[nhoward14]

Because we all know the National Enquirer checks, re-checks, and then checks again.

[billhilly]

Clinton dirty tricks, to be blamed on the VRWC.

[Bob J]

They’ve hit a few winners.

[TomGuy]

Because we all know the National Enquirer checks, re-checks, and then checks again.

And just a co-inky-dink that the NE was purchased by a strong Clintonian a few years ago.

[NE was the publication that actually made the Lewinsky scandal known nationally.]

[Doomonyou]

Because we all know the National Enquirer checks, re-checks, and then checks again.

Yeah, if you want real News, you have to read the "Weekly World News."

[lapster]

Let me put it this way: if NE ever sites you as being in your “brave last days,” you’d better go get measured for a pine box. And I don’t care if you’re feeling like a million bucks when the articles runs! IN short, they’re more accurate than most of the leftwing mainstream media.

[napscoordinator]

Because we all know the National Enquirer checks, re-checks, and then checks again.

The same paper that consistently tries to sell us that the Bush’s are getting divorced!!! I go to the grocery store and glance at the cover and they are always divorcing but you never hear it from the MSM.

[PapaBear3625]

Because we all know the National Enquirer checks, re-checks, and then checks again.

Stories about BatBoy and Bigfoot aside, libelous stories about real people WILL get them sued if they have nothing to back up their allegations. Their legal dept is not suicidal

[PeteB570]

If its not headlined at CNN I’ll know its true.

[Defiant]

National Enquirer is where Hillary launders all her ill-gotten information so that it can’t be tied directly to her. It’s a shot across the bow to all of those who would cross she who shan’t be named.

[pissant]

THey are better than the NY Times.

[Plutarch]

Because we all know the National Enquirer checks, re-checks, and then checks again.

The National Enquirer actually has a pretty good track record on this sort of thing.

[Plutarch]

Because we all know the National Enquirer checks, re-checks, and then checks again.

The National Enquirer actually has a pretty good track record on this sort of thing.

[GovernmentIsTheProblem]

“Because we all know the National Enquirer checks, re-checks, and then checks again.”

Actually their reporting became very reliable after a number of defamation suits.

[rod1]

The National Enquirer is owned or run by a Clintanoid, I think??

[Checkers]

“Because we all know the National Enquirer checks, re-checks, and then checks again.”

The National Enquirer is more credible than the New Republic or the New York Times.

[TruthWillWin]

Sadly they are as accurate as the MSM.

[KoRn]

"Because we all know the National Enquirer checks, re-checks, and then checks again."

I'd wager they are more accurate than CBS News or the New York Times. lol

[bannie]

I read the Nat’l Enquirer—because some fiction can be fun.

STILL, they are correct about 20% of the time (From my “scientific” study!!!).

[NotJustAnotherPrettyFace]

Hey don’t laugh. We all should have paid attention when the National Enquirer broke the Gennifer Flowers story!!!!

[EQAndyBuzz]

“Because we all know the National Enquirer checks, re-checks, and then checks again.”

At least they do a better job then the NY Slimes?