Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 11/15/2007 8:19:21 PM PST by Lorianne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Lorianne

Funny, it looks just like all the college buildings I attended in the 70's.

If the preservationists like the style so much, I'm sure there are plenty of other places they can go stare at.

2 posted on 11/15/2007 8:27:22 PM PST by I still care ("Remember... for it is the doom of men that they forget" - Merlin, from Excalibur)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Lorianne

BRUTALIST ARCHITECTURE ... what puff, nonsense & ugliness!


3 posted on 11/15/2007 8:27:36 PM PST by dodger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Lorianne

I really, really hate these Internation Style buildings.

4 posted on 11/15/2007 8:28:29 PM PST by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Lorianne

Looks like nothing so much as a military bunker. Needs artillery—incoming.


6 posted on 11/15/2007 8:31:41 PM PST by Hebrews 11:6 (Do you REALLY believe that (1) God is, and (2) God is good?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Lorianne

Title had me thinking this was an article about hillary


11 posted on 11/15/2007 8:40:40 PM PST by fso301
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Lorianne; aculeus; Billthedrill; AnAmericanMother
A Chicago landmark, which some might call Church of Christ, Woofer.
12 posted on 11/15/2007 8:45:10 PM PST by dighton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Lorianne

Is it insured? (Hint, hint).


15 posted on 11/15/2007 9:01:35 PM PST by Socratic (“Worry does not empty tomorrow of its sorrow; it empties today of its strength.” - Corrie Ten Boom)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Lorianne

More and more, people don’t have control over their property. Kelo says that the government can take it away from you and sell to private firms, and in this case, a quasi-governmental group tells a church that they can’t get rid of a building that they can no longer afford. That’s just not right. If the preservationist group wants to keep the ugly building, then they should buy it at market value from the church IF the church wants to sell to them.


16 posted on 11/15/2007 9:04:08 PM PST by DeweyCA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Lorianne; Lijahsbubbe
Kirkpatrick said without significant changes, his congregation may not be able to stay in the neighborhood they've occupied for more than 100 years. The cumbersome heating system is falling apart, Grier said, and a new one could cost as much as the building itself. The concrete that has started falling off the building is also expensive to fix. The elevator doesn't work, and changing light bulbs alone costs between $4,000 and $8,000 to erect the necessary scaffolding.

Looks like Brutalism was designed to be a gift that kept on giving. Just hope the preservation perps don't try the environmental-impact-to-pigeons habitat angle.

19 posted on 11/15/2007 9:39:48 PM PST by Thinkin' Gal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Lorianne
Berk said the church meets the landmark designation criteria in that it was created by a master craftsman --architect Araldo Cossutta worked with Pei's firm -- and exemplifies distinguishing characteristics of architecture.

From the looks of that building, Cossutta studied at the B. U. (BUTT UGLY) School of Architecture.

20 posted on 11/15/2007 9:42:21 PM PST by SuziQ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Lorianne
Neighborhood preservationists, meanwhile, see a living testament to the type of 1970s architectural ``brutalism'' championed by I.M. Pei and others. It's so distinct, they say, that it should be passed on to future generations.

Fine. If this bunch likes it so much, then they can cough up some cash and buy the church out.

22 posted on 11/15/2007 9:48:22 PM PST by uglybiker (relaxing in a luxuriant cloud of quality, aromatic, pre-owned tobacco essence)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Lorianne
My answer: just plain ugly.

If there is a "Soviet school of architecture", this one fits.

It's about as appealing as Her Heinous' rear end! :)

- John

23 posted on 11/15/2007 9:51:43 PM PST by Fishrrman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Lorianne

Sonoma State University (local to us here in Northern Cal) has several buildings in the “brutalism” style, and they are the ugliest damn things you’ve ever seen. They look like Soviet prisons. The only thing that makes the campus attractive is the very nice landscaping and the new Charlies Schultz library, which is quite nice. But those brutalist buildings ... ugh!


27 posted on 11/15/2007 10:52:31 PM PST by Hetty_Fauxvert
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Lorianne
Here, just a little touchup:
Image Hosted by ImageShack.us
29 posted on 11/16/2007 1:28:11 AM PST by mkjessup
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Lorianne

Reminds me of a large version of a Japanese bunker on Iwo Jima. Give it to the Marines.


31 posted on 11/16/2007 5:36:47 AM PST by sergeantdave (The majority of Michigan voters are that stupid and the condition is incipient and growing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson