Posted on 11/09/2007 12:34:47 PM PST by LSUfan
Sad, isn’t it?
As far as the rest of your drivel, nice try, but seems the only ones trying to run us out of Iraq are the Dems, MoveON, KOS, and oh yeah, the chief surrender monkey himself...
I have my differences with Ron Paul on the Iraq war, but this bullshit lying about the good things the man has done is shameful.
What should be new is taking them to court over libel and slander. That's put the breaks on things pretty quick.
Are you paying any attention at all to what is going on in Iraq right now? To what has been going on as well as what is NOT going on in Iraq for the past three or four months?
I know it pains you anti-war types deeply, but the troops are in the process of "ending the war," via VICTORY as opposed to the surrender plan the lefties want so badly.
You mean victory in Iraq?
So, we are going to pull out soon?
As far as the rest of your drivel, nice try, but seems the only ones trying to run us out of Iraq are the Dems, MoveON, KOS, and oh yeah, the chief surrender monkey himself...
We have been in Iraq for 5 years now and asking that we have a defined view of what constitutes a victory is considered being 'run out'.
It is nice to see those who consider them conservatives so willing to have a rational discussion regarding foreign policy.
That is the entire article. The PLO was considered a terrorist organization at the time by the United States.
USMC 1982-87
Oy vey, Ron Paul is a real lunatic.
Wonder if Ron Perot nominated Saddamn for the Nobel??
Pray for W and Our Victorious Troops
Are you paying any attention at all to what is going on in Iraq right now? To what has been going on as well as what is NOT going on in Iraq for the past three or four months? I know it pains you anti-war types deeply, but the troops are in the process of "ending the war," via VICTORY as opposed to the surrender plan the lefties want so badly.
So, they are going to get that victory parade!
They didn't get one after Korea or Vietnam and we won major military victories in those conflicts as well.
You know why they didn't get the parades they deserve, because no war had been declared.
So, you pro-war types, why don't you start a movement for Congress to actually do what they are suppose to do, and declare war so we as a nation will support it and win it-just like Ron Paul advocated.
I know very well about the 'surge' and how well it is doing, after political decisions prevented our troops from ending this war years ago (we didn't want to offend anyone).
So who are the 'real'conservatives, those who want a real definable victory or those who want to stay with the Democrats and just commit our troops to combat without any clear defined goal in what a victory would consist of.
You left off Surrender monkeys after the word lefties...
Otherwise thanks for trying to school these cats...
I also think Reagan would be in favor of closing the Palestinian Information Office in Washington. It is at worst a front for organizing terror. At best, I don't see it being anything but a front for stirring up anti-Israel sentiment.
It’s odd that the Paulestinians have forgotten that Congress authorized the use of force in Iraq.
We "pro-war" types are busy with the war and with transition activities. We'll have to leave that other stuff to the Ron Paul-worshiping moonbats. We're not worried so much about parades; we're more concerned with the eradication of terror threats to the U.S.
I can see by the rest of your very CNN-isnpired remarks that you appear to be almost choking on those sour grapes you've ingested in the midst of the victory taking place in Iraq.
Why don't you ask him? You're closer in proximity than I am right now.
I knew you aPaulogists would get all surly and bitter when the Peace Train headed for Iraq. LOL
You're not alone. The Democrats and the media share your pain.
It is very important to point out that, if Ron Paul had his way in 1991, Saddam would still occupy Kuwait, international inspectors would never have uncovered his chemical, biological and nuclear programs and he would very likely have The Atomic Bomb today.
We "pro-war" types are busy with the war and with transition activities. We'll have to leave that other stuff to the Ron Paul-worshiping moonbats. We're not worried so much about parades; we're more concerned with the eradication of terror threats to the U.S.
My, you must be very busy people-how do you have time to be in FR?
What transition is going on that will end the war with our troops marching home in victory.
Or is that a secret plan like Kerry had?
Maybe you aren't worried about parades, but the troops deserve them and that is why when we win a war, they get one.
I can see by the rest of your very CNN-isnpired remarks that you appear to be almost choking on those sour grapes you've ingested in the midst of the victory taking place in Iraq.
You mean the military gains that have occurred?
Will they be translated into political ones or squandered like they were in Korea and Vietnam?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.