Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

If I were one of the opponents that they endorse, I'd be running ads and campaigning at college campuses about this. Personally, I think it'll be Hillary, considering that her disgrace of a husband signed the DMCA, and considering how Glickman was a member of his cabinet.
1 posted on 11/20/2007 4:33:55 PM PST by abt87
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: abt87

Republicans can make great inroads with younger folks by being on the right side of this. Dunno if they’re smart enough (any of them) to do that though.

The entertainment industry needs to grow up. They need to embrace new technology, not shun it and attempt to pigeonhole everything into some dead paradigm. Somewhere along the way they forgot that if your business doesn’t change with the times, it withers and dies. It’s true for any business.


2 posted on 11/20/2007 4:37:36 PM PST by perfect_rovian_storm (John Cox 2008: Because Duncan Hunter just isn't obscure enough for me!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: abt87

Oh sure, be a brave presidential candidate and come out in favor of “big business” and be all for suing grandma’s and mom’s and dad’s for what their kids download.

Real smart.....

Nope. Won’t happen.

But they will once in office support these sue happy clowns.


3 posted on 11/20/2007 5:04:11 PM PST by RiVer19
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: abt87

I’m all for reasonable exclusive rights to created content, protected by the courts, in exchange for that content becoming the public domain after a short number of years.

The present legalistic scenario is the author’s lifetime plus seventy years.

Make it fifteen years; long enough to make a profit off the original work, short enough to actually make it an exchange. Either that, or simply disband the copyright office if no one is willing to make this exchange as conceptualized by the founding fathers.


4 posted on 11/20/2007 5:10:25 PM PST by kingu (No, I don't use sarcasm tags - it confuses people.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: abt87

Both the RIAA and MPAA need to be subject to antitrust proceedings.


5 posted on 11/20/2007 5:11:50 PM PST by mysterio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: abt87

this makes me sick.


6 posted on 11/20/2007 5:40:47 PM PST by wildwood
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: abt87
RIAA, MPAA urge pro-copyright vows from presidential candidates

Talk about a scary cult running the country...

7 posted on 11/20/2007 5:47:06 PM PST by Duke Nukum (He burns at the center of time and he sees the turn of the Universe.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: abt87

My campaign plank would be that the RIAA and the MPAA should die a horrible death and that every lawyer and executive working for them would be sent to Guantanamo, never to be seen again.


10 posted on 11/20/2007 6:36:53 PM PST by BlazingArizona
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: abt87

A candidate looking to lock up some extra votes should respond with a polite variation on “Kiss My @$$” (or, better yet, simply with “Kiss My @$$”).


11 posted on 11/29/2007 6:37:52 AM PST by steve-b (Sin lies only in hurting others unnecessarily. All other "sins" are invented nonsense. --RAH)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: abt87

Still Thinking urges the RIAA and MPAA to bite his fat hiary white azz.


13 posted on 12/12/2007 10:42:55 AM PST by Still Thinking (Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: abt87

LOL, like protecting the music industry is of national interest.


15 posted on 12/12/2007 10:46:17 AM PST by ßuddaßudd (7 days - 7 ways Guero >>> with a floating, shifting, ever changing persona....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: abt87

I would probably no vote for any candidate that signed on to help the RIAA go after music fans.


18 posted on 12/12/2007 10:49:57 AM PST by mysterio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: abt87
I think it'll be Hillary, considering that her disgrace of a husband signed the DMCA

Wasn't much of a President, either.

19 posted on 12/12/2007 10:57:14 AM PST by Still Thinking (Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson