Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

In other words, not another Howard Dean disappointment. Please nominate this beast!
1 posted on 11/01/2007 5:09:26 AM PDT by 668 - Neighbor of the Beast
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: 668 - Neighbor of the Beast

we want hillary to be nominated? ummm not a good idea


2 posted on 11/01/2007 5:12:57 AM PDT by ari-freedom (I am for traditional moral values, a strong national defense, and free markets.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 668 - Neighbor of the Beast

Don’t worry. The Beast will be nominated. Even if the bodies of Obama and Edwards have to end up somewhere in a ditch. The Beast will be nominated. You can bet the farm on it.


3 posted on 11/01/2007 5:13:01 AM PDT by samtheman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 668 - Neighbor of the Beast

Democrats are going down like the Titanic and Hillary is the Iceberg that can’t be avoided.


4 posted on 11/01/2007 5:19:49 AM PDT by Berlin_Freeper (ETERNAL SHAME on the Treasonous and Immoral Democrats!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 668 - Neighbor of the Beast

How big a threat is she to pull the majority of the female vote - whether Democrat or Republican? My wife is convinced that a huge number of women will vote for her just because she is a woman. No, my wife won’t be one of those. After listening to a female caller yesterday on Rush I’m beginning to think she may be right. I still don’t think she can win but it could make it a close race.


5 posted on 11/01/2007 5:19:51 AM PDT by ladtx ( "Never miss a good chance to shut up." - - Will Rogers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 668 - Neighbor of the Beast
Nope. Let em draw blood. Let them slow bleed her. Let the flies come around and land on her puking bleeding body. The more crap THEY put out about their eventual candidate will only let the rest of stupid Amerika see what a total slut she is.
6 posted on 11/01/2007 5:22:41 AM PDT by RetiredArmy (The Marxist's Dimocrat Party: Party for and by terrorists, Marxists, Socialists and Homos.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 668 - Neighbor of the Beast
Give us the opportunity to give the Republican attack machine another shot at Hillary Clinton. Let her coast to victory in the primaries. Then we'll take it from there.

I understand what Michael is saying, but the words "Republican attack machine" are a pejorative term that have the effect of waving a red cape in front of Democrat "bulls"!! With the hypersensitivity of the MSM to ANY effort to hold Queen Hilly accountable for her actions and words, a Republican making reference to the "Republican attack machine" is merely the door opener on another round of much ado about nothing.

But, it would serve to distract the public from the disasterous Democrat-led Congress with the lowest approval ratings in history . . . . . . and they are continuing to slide!!!

9 posted on 11/01/2007 5:38:19 AM PDT by DustyMoment (FloriDUH - proud inventors of pregnant/hanging chads and judicide!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 668 - Neighbor of the Beast

If she gets te nomination, she will become President. Not that she will win the election, but she will not let that go without a very serious fight and who knows what kind of legal hijinx she will use to get her way. In other words, it doesn’t matter what the voters want, she will use whatever means she can to get her way. She believes she deserves the Presidency and that, above all else, makes her the worst candidate for the job.


10 posted on 11/01/2007 5:39:52 AM PDT by doc30 (Democrats are to morals what an Etch-A-Sketch is to Art.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 668 - Neighbor of the Beast

I want Hillary to be taken down. And if John Edwards or Barack Obama can take her down in the primaries, then more power to them. I don’t care if they are harder to beat in the general election. The sooner Hillary’s presidential hopes can be dashed, the better.


11 posted on 11/01/2007 5:40:43 AM PDT by John Cena
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 668 - Neighbor of the Beast
"Republican attack machine" HAHAHAHAHAHA! That's the big object that Republicans have been curling up in a ball behind.
12 posted on 11/01/2007 5:44:45 AM PDT by Nathan Zachary
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 668 - Neighbor of the Beast
Sorry. Hillary! is just to dangerous. As long as she is defeated, I don't care who does it. We shouldn't be fighting over who gets the glory.

Defeat Hillary As Soon As Possible.

13 posted on 11/01/2007 5:47:16 AM PDT by gridlock (ELIMINATE PERVERSE INCENTIVES)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 668 - Neighbor of the Beast
Sorry, but I'm still holding to the notion that the Dem nominee will be a White Guy From The South(tm).

Dems will talk a good game about the black and the lady and the Hispanic, but based on their history, it'll be WGFTS.

TS

15 posted on 11/01/2007 5:49:59 AM PDT by Tanniker Smith ("I got a rock." -- Charlie Brown. "I got Iraq." -- George W. Bush)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 668 - Neighbor of the Beast

GO Candidates GO! The rest of the Democrats in the debate look like “founding fathers” caliber men next to Hillary Criminal (and I usually don’t have a positive thing to say about ANY Democrat except Zell Miller).


21 posted on 11/01/2007 6:43:26 AM PDT by PGalt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 668 - Neighbor of the Beast
The story goes on to report: "The problem is her political baggage: A whopping 49 percent of the public says they have an unfavorable view of Clinton compared to 47 percent who say they hold her in high regard, according to a Gallup Poll survey Aug. 3-5."

So a "whopping" 2% more hold an unfavorable view? For years now this country has been split 50/50. Seems like it would move one way or the other. This partisan crap is getting old. When will people open their eyes and move to the right?

27 posted on 11/01/2007 7:07:15 AM PDT by scan59 (Let consumers dictate market policies. Government just gets in the way.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 668 - Neighbor of the Beast

Frankly, if we drop a butt-kicking on the Dem next November, I’ll be happy no matter who it is, because I think they all need it, both personally and for the best interest of the country. I’ll just be that extra bit happier and more relieved if it’s Hillary.


28 posted on 11/01/2007 7:10:40 AM PDT by RichInOC (Hillary Rodham Clinton is a lying slag.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 668 - Neighbor of the Beast

Have no fear, the game has already been rigged, the Unions and thier cash are already on board...

Nevada and Michigan were moved forward so Hillary WOULD NOT have to run left to win in Iowa and New Hampshire.

Even if she LOSES both states, the Democrat/Union machine is going to hand her The MUCH larger votes of Michigan and Nevada.

Her willing sycophants in the Media, like Chris Matthews will tell us all a-twitter how she has CLEARLY won, and it’s all over but the Convention.

A LOT of time and money has been spent setting up this prcess to ASSSUE that she wins the nomination, because win or lose, a Ton of Democrat Establishment Wonks are going to get FILTHY RICH from the skim from this campaign, and THE GREAT PAYDAY will not be denied tham, this time...

This was written about 2-3 years ago, and it is coming to pass EXACTLY as foretold...


34 posted on 11/01/2007 10:21:03 AM PDT by tcrlaf (You can lead a Liberal to LOGIC, but you can't make it THINK)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 668 - Neighbor of the Beast

Just how will the Repubs get any info about Hillary to the public with the entire MSM running interference for her?


37 posted on 11/01/2007 12:54:37 PM PDT by pabianice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 668 - Neighbor of the Beast

Very very very bad advice. Take Hillary down now - BEFORE she enables a third party candidate (I’m guessing Ron Paul) to be the ‘Ross Perot’ for the general election. She knows she can’t win without a 3rd party candidate that lets her win on a plurality, and that’s part of the plan. Take her down in the primaries, and she won’t have that option.

Qwinn


42 posted on 11/01/2007 9:53:08 PM PDT by Qwinn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson