Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Interest in Outdoor Wood Boilers Grows (Nanny State Wants More Control)
Yahoooooo! ^ | November 22, 2007 | Stephanie Reitz

Posted on 11/23/2007 6:18:58 AM PST by Diana in Wisconsin

Rob and Lynne Wallace jumped at the chance to install an outdoor wood boiler two years ago to heat their home and water supply.

For a year, they were immune to fluctuating fuel oil prices. Their family-owned tree service provided more than enough wood, stacked under a canopy near the furnace about 50 paces from their back patio.

But earlier this year, their small western Massachusetts town set limits on the outdoor boilers that forced the Wallaces to shut theirs down.

Concerned about air quality and neighborhood disputes, Hampden joined a growing number of communities nationwide setting their own rules on the increasingly popular wood boilers, which are not federally regulated. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency recommends emissions and air quality standards, but does not regulate where and when the wood-fired burners can be installed or used.

Rules are patchy on the state level, too.

Some states, including Connecticut and Maine, have regulations and let their municipalities adopt even stricter limits or ban the boilers altogether. Massachusetts has considered statewide rules but has not enacted them, while Michigan offers a model ordinance that local governments can adopt in the absence of statewide standards.

The Northeast States for Coordinated Air Use Management, a government coalition, estimates more than 155,000 wood boilers have been sold since 1990 in the Northeast, upper Midwest states and other areas prone to cold winters.

For those with easy access to wood, the boilers could make their homes among the few that are not vulnerable to swings in fuel oil and natural gas prices.

A recent Energy Department report says the cost of natural gas, used by 58 percent of American households, could rise 10 percent this winter. Heating oil, used by 7 percent of the country's homes, could jump 22 percent. Those who use electricity and propane will also see increases, with the prices of those sources estimated to rise 4 percent and 16 percent, respectively, this winter.

The Wallaces and others say wood boilers are an economical heat source that uses a renewable resource rather than dwindling foreign fuels.

"We're not hillbillies or trashy people. We're educated people who did our homework before we made our purchase, and we made it a point to operate it very conscientiously," said Lynne Wallace, whose unit would comply with the new town rules only if they spend thousands to move it elsewhere on their land.

The boilers resemble small sheds and burn wood to heat water, which is piped underground to the nearby home or other structure to provide heat and hot water. Some owners also use them for hot tubs, greenhouses and businesses such as dairy barns.

Depending on their size, their purchase price can range from about $5,000 to $15,000. That does not include pouring the foundation on which they sit, installing underground piping, extending the unit's smoke stack to exceed the height of any nearby roof, and other costs.

Their proliferation has prompted disputes over where they can be operated, the amount and smell of smoke emitted and other neighborhood issues. Many of those conflicts are being played out in town meetings and the offices of selectmen, mayors and health boards.

"You don't realize what you're dealing with until you get this haze all around your house and your back yard," said Chris Anderson, who bought his home in East Longmeadow, Mass., last year before learning that his neighbor had one of the boilers.

That 13-square-mile town, surrounded on all sides by communities with limits on the units, is considering its own rules. Emotions have been running high, however, about whether the limits should include existing units — as in neighboring Hampden — or apply only to newly installed boilers.

"My wife and I saved up for our dream house and this is the biggest investment of my life, and we can't enjoy it," Anderson said. "I'm not saying they should be banned everywhere, if they're put up in a good place away from other houses, but why should we be smoked out?"

Advocates of the boilers say irresponsible users — those who burn trash, chemically treated wood and other unacceptable substances — are ruining it for others who stick to the clean, seasoned wood recommended by manufacturers.

"We beg our customers to extend their chimneys higher up so the smoke disperses where their neighbors aren't affected, and we beg our customers to burn only the right wood," said Scott Bradley, owner of Mainline Heating & Supply of Ashford, Conn.

"We tell them you have the right to use a wood burner and stop using foreign oil, but you never have the right to smoke out your neighbor," he said.

In an attempt to avert such problems, Connecticut requires the boilers to be at least 200 feet from the nearest home not served by the unit, and also mandates chimney heights and the quality of the wood to be burned.

But those rules apply only to burners installed after July 2005, and towns can set stricter regulations or refuse to "grandfather in" older units if they wish. Some communities have banned the outdoor boilers altogether, including several in western Massachusetts and the eastern Connecticut towns of Hebron and Tolland.

Robert Girard, assistant director of the Connecticut Department of Environmental Protection's air enforcement division, said the department urges potential buyers to research whether their site is suitable before they make the purchase.

"Sometimes they're just not put in the right place because of the topography, the closeness of neighbors, things like that," he said. "There have been a number of cases where people have had to remove the units after they've spent a lot of money to put them in."

The Wallace family, which has returned to oil heat for their Hampden home, is still pondering what to do about the wood-fired boiler that sits cold and empty outside their house.

"It would have paid for itself in a few years," Lynne Wallace said, peering into the unit's firebox on a chilly recent morning. "And here it sits, off."


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Government
KEYWORDS: energy
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-92 next last
To: Melinda in TN
with the wood burning stove, once when I burned wood that poison ivy had been growing on and once when I burned some Black Walnut.

I can imagine you got something close to a chemical weapon when you burned the posion ivy. What happened when you burned black walnut?

41 posted on 11/23/2007 7:38:58 AM PST by Centurion2000 (False modesty is as great a sin as false pride.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Diana in Wisconsin; All

What happened to the catalytic combustors that used to be advertised for wood stoves?

Did they go by the boards?

Oh, and BTW, remember when hurricane Hugo hit and crossed S. Carolina and Western N. Carolina?
Authorities claimed there was enough downed trees to keep the pulp and lumber industry in raw material for 2 yrs.
Of course, environmentalists sqashed the gathering of most of it.

Just to point out the availability of a wasted resource.


42 posted on 11/23/2007 7:39:08 AM PST by Vinnie (You're Nobody 'Til Somebody Jihads You)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #43 Removed by Moderator

To: Centurion2000

“Then stop driving your car if you have the courage of your convictions.”

That comparison would make sense if cars spewed volumes of noxious smoke full of the nasty results of incomplete combustion of organic materials. Thanks to the EPA (!), however, about the most noxious thing coming out of most cars’ tailpipes is some carbon monoxide, which dissipates in short order.


44 posted on 11/23/2007 7:40:54 AM PST by -YYZ- (Strong like bull, smart like ox.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Centurion2000

Some walnut occasionally gets mixed into my stack of wood. I don’t notice anything vs. the oak and ash I usually burn...


45 posted on 11/23/2007 7:41:31 AM PST by Eric in the Ozarks (Go Hawks !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Centurion2000

My car (cars, pickup, outboard motor) all run clean.


46 posted on 11/23/2007 7:42:22 AM PST by Eric in the Ozarks (Go Hawks !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Lonesome in Massachussets

I use a Catalytic wood stove. Once warmed up, the thing just does not put out any smoke, in fact, you can’t even smell smoke.

Propane is more than $1.90, I’m burning wood to save money but I collect about 5 cords of limbs and dead trees every year from my property. It’s virtually free and mother nature drops another supply for me every year.


47 posted on 11/23/2007 7:42:43 AM PST by dangerdoc (dangerdoc (not actually dangerous any more))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: WackySam

Tampa? Chilly nights? Don’t make me laugh. It was 13 degrees when I got up this morning...how about you?

Wood burning stoves stick. The best way to heat your home with one is to damp the fire way down so the wood doesn’t burn too quickly. That makes it smolder....thick smoke.

Just a Freeper from Wisconsin.


48 posted on 11/23/2007 7:45:24 AM PST by PjhCPA (Who will be the next Ronald Reagan? We'd better find him. SOON!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Lonesome in Massachussets
Wood is one of the dirtiest forms of heating and one of the worst for the environment. Some years ago, even Andy Rooney noticed that if everyone used wood heat, soon Vermont would look like Saudi Arabia.

Are you old enough to remember when 2 out of 3 house ha a coal furnace? Now those were smokey winter days!

The libertarian in me repels at regulation, but imagining that wood heat is environmentally friendly is self-delusion of the worst kind.

I am much more OK with local regs federal mandates. Seems like a 20' tall chimney would solve most of the problems.

49 posted on 11/23/2007 7:47:39 AM PST by Ghengis (Of course freedom is free. If it wasn't, it would be called expensivedom. ~Cindy Sheehan 11/11/06)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Eric in the Ozarks
My car (cars, pickup, outboard motor) all run clean.

Like hell they do. You generate carbon monoxide which is a hell of a lot worse than plain woodsmoke. My only beef with wood boilers is don't burn pressure treated wood. That's a no-no because it generates really nasty gasses.

50 posted on 11/23/2007 7:48:05 AM PST by Centurion2000 (False modesty is as great a sin as false pride.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: Rb ver. 2.0; stainlessbanner
BBQ grills are next.

Over my dead body.

51 posted on 11/23/2007 7:49:01 AM PST by Constitution Day (Everything was fine until membership lost its privileges)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Diana in Wisconsin
"...Michigan offers a model ordinance that local governments can adopt in the absence of statewide standards."

I'll just bet they do...

52 posted on 11/23/2007 7:50:29 AM PST by Redbob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Centurion2000

I’ll take your advice on pressure treated wood.


53 posted on 11/23/2007 7:51:55 AM PST by Eric in the Ozarks (Go Hawks !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: Tax-chick
Does boiled wood taste as awful as boiled peanuts?

I don't know, but probably isn't as good for you.

54 posted on 11/23/2007 7:52:57 AM PST by sionnsar (trad-anglican.faithweb.com |Iran Azadi| 5yst3m 0wn3d - it's N0t Y0ur5 (SONY) | UN: Useless Nations)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Diana in Wisconsin
“My wife and I saved up for our dream house and this is the biggest investment of my life, and we can’t enjoy it,” Anderson said. “I’m not saying they should be banned everywhere, if they’re put up in a good place away from other houses, but why should we be smoked out?”

Because YOU are a moron Anderson. You should have checked out the regulations and your future neighbors BEFORE you bought your house. Stupid people like you should never be allowed to make the rules for everyone because you are too damn STUPID!!!!

55 posted on 11/23/2007 7:54:35 AM PST by monday
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lonesome in Massachussets
Meant to say:
I am much more OK with local regs than with federal mandates.
56 posted on 11/23/2007 7:54:56 AM PST by Ghengis (Of course freedom is free. If it wasn't, it would be called expensivedom. ~Cindy Sheehan 11/11/06)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: Centurion2000

The Black Walnut caused some severe allergic reactions like headache, sore throat and nausea. It didn’t bother my asthma but the headache was awful. It didn’t make my husband as sick as it did me but he definitely noticed that something was wrong. I finally figured it out and tossed the BW out of the wood pile. As soon as I went back to oak and hickory the headache and other problems went away. BW is not your usual firewood. The only reason we had any was because we cut a BW tree out of the yard and I didn’t want to waste the wood.

The poison ivy caused small itchy bumps to start sprouting all over my body. It took a while to figure that one out. It was like having Chicken Pox or Measles. They didn’t spread like a rash but were more like a really bad mosquito bite and itched like the devil.

The wood stove doesn’t allow much smoke to escape into the room and it’s a good thing. The reactions I had with just a small amount of smoke from the BW was bad. We don’t get smoke in the house at all as long as I open the damper and let it start burning good before the door to the stove is opened. Keeping the chimney cleaned is a must. We take it down every Spring and clean it before storing it in the shed for the summer.


57 posted on 11/23/2007 7:55:24 AM PST by Melinda in TN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: sionnsar

I love boiled peanuts and never knew that. Thanks!


58 posted on 11/23/2007 7:55:52 AM PST by Constitution Day (Everything was fine until membership lost its privileges)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: monday

Whenever I want cogent analysis of the world of real estate, I turn to...


59 posted on 11/23/2007 7:59:02 AM PST by Eric in the Ozarks (Go Hawks !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: grasshopper2
“And forget about using the backyard. I asked her to raise the stack but she refuses. (She told me to get air filters) I want my town to pass an ordinance requiring stacks to be above the roofs and make it retroactive.”

I expect your town already has rules regarding this. Smoke stacks generally haver to be a certain hight. they also have zoning regulations that in all probability don’t allow her to operate a small business in your residential neighborhood. Go down to city hall and talk to the planning and zoning dept.

60 posted on 11/23/2007 8:00:50 AM PST by monday
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-92 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson