Skip to comments.
New York Times Set To Nuke Hillary? (Tomorrow?)
Riehl World View ^
| 12/15/07
Posted on 12/15/2007 8:27:52 AM PST by LdSentinal
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 261-263 next last
To: LdSentinal
I don’t see this on Drudge and I looked a couple of times. Maybe he took it down?
41
posted on
12/15/2007 8:50:43 AM PST
by
Aria
(NO RAPIST ENABLER FOR PRESIDENT!!!)
To: LdSentinal
we sort of found that there are two HillarysOnly two? How many demonmd did Jesus cast out of that guy and put into a herd of pigs? Oh .... wait a moment ....
42
posted on
12/15/2007 8:51:16 AM PST
by
fella
(The proper application of the truth far more important than the knowledge of it's existance."Ike")
To: Redbob
I still think we're better off running against Hillary than against Hussein Obama - HE's the truly dangerous one! and he has a much better chance of appealing to "undecided" - i.e., easily swayed - voters. That is what the power broker Democrats have realised as well.
We conservatives are torn between that, and having such fun at seeing the Clintons hoisted on their own petard.
43
posted on
12/15/2007 8:52:13 AM PST
by
SkyPilot
To: LdSentinal
Perhaps she is still paying her secret police as well.
44
posted on
12/15/2007 8:52:46 AM PST
by
bert
(K.E. N.P. +12 . Moveon is not us...... Moveon is the enemy)
To: LdSentinal
This is the NYT attempt at lancing the boil before it infects further. The NYT knows that if the clinton machine savages O2 and scuttles his run, blacks will abandon democrats during the general election and sit aside and watch. Dems cannot win without monolithic, blind black support. If blacks witness the savagery of clintonian politics, they might reevaluate their supplicating to democrats and wonder what it was that earned democrats their blind obedience.
To: LdSentinal
I’m not seeing this on Drudge. Was it there? Did he take it down?
46
posted on
12/15/2007 8:53:29 AM PST
by
advance_copy
(Stand for life or nothing at all)
To: Aria
47
posted on
12/15/2007 8:53:31 AM PST
by
SkyPilot
To: LdSentinal
That only guarantees her poll numbers will go up.
48
posted on
12/15/2007 8:53:50 AM PST
by
dfwgator
(11+7+15=3 Heismans)
To: Diogenesis
LOVE it.
So snatching that one!
49
posted on
12/15/2007 8:54:01 AM PST
by
kimmie7
To: SkyPilot
To: LdSentinal
Bet the Clinton Chinese Mafia War Room is working 24/7 on this. Wouldn’t want to be the next plane this scribe is on.
Pray for W and Our Victorious Troops
51
posted on
12/15/2007 8:55:52 AM PST
by
bray
(Let's Bring Christ Back to Christmas)
To: mewzilla
The Bill Clinton “Libary” is the greatest money laundering operation in history. Remember the movie “The Producers” where Zero Mostel and Gene Wilder con old ladies into investing in their flop Broadway show? They sell well over 100% interest in the show, knowing that it will be a flop. Bill Clinton is doing the same thing, except that it is his soul that is involved. When his “investors” eventually come for his soul, they will find that there is nothing there.
52
posted on
12/15/2007 8:56:58 AM PST
by
fhayek
To: advance_copy
The Clintonites have no doubt seen this Drudge teaser.
People leak things to Drudge because they know he has MILLIONS of hits on his site.
As much as the old media despises him (not a "real" journalist dontchaknow) - they know the power he has.
Right now - Hillary's flying monkeys and her lesbian sex-slave Muslim intern Huma are going ape $#^*.
53
posted on
12/15/2007 8:57:06 AM PST
by
SkyPilot
To: mtbopfuyn
I am very concerned about the Breck Girl and Fat Bill. I have heard BG’s name more in the press in the last 48 hours than the last two months.
54
posted on
12/15/2007 8:57:38 AM PST
by
mad_as_he$$
("Has there been a code nine? Have you heard from the Doctor?")
To: Jeff Chandler
Well, that means that we would not longer have to worry about a dangerous Stalinist,(Mrs. Clinton), and would have to start worrying about an incompetent liberal, (Ubama). Or a ambulance chaser.
55
posted on
12/15/2007 8:57:48 AM PST
by
pepperhead
(Kennedy's float, Mary Jo's don't!)
To: MNJohnnie
after she is nominated they can claim that is old newsI don't think so. From the beginning everyone has known that Hillary's most fearsome opponent is Hillary, and her negatives will never go away. Therefore, she will always be a high risk candidate in danger of a dramatic melt-down at any stage in the next 8 years.
Consequently it is best to get her out now.
The rest of us can relax more with her gone. Without her, the political market will be better able to balance and weigh the actual qualifications of the remaining candidates who present themselves for office.
To: LdSentinal
If any of these media or political figures do intend to try to take down Hillary, they better have enough of an arsenal to make sure they do the job completely.
Otherwise, if they only wound her, and she does happen to win, they will have hell-ery to pay.
57
posted on
12/15/2007 8:58:21 AM PST
by
TomGuy
To: advance_copy
Im not seeing this on Drudge. Was it there? Did he take it down?Watch your back, Drudge. I wouldn't take any planes, trains or automobiles for awhile if i were you.
To: REDWOOD99
http://bigheaddc.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/09/huma_hillary.JPG You're right! It was just there 30 seconds ago too!
Something is going on!
Can you imagine the panic in the Clinton camp? The NY Slimes is getting leaned on BIG TIME by the Clintons right now.
59
posted on
12/15/2007 8:59:40 AM PST
by
SkyPilot
To: abb
I will be standing next to you. The other grave that I will piss on is Jane Fonda’s. You are invited to that party also if you desire.
60
posted on
12/15/2007 9:00:00 AM PST
by
mad_as_he$$
("Has there been a code nine? Have you heard from the Doctor?")
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 261-263 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson