Oh, please. You stumble onto the scene babbling about something you call "code skipping" -- a claim so utterly devoid of support that, except for yourself, it has no adherents in mainstream science, Intelligent Design or creationism -- and proceed to post black knight graphics as your primary line of argument.
There is a reason, of course, why your crank theory is ignored by people who might otherwise be on your side. That reason is that even creationists have the capacity to be embarrassed. They would not like to find themselves on a witness stand, under oath, asserting that mainstream science says modern fish are ancestors to humans.
Nope. It's not "babbling" to cite DNA evidence. You should try it.
Instead, you simply raise the flag of surrender by showing that you can only insult.
The Monty Python graphics are *not* my primary line of argument, but rather, are used to show that you don't know when you've been beaten, much like that Black Knight.
You repeat ad nausium the same "modern Fish" nonsense, not even realizing that you are making an even weaker case for the very Evolutionary Theory that you would beg to defend.
Sad.
Evolutionary Theory falls flat if there is no evolutionary path for the immune trait in coral to evolve into humans, for instance, yet you trumpet the lack of a link as if it *supported* Evolution!
Talk about backwards thinking!