You make bizarre, unfounded assumptions.
For one thing, it's not *my* contention that Fishes are intermediate to humans. Fishes (of whatever Age suits your fancy) are intermediaries to mammals/humans on Evolutionary Theory tree of life's, not mine.
For another thing, it hurts the Evolutionist argument, not mine, if there is no genetic path from coral to humans (e.g. via Fishes or any other species) because lack of a genetic path means code skipping...
And genetic code skipping is a death-blow to Evolutionary Theory.
(that being said, I dig your "Skippy" graphic!)
Oh, please. You stumble onto the scene babbling about something you call "code skipping" -- a claim so utterly devoid of support that, except for yourself, it has no adherents in mainstream science, Intelligent Design or creationism -- and proceed to post black knight graphics as your primary line of argument.
There is a reason, of course, why your crank theory is ignored by people who might otherwise be on your side. That reason is that even creationists have the capacity to be embarrassed. They would not like to find themselves on a witness stand, under oath, asserting that mainstream science says modern fish are ancestors to humans.