: $12,851,486 , Released: 09.14.07 (BOM Rating: C)
Rendition: $17,055,746, Released 10.19.07 (BOM Rating: C)
Lions for Lambs: $47,111,450, Released 11.09.07 (BOM Rating: D)
- - Starring: Robert Redford, Meryl Streep, Tom Cruise, and Michael Peña
Redacted: $220,307, Released 11.16.07 (BOM Rating: F)
That could be one thing that hurt them. Hollywood’s not good at making movies fast anymore, it’ll show on the screen.
I don’t think they tell and election year cycle, 2008 is the election, 2007 is the part of the election cycle when people that are over addicted to politics are paying attention, but most everybody else doesn’t give a damn. If you want to release a movie to change an election you do it October of 2008 not 2007.