Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Democrats punish Michigan for early primary (strip state of delegates)
MSNBC ^ | 12/1/07

Posted on 12/01/2007 8:40:09 AM PST by Kimmers

VIENNA, Va. - Democratic leaders voted Saturday to strip Michigan of all its delegates to the national convention next year as punishment for scheduling an early presidential primary in violation of party rules.

Michigan, with 156 delegates, has scheduled a Jan. 15 primary. Democratic Party rules prohibit states other than Iowa, New Hampshire, Nevada and South Carolina from holding nominating contests before Feb. 5.

Florida was hit with a similar penalty in August for scheduling a Jan. 29 primary.

Michigan officials anticipated the action by the Democratic National Committee's rules panel. But Michigan Democratic Chairman Mark Brewer said before the vote that he didn't think the delegates would be lost for good. He expects the Democratic presidential nominee will insist the state's delegates be seated at the convention.

(Excerpt) Read more at msnbc.msn.com ...


TOPICS: Breaking News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: Michigan
KEYWORDS: dems; election; mi2008; moonbats; socialistparty
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-92 next last
To: upchuck

A stupid decision. Everyone who was running for delegate will cut back their work for the dim party in ‘08, the party leadership in Michigan looks weakened and will be angry at their party for this insult, and the candidates will have spent less money, time, and goodwill in the state.
Even native son Mikey Moore will have a hard time holding his head up after this.

Just like the city of Detroit does, the national dims have shot Michigan in the foot.


61 posted on 12/01/2007 4:36:05 PM PST by BlueStateBlues (Blue State for business, Red State at heart..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: Doe Eyes

Half the thread has posted since your reply and still everyone is beating up on the democrats when the republicans have said they are going to remove delegates from New Hampshire, Florida, South Carolina, Michigan and Wyoming during the republican National Convention this year.

New Hampshire, Florida, South Carolina, Michigan and Wyoming.

GOP Punishes Five Early Voting States: http://tinyurl.com/2j7suv


62 posted on 12/01/2007 5:14:15 PM PST by Rb ver. 2.0 (Global warming is the new Marxism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: do the dhue

now that would get some attention. but i like it


63 posted on 12/01/2007 5:55:46 PM PST by molette67
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: Kimmers
Democrats: count every vote WE deem fit to count.
64 posted on 12/01/2007 6:19:06 PM PST by Recovering_Democrat ((I am SO glad to no longer be associated with the party of Dependence on Government!))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #65 Removed by Moderator

To: Kimmers

The Democrat leadership are going to find themselves with no one to lead. This will not play well for them. If I were a Democrat candidate I’d use this to my advantage and demand the delegates be accepted. I thought this was the party of count every vote? ;-)


66 posted on 12/01/2007 8:24:18 PM PST by Maelstorm (Stupidty disguised as feelings is not an excuse for bad behavior.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TheBattman
I like it - alienate your voters.

Hey, it's worked so well for the GOP...

67 posted on 12/01/2007 8:46:37 PM PST by Old Sarge (This tagline in memory of FReeper 68-69TonkinGulfYachtClub)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: All; Kimmers
What happened to "count every vote" from these people? This is a fine example of "Democracy in action" (/sarcasm).

They were afraid of FoxNews hosting a debate. Now they're afraid of an electorate!

68 posted on 12/01/2007 9:57:09 PM PST by newzjunkey (“Market forces” demanded serfs and market forces got them. - Kolokotronis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kimmers

Guaranteed to tick off voters, and also profoundly anti-democratic. Why is either party investing themselves in kissing Iowa and New Hampshire’s butts? Where is it in the Constitution that they get to go first?


69 posted on 12/01/2007 11:40:34 PM PST by Mr. Silverback (Support Scouting: Raising boys to be strong men and politically incorrect at the same time.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kimmers
I can hear Dean’s demonic scream as he makes the declaration. Thank you dNc!
70 posted on 12/02/2007 4:17:24 AM PST by Road Warrior ‘04 (Officially Fredbacker1 but don't know how to change my name)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TheBattman

Does this help or hurt Hillary or is it a wash?


71 posted on 12/02/2007 4:30:02 AM PST by qman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance

What really bothers me is, why are we pushing these primaries up all the time. It is said so that certain states can have more influence. If that is so before long the primaries will be held before the president swears the oath of office.

I do not believe that the states should be mandated by the parties but shouldn’t the governors conference get together and work out a plan where each state could have and equitable say in there states primary, and move the primary season back to march at least.

With the advent of modern media it seems to me getting your views out to the public after the primaries should not be that complicated, and shouldn’t take eight months.

Also pet peve alert ‘How about a real convention for a change and not a corination, didn’t things used to be decided at conventions.’

I stopped watching conventions after Bush 41’s.

Sorry one more pre peve ‘How about a state of the union address that adressed the state of the union and not a laundry list of handout’s’.


72 posted on 12/02/2007 4:44:17 AM PST by qman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: qman

The whole thing is a power play. One that conservatives and conservatism are NOT going to benefit from.


73 posted on 12/02/2007 6:33:34 AM PST by EternalVigilance (Huckabee, Thompson, Paul, McCain, Giuliani, Romney: "Pro-Choice" for states...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: grellis

Michigan is at war with both parties’ establishments.


74 posted on 12/02/2007 2:40:59 PM PST by Clintonfatigued (You can't be serious about national security unless you're serious about border security)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kimmers
Well then that means the Dems will be disorganized for the 2008 election. Maybe the Republican party can make some Congressional advances in Michigan. The so called Democratic party is not so democratic. They want the sequence of primaries to favor Hilldabeast.
75 posted on 12/02/2007 8:16:06 PM PST by Candor7 (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Baghdad_(1258))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GOPJ

“I think they’re trying to knock out Obama...Dems rule with an iron fist - same thing to Florida.”

But that doesn’t make sense. Hillary is ahead - solidly - in both states. If this move hurts anyone it’s her.


76 posted on 12/02/2007 11:01:12 PM PST by COgamer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: COgamer

How do you feel about Hillary? You seem up on some things - but very negative on most Republicans. Can you give me some insights on where you’re coming from...


77 posted on 12/03/2007 5:13:42 AM PST by GOPJ ("Imagine the Outrage if FOX had Fixed a “debate” like this??" Freeper bray -- "CNN Sucks" - GOPJ)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: Springman; sergeantdave; cyclotic; netmilsmom; RatsDawg; PGalt; FreedomHammer; queenkathy; ...
Photo Sharing and Video Hosting at Photobucket

If you would like to be added or dropped from the Michigan ping list, please freepmail me.

SOMEONE HELP ME OUT HERE!

Last I heard, the legislation which set the early primary date was being contested in the courts. Part of the legislation gives the state dems and pubs exclusive access to the voter rolls in the upcoming primary.

Obviously, this would be shot down if it ever reached the federal level, as it is in direct violation of FOIA. My question to y'all is: Where is this legislation in the state courts?

I've said it before, I'll say it again: This was an incredibly stupid idea from the word go. Every Michigan voter should be royally PO'ed at both of our state parties.

78 posted on 12/03/2007 6:10:56 AM PST by grellis (Is this the best we've got??!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: AdmSmith; Berosus; Convert from ECUSA; dervish; Ernest_at_the_Beach; Fred Nerks; KlueLass; ...
Michigan, with 156 delegates, has scheduled a Jan. 15 primary. Democratic Party rules prohibit states other than Iowa, New Hampshire, Nevada and South Carolina from holding nominating contests before Feb. 5. Florida was hit with a similar penalty in August for scheduling a Jan. 29 primary.
Okay, Al Gore, get that army of lawyers you used in Florida back in 2000 on this disenfranchisement case.
79 posted on 12/03/2007 9:24:57 AM PST by SunkenCiv (Profile updated Friday, November 30, 2007____________________https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kimmers
http://www.usatoday.com/news/politics/2007-10-22-596553638_x.htm

http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2007/11/09/opinion/main3481138.shtml?source=RSSattr=Opinion_3481138
The Republican National Committee, which does not grant waivers to early states, will cut the delegate votes of New Hampshire, South Carolina, Wyoming, Michigan, and Florida in half.

Seems to me the RNC is doing the same thing?
80 posted on 12/03/2007 1:19:03 PM PST by mosquitobite (The penalty for refusing to participate in politics is you end up being governed by your inferiors)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-92 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson