Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: abt87

I’m all for reasonable exclusive rights to created content, protected by the courts, in exchange for that content becoming the public domain after a short number of years.

The present legalistic scenario is the author’s lifetime plus seventy years.

Make it fifteen years; long enough to make a profit off the original work, short enough to actually make it an exchange. Either that, or simply disband the copyright office if no one is willing to make this exchange as conceptualized by the founding fathers.


4 posted on 11/20/2007 5:10:25 PM PST by kingu (No, I don't use sarcasm tags - it confuses people.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: kingu
"The present legalistic scenario is the author’s lifetime plus seventy years."

Emphasis on "present". Big Media gets congress to extend this routinely whenever some of the big properties are about to expire. The Supreme Court has basicly ruled that the contitiutional protection of "limited copyrights" means any time frame that isn't perpetual. Much better gig than patents.

8 posted on 11/20/2007 6:00:59 PM PST by joebuck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson