Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Abortion Poll Finds Americans' Attitudes Moving in Pro-Life Direction
Life News ^ | 12/17/07 | Steven Ertelt

Posted on 12/17/2007 4:36:26 PM PST by wagglebee

Washington, DC (LifeNews.com) -- A new poll on the topic of abortion finds that the attitude Americans have on the controversial political issue is moving in the pro-life direction. The Washington Post /ABC news survey find a six percent shift in public opinion towards the pro-life direction in the last six months.

The media outlets conducted a poll from December 6 to 9 of 1,136 American adults and the survey contained a three percent margin of error.

The poll asked respondents, "Do you think abortion should be legal in all cases, legal in most cases, illegal in most cases or illegal in all cases?"

The wording of the poll is cause for some concern because it doesn't identify when abortions are done so respondents can identify the exact cases when they support or oppose abortions.

While the Alan Guttmacher Institute, a research arm of Planned Parenthood, shows that fewer than two percent of all abortions are done in cases of rape, incest or to save the mother's life, most Americans think those "hard case" abortions occur much more often.

Still, the poll is instructive because it finds the pro-life margin is increasing.

The latest results find that 53 percent of Americans think abortion should be legal with 18 percent saying in all cases and 35 percent saying in most cases.

The survey found 44 percent of Americans take a pro-life position saying abortions should be illegal, with 27 percent saying most should be illegal and 17 percent saying all abortions should be prohibited.

That 53-44 percent split is a change from the same Washington Post-ABC News survey conducted in July, which found a 57-42 percentage point split.

That means the pro-abortion side has seen its margin shrink in the poll from 15 percent to 9 percent in the span of six months.

Other surveys with more accurate questions on when Americans oppose abortion find a pro-life split with about 55 percent opposing most or all abortions and 45 percent wanting to keep most or all abortions legal.

A recent Fox News poll reveals that a majority of Americans oppose the overwhelming majority of abortions that take place in the United States and a Bloomberg/Los Angeles Times survey found 50 percent of Americans opposed all or almost all abortions.

Surveys from CBS News reveal that a majority of Americans oppose abortions in about 98 percent of all cases.



TOPICS: Culture/Society; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: abortion; moralabsolutes; polls; prolife; trends
While the Alan Guttmacher Institute, a research arm of Planned Parenthood, shows that fewer than two percent of all abortions are done in cases of rape, incest or to save the mother's life, most Americans think those "hard case" abortions occur much more often.

The ONLY reason that people think these happen more often is because the rape/incest approach is repeated ad nauseam by the abortionists.

1 posted on 12/17/2007 4:36:28 PM PST by wagglebee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: cgk; Coleus; cpforlife.org; narses; 8mmMauser

Pro-Life Ping


2 posted on 12/17/2007 4:36:52 PM PST by wagglebee ("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 230FMJ; 49th; 50mm; 69ConvertibleFirebird; Aleighanne; Alexander Rubin; An American In Dairyland; ..
Moral Absolutes Ping!

Freepmail wagglebee or little jeremiah to subscribe or unsubscribe from the moral absolutes ping list.

FreeRepublic moral absolutes keyword search
[ Add keyword moral absolutes to flag FR articles to this ping list ]


3 posted on 12/17/2007 4:37:21 PM PST by wagglebee ("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee
Not to mention * morning after regrets * turning into rape/incest in order to have a reason *sniff* to abort the baby.

Once women take back the responsibility for their own behaviors maybe they won't find themselves in the pregnancy predicament.

Womens' groups made it too easy for too many women to find an excuse for their promiscous behavior and subsequent abortions.

But what goes around comes around --> psychological problems in dealing with infanticide as well as the correllation between abortion and breast cancer (pre 1970 there were hardly any breast cancer cases --> post Roe vs Wade --> hundreds of thousands of breast cancer cases in which those lovely nonprofits like the American Cancer Society et al trot out the victims ... victims my foot... they're perps getting their just rewards for killing their babies.

4 posted on 12/17/2007 4:46:06 PM PST by xtinct (I was the next door neighbor kid's imaginary friend.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: xtinct

I agree with you completely.


5 posted on 12/17/2007 4:47:41 PM PST by wagglebee ("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee
17 percent saying all abortions should be prohibited.

Therefore, 82% believe abortion should be legal in at least some circumstances.

That is depressing.

6 posted on 12/17/2007 5:08:35 PM PST by trumandogz (Hunter Thompson 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee
should be legal with 18 percent saying in all cases

Only 18 percent of Americans would support Roe v Wade if they understood it.

7 posted on 12/17/2007 5:10:08 PM PST by Tribune7 (Dems want to rob from the poor to give to the rich)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: trumandogz

Read this though, the majority oppose it in all but cases of rape and incest (which only represent 2% of abortions):

http://lifenews.com/nat3389.html


8 posted on 12/17/2007 5:13:06 PM PST by wagglebee ("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

Clearly they also support it if the life of the mother is severely endangered, which is the Catholic Church position.


9 posted on 12/17/2007 5:21:48 PM PST by Lucius Cornelius Sulla (Huckabee asks if Mormons believe Jesus, devil are brothers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Lucius Cornelius Sulla

The reality is that abortions to save the life of the mother almost always are in cases of ectopic pregnancies where the baby was NEVER going to be born alive.


10 posted on 12/17/2007 5:23:56 PM PST by wagglebee ("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

Media bias contributes to that perception, as well.


11 posted on 12/17/2007 5:52:25 PM PST by Clintonfatigued (You can't be serious about national security unless you're serious about border security)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Coleus; nickcarraway; narses; Mr. Silverback; Canticle_of_Deborah; TenthAmendmentChampion; ...

Please Freepmail me if you want on or off my Pro-Life Ping List.

12 posted on 12/17/2007 6:20:36 PM PST by cpforlife.org (A Catholic Respect Life Curriculum is available at KnightsForLife.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

Keep praying!


13 posted on 12/17/2007 6:31:03 PM PST by Salvation (†With God all things are possible.†)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee
Pray for an end to abortion and the conversion of America to a mindset of life!

14 posted on 12/17/2007 6:32:22 PM PST by Salvation (†With God all things are possible.†)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee
Pinged from Terri Dailies

8mm


15 posted on 12/18/2007 4:17:53 AM PST by 8mmMauser (Jezu ufam tobie...Jesus I trust in Thee)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: xtinct
pre 1970 there were hardly any breast cancer cases --> post Roe vs Wade --> hundreds of thousands of breast cancer cases

Outright lying about the facts does more to harm your cause than it does to help it. Breast cancer has indeed risen over time, but not nearly so dramatically as you claim. It's gone from 105 in 100,000 to 133 in 100,000 and back down to 124 in 100,000 our current rate. It's an out and out lie to say there was hardly any breast cancer pre-roe.

16 posted on 12/18/2007 2:41:57 PM PST by Melas (Offending stupid people since 1963)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Lucius Cornelius Sulla

Lucius Cornelius Sulla says, “Clearly they also support it if the life of the mother is severely endangered, which is the Catholic Church position.”

Lucius, you are mistaken. The Church supports abortion in no case. Here are some sections from the Cathechism:

2271 Since the first century the Church has affirmed the moral evil of every procured abortion. This teaching has not changed and remains unchangeable. Direct abortion, that is to say, abortion willed either as an end or a means, is gravely contrary to the moral law:

You shall not kill the embryo by abortion and shall not cause the newborn to perish.

God, the Lord of life, has entrusted to men the noble mission of safeguarding life, and men must carry it out in a manner worthy of themselves. Life must be protected with the utmost care from the moment of conception: abortion and infanticide are abominable crimes.

2272 Formal cooperation in an abortion constitutes a grave offense. The Church attaches the canonical penalty of excommunication to this crime against human life. “A person who procures a completed abortion incurs excommunication latae sententiae,” “by the very commission of the offense,” and subject to the conditions provided by Canon Law. The Church does not thereby intend to restrict the scope of mercy. Rather, she makes clear the gravity of the crime committed, the irreparable harm done to the innocent who is put to death, as well as to the parents and the whole of society.

2274 Since it must be treated from conception as a person, the embryo must be defended in its integrity, cared for, and healed, as far as possible, like any other human being.

Prenatal diagnosis is morally licit, “if it respects the life and integrity of the embryo and the human fetus and is directed toward its safe guarding or healing as an individual. . . . It is gravely opposed to the moral law when this is done with the thought of possibly inducing an abortion, depending upon the results: a diagnosis must not be the equivalent of a death sentence.”

2322 From its conception, the child has the right to life. Direct abortion, that is, abortion willed as an end or as a means, is a “criminal” practice (GS 27 § 3), gravely contrary to the moral law. The Church imposes the canonical penalty of excommunication for this crime against human life.


In short, Catholic moral theology says that a physcian or healthcare worker should try to presevre both mother and child. However, if the child dies due to some uncontrollable circumstance, we understand this as the principal of double effect, so the attending physcian/healthcare worker isn’t guilty of murder.


17 posted on 12/18/2007 3:49:11 PM PST by Quiet Man Jr.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Quiet Man Jr.

Oops, that’s principle of double effect ;-I


18 posted on 12/18/2007 4:56:09 PM PST by Quiet Man Jr.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Quiet Man Jr.
Oops, that’s principle of double effect

Which is, IMHO, the right of the mother to self defense, otherwise known as acting to save the life of the mother. Good to be in agreement.

19 posted on 12/18/2007 5:36:41 PM PST by Lucius Cornelius Sulla (Huckabee asks if Mormons believe Jesus, devil are brothers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: cpforlife.org

Thanks for the ping. By the way, I love the quote from Dr. Seuss “A Person’s a Person, no matter how small.”

.

.

.

According to Intrade, the winner of the December 12th GOP debate was... Duncan Hunter.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1938773/posts


20 posted on 12/19/2007 3:31:39 PM PST by Kevmo (We should withdraw from Iraq — via Tehran. And Duncan Hunter is just the man to get that job done.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson