Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Ron Paul supported the PLO terrorists
The Ron Paul Political Report | Volume 1 Number 1 | Ron Paul

Posted on 11/09/2007 12:34:47 PM PST by LSUfan

The Ron Paul Political Report

Volume I Number 1

Page 6

GOLD EAGLES AND LEAD BALLOONS

Each month I will award Gold Eagles to champions of freedom and Lead Balloons to statists. Please send me your suggestions.

A LEAD BALLOON to Jack Kemp (R-NY) and Bob Dole (R-KS) who have introduced legislation to forcibly close the Palestinian Information Office in Washington. They would also ban delegates from the Palestinian Liberation Organization at the United Nations. The authors call this bill an "Anti-Terrorism Act." But what about terrorism that uses government force to suppress free expression in this country?


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Israel; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 911truth; lewrockwell; looser; paul; paulbearers; paulestinians; paulistinians; plo; ronpaul
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121 next last
To: fortheDeclaration

Sad, isn’t it?


41 posted on 11/09/2007 2:04:05 PM PST by Iwo Jima ("Close the border. Then we'll talk.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: fortheDeclaration
Looks like victory is closing in from everything I am hearing, maybe you should chat with Allegra...

As far as the rest of your drivel, nice try, but seems the only ones trying to run us out of Iraq are the Dems, MoveON, KOS, and oh yeah, the chief surrender monkey himself...

42 posted on 11/09/2007 2:04:29 PM PST by ejonesie22 (Real voters in real voting booths will elect FDT.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Dead Corpse

I have my differences with Ron Paul on the Iraq war, but this bullshit lying about the good things the man has done is shameful.


43 posted on 11/09/2007 2:06:05 PM PST by Iwo Jima ("Close the border. Then we'll talk.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: LSUfan
Hey, LSUfan, you cut-and-paste and run coward. Come back and post the ENTIRE article that you SAY that you are quoting. I don’t trust you for a New York minute to have posted the truth and in full context.
44 posted on 11/09/2007 2:08:14 PM PST by Iwo Jima ("Close the border. Then we'll talk.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Iwo Jima
Crime and politics. Lying about your opponent is nothing new.

What should be new is taking them to court over libel and slander. That's put the breaks on things pretty quick.

45 posted on 11/09/2007 2:10:07 PM PST by Dead Corpse (What would a free man do?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: fortheDeclaration
So, what would constitute a victory in Iraq that would allow us to withdraw our forces and have them march down the streets of New York in a great parade as they did when they won other wars?

Are you paying any attention at all to what is going on in Iraq right now? To what has been going on as well as what is NOT going on in Iraq for the past three or four months?

I know it pains you anti-war types deeply, but the troops are in the process of "ending the war," via VICTORY as opposed to the surrender plan the lefties want so badly.

46 posted on 11/09/2007 2:10:27 PM PST by Allegra (Greetings from a kinder, gentler Iraq. God bless US and Coalition Forces.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: ejonesie22
Looks like victory is closing in from everything I am hearing, maybe you should chat with Allegra...

You mean victory in Iraq?

So, we are going to pull out soon?

As far as the rest of your drivel, nice try, but seems the only ones trying to run us out of Iraq are the Dems, MoveON, KOS, and oh yeah, the chief surrender monkey himself...

We have been in Iraq for 5 years now and asking that we have a defined view of what constitutes a victory is considered being 'run out'.

It is nice to see those who consider them conservatives so willing to have a rational discussion regarding foreign policy.

47 posted on 11/09/2007 2:13:40 PM PST by fortheDeclaration (We must beat the Democrats or the country will be ruined! - Lincoln)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Iwo Jima

That is the entire article. The PLO was considered a terrorist organization at the time by the United States.

USMC 1982-87


48 posted on 11/09/2007 2:15:00 PM PST by LSUfan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: LSUfan

Oy vey, Ron Paul is a real lunatic.


49 posted on 11/09/2007 2:16:08 PM PST by MEGoody (Ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LSUfan

Wonder if Ron Perot nominated Saddamn for the Nobel??

Pray for W and Our Victorious Troops


50 posted on 11/09/2007 2:18:55 PM PST by bray (Think "Betray U.S." Think Democrat)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Allegra
[So, what would constitute a victory in Iraq that would allow us to withdraw our forces and have them march down the streets of New York in a great parade as they did when they won other wars?]

Are you paying any attention at all to what is going on in Iraq right now? To what has been going on as well as what is NOT going on in Iraq for the past three or four months? I know it pains you anti-war types deeply, but the troops are in the process of "ending the war," via VICTORY as opposed to the surrender plan the lefties want so badly.

So, they are going to get that victory parade!

They didn't get one after Korea or Vietnam and we won major military victories in those conflicts as well.

You know why they didn't get the parades they deserve, because no war had been declared.

So, you pro-war types, why don't you start a movement for Congress to actually do what they are suppose to do, and declare war so we as a nation will support it and win it-just like Ron Paul advocated.

I know very well about the 'surge' and how well it is doing, after political decisions prevented our troops from ending this war years ago (we didn't want to offend anyone).

So who are the 'real'conservatives, those who want a real definable victory or those who want to stay with the Democrats and just commit our troops to combat without any clear defined goal in what a victory would consist of.

51 posted on 11/09/2007 2:19:27 PM PST by fortheDeclaration (We must beat the Democrats or the country will be ruined! - Lincoln)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: fortheDeclaration
It is nice to see those who consider them conservatives so willing to have a rational discussion regarding foreign policy. I have seen what constitutes discussion with you guys, and conservative has nothing to do with it...
52 posted on 11/09/2007 2:19:53 PM PST by ejonesie22 (Real voters in real voting booths will elect FDT.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: Allegra

You left off Surrender monkeys after the word lefties...

Otherwise thanks for trying to school these cats...


53 posted on 11/09/2007 2:21:12 PM PST by ejonesie22 (Real voters in real voting booths will elect FDT.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: Deathmonger
So you believe that Reagan would have supported having PLO reps in the UN? Uh, no. But it certainly appears that Ron Paul did. (And probably still does - I've seen nothing indicating he's changed his mind.)

I also think Reagan would be in favor of closing the Palestinian Information Office in Washington. It is at worst a front for organizing terror. At best, I don't see it being anything but a front for stirring up anti-Israel sentiment.

54 posted on 11/09/2007 2:23:16 PM PST by MEGoody (Ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: fortheDeclaration

It’s odd that the Paulestinians have forgotten that Congress authorized the use of force in Iraq.


55 posted on 11/09/2007 2:25:17 PM PST by MEGoody (Ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: Allegra
Has the Commander in Chief defined what would constitute a victory in Iraq?
56 posted on 11/09/2007 2:25:46 PM PST by Abcdefg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: fortheDeclaration
So, you pro-war types, why don't you start a movement for Congress to actually do what they are suppose (sic!) to do, and declare war so we as a nation will support it and win it-just like Ron Paul advocated.

We "pro-war" types are busy with the war and with transition activities. We'll have to leave that other stuff to the Ron Paul-worshiping moonbats. We're not worried so much about parades; we're more concerned with the eradication of terror threats to the U.S.

I can see by the rest of your very CNN-isnpired remarks that you appear to be almost choking on those sour grapes you've ingested in the midst of the victory taking place in Iraq.

57 posted on 11/09/2007 2:27:02 PM PST by Allegra (Greetings from a kinder, gentler Iraq. God bless US and Coalition Forces.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: Abcdefg
Has the Commander in Chief defined what would constitute a victory in Iraq?

Why don't you ask him? You're closer in proximity than I am right now.

I knew you aPaulogists would get all surly and bitter when the Peace Train headed for Iraq. LOL

You're not alone. The Democrats and the media share your pain.

58 posted on 11/09/2007 2:29:24 PM PST by Allegra (Greetings from a kinder, gentler Iraq. God bless US and Coalition Forces.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: MEGoody

It is very important to point out that, if Ron Paul had his way in 1991, Saddam would still occupy Kuwait, international inspectors would never have uncovered his chemical, biological and nuclear programs and he would very likely have The Atomic Bomb today.


59 posted on 11/09/2007 2:32:47 PM PST by LSUfan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: Allegra
[So, you pro-war types, why don't you start a movement for Congress to actually do what they are suppose (sic!) to do, and declare war so we as a nation will support it and win it-just like Ron Paul advocated.]

We "pro-war" types are busy with the war and with transition activities. We'll have to leave that other stuff to the Ron Paul-worshiping moonbats. We're not worried so much about parades; we're more concerned with the eradication of terror threats to the U.S.

My, you must be very busy people-how do you have time to be in FR?

What transition is going on that will end the war with our troops marching home in victory.

Or is that a secret plan like Kerry had?

Maybe you aren't worried about parades, but the troops deserve them and that is why when we win a war, they get one.

I can see by the rest of your very CNN-isnpired remarks that you appear to be almost choking on those sour grapes you've ingested in the midst of the victory taking place in Iraq.

You mean the military gains that have occurred?

Will they be translated into political ones or squandered like they were in Korea and Vietnam?

60 posted on 11/09/2007 2:36:28 PM PST by fortheDeclaration (We must beat the Democrats or the country will be ruined! - Lincoln)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson