Skip to comments.
Satellite Photos Show Cleansing of Syrian Site
New York Times ^
| Oct. 25, 2007
Posted on 10/25/2007 2:54:59 PM PDT by waimea.man
New commercial satellite photos show that a Syrian site believed to have been attacked by Israel last month no longer bears any obvious traces of what some analysts said appeared to have been a partly built nuclear reactor.
(Excerpt) Read more at nytimes.com ...
TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: israel; nuclear; sept62007; syria; syriannukes
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-92 next last
To: BubbaBobTX
Click on link in post #11
21
posted on
10/25/2007 3:27:01 PM PDT
by
UCANSEE2
(- Attention all planets of the solar Federation--Secret plan codeword: Banana)
To: lonevoice
The larger red circle looks like the area was caved in by a blast. Notice how it was circular before and much of it is angular now.
Second smaller circle, they created a new road (or is it an air strip), probably to truck out the contaminants.
To: waimea.man
It didn’t take the Syrians long to clean up the remainder of the bombed out building. My suspicion is that they will now claim to the UN that Israel bombed a water purification center.
23
posted on
10/25/2007 3:32:02 PM PDT
by
tobyhill
(The media lies so much the truth is the exception)
To: Blue Highway
Also in the larger red circle the dirt that was to the right of the reactor looks like it was replaced by grey rock of some sort. hmmmmmm. Very interestink
To: waimea.man
I want to see a picture from September 7th
25
posted on
10/25/2007 3:34:57 PM PDT
by
Squidpup
("Fight the Good Fight")
To: lonevoice
I’d prefer to see imagery from Sep 5th and then the 7th......in fact I find it suspicious that we don’t.
To: waimea.man
This is your Nuclear weapons site; and this is your Nuclear weapons site after you pi$$ of Israel.
27
posted on
10/25/2007 3:39:29 PM PDT
by
noname07718
(The Senate is based on consensus. “Consensus is the absence of leadership” - Lady M.Thatcher)
To: waimea.man
To: Squidpup
touche! I was typing when you hit post, LOL
To: Blue Highway
Also in the larger red circle the dirt that was to the right of the reactor looks like it was replaced by grey rock of some sort. hmmmmmm. Very interestink
Actually, it looks like a small hill/rise that was partially removed with frontloaders or bulldozers to provide material to dump into the "hole" that probably existed where the building formerly was. --Garth
To: hophead
There is however, what appears to be a very large hole in the site where the building once stood.
Wouldnt there be a lot of radioactive contamination from some explosive scattered material? Just a question.
31
posted on
10/25/2007 3:43:42 PM PDT
by
noname07718
(The Senate is based on consensus. “Consensus is the absence of leadership” - Lady M.Thatcher)
To: Blue Highway
The areas you have marked in red are not from bomb damage. This is earth material used to cover up the site. Dirt appears to have been moved from two locations you marked to cover up radioactive debris at the building site. The gray area around the site is powdered concrete from the bomb strike that leveled the reactor building.
32
posted on
10/25/2007 3:44:46 PM PDT
by
Mat_Helm
To: Blue Highway
I wonder what the rectangular hole is. The one with the railroad tracks leading up to it?????
To: Blue Highway
The larger red circle is a berm, or whats left of it. To the top right of the circle is a black object inside a crater so to speak. Its in both pictures, pretty much unchanged.
I do not see any other bomb damage. It seems that ONLY the boxy building was hit directly.
The long building at the top of the picture looks the same, no bomb damage. Why was that left standing? Where are the other bombing craters? Something is wrong with this picture!
34
posted on
10/25/2007 3:45:36 PM PDT
by
hophead
(who interupted the lt. gov.)
To: waimea.man
I’d have liked to have seen some immediate post-attack imagery, but that’s probably classified “Top Secret/Deity” so never mind.
35
posted on
10/25/2007 3:48:13 PM PDT
by
ExGeeEye
(I've been waiting since 11/04/79 to do something about Iran.)
To: waimea.man
It’s posts like this with great pictures that lifts my heart and makes me glad that there is a Free Republic and those crazy people that call themselves Freepers.
36
posted on
10/25/2007 3:51:42 PM PDT
by
fish hawk
(The religion of Darwinism = Monkey Intellect)
To: noname07718
“Wouldnt there be a lot of radioactive contamination from some explosive scattered material? Just a question.”
No. It was not an operating reactor. The scale of the picture looks better when you know the “reactor” was about 150’ square. Why was the building at the top of the picture not taken out also?
37
posted on
10/25/2007 3:51:59 PM PDT
by
hophead
(who interupted the lt. gov.)
To: hophead
Because Assad brought it down with shaped charges! /truther
38
posted on
10/25/2007 3:52:08 PM PDT
by
txhurl
(Yes there were WMDs)
To: jeffers
39
posted on
10/25/2007 3:55:44 PM PDT
by
Frank Sheed
(Fr. V. R. Capodanno, Lt, USN, Catholic Chaplain. 3rd/5th, 1st Marine Div., FMF. MOH, posthumously.)
To: Frank Sheed
Curiousity will bring me back.
40
posted on
10/25/2007 3:57:35 PM PDT
by
Broker
(Mabuhay!)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-92 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson