Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Satellite Photos Show Cleansing of Syrian Site
New York Times ^ | Oct. 25, 2007

Posted on 10/25/2007 2:54:59 PM PDT by waimea.man

New commercial satellite photos show that a Syrian site believed to have been attacked by Israel last month no longer bears any obvious traces of what some analysts said appeared to have been a partly built nuclear reactor.

(Excerpt) Read more at nytimes.com ...


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: israel; nuclear; sept62007; syria; syriannukes
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-92 next last
To: BubbaBobTX

Click on link in post #11


21 posted on 10/25/2007 3:27:01 PM PDT by UCANSEE2 (- Attention all planets of the solar Federation--Secret plan codeword: Banana)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: lonevoice

The larger red circle looks like the area was caved in by a blast. Notice how it was circular before and much of it is angular now.

Second smaller circle, they created a new road (or is it an air strip), probably to truck out the contaminants.

22 posted on 10/25/2007 3:31:07 PM PDT by Blue Highway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: waimea.man
It didn’t take the Syrians long to clean up the remainder of the bombed out building. My suspicion is that they will now claim to the UN that Israel bombed a water purification center.
23 posted on 10/25/2007 3:32:02 PM PDT by tobyhill (The media lies so much the truth is the exception)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Blue Highway

Also in the larger red circle the dirt that was to the right of the reactor looks like it was replaced by grey rock of some sort. hmmmmmm. Very interestink


24 posted on 10/25/2007 3:34:38 PM PDT by Blue Highway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: waimea.man

I want to see a picture from September 7th


25 posted on 10/25/2007 3:34:57 PM PDT by Squidpup ("Fight the Good Fight")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lonevoice

I’d prefer to see imagery from Sep 5th and then the 7th......in fact I find it suspicious that we don’t.


26 posted on 10/25/2007 3:35:17 PM PDT by Vn_survivor_67-68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: waimea.man

This is your Nuclear weapons site; and this is your Nuclear weapons site after you pi$$ of Israel.


27 posted on 10/25/2007 3:39:29 PM PDT by noname07718 (The Senate is based on consensus. “Consensus is the absence of leadership” - Lady M.Thatcher)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: waimea.man

ping!


28 posted on 10/25/2007 3:39:29 PM PDT by jonrick46
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Squidpup

touche! I was typing when you hit post, LOL


29 posted on 10/25/2007 3:40:47 PM PDT by Vn_survivor_67-68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Blue Highway
Also in the larger red circle the dirt that was to the right of the reactor looks like it was replaced by grey rock of some sort. hmmmmmm. Very interestink

Actually, it looks like a small hill/rise that was partially removed with frontloaders or bulldozers to provide material to dump into the "hole" that probably existed where the building formerly was. --Garth
30 posted on 10/25/2007 3:41:23 PM PDT by tanknetter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: hophead

There is however, what appears to be a very large hole in the site where the building once stood.

Wouldn’t there be a lot of radioactive contamination from some explosive scattered material? Just a question.


31 posted on 10/25/2007 3:43:42 PM PDT by noname07718 (The Senate is based on consensus. “Consensus is the absence of leadership” - Lady M.Thatcher)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Blue Highway
The areas you have marked in red are not from bomb damage. This is earth material used to cover up the site. Dirt appears to have been moved from two locations you marked to cover up radioactive debris at the building site. The gray area around the site is powdered concrete from the bomb strike that leveled the reactor building.
32 posted on 10/25/2007 3:44:46 PM PDT by Mat_Helm
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Blue Highway

I wonder what the rectangular hole is. The one with the railroad tracks leading up to it?????


33 posted on 10/25/2007 3:45:14 PM PDT by Dr. Bogus Pachysandra ("Don't touch that thing")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Blue Highway

The larger red circle is a berm, or whats left of it. To the top right of the circle is a black object inside a crater so to speak. Its in both pictures, pretty much unchanged.
I do not see any other bomb damage. It seems that ONLY the boxy building was hit directly.
The long building at the top of the picture looks the same, no bomb damage. Why was that left standing? Where are the other bombing craters? Something is wrong with this picture!


34 posted on 10/25/2007 3:45:36 PM PDT by hophead (who interupted the lt. gov.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: waimea.man

I’d have liked to have seen some immediate post-attack imagery, but that’s probably classified “Top Secret/Deity” so never mind.


35 posted on 10/25/2007 3:48:13 PM PDT by ExGeeEye (I've been waiting since 11/04/79 to do something about Iran.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: waimea.man
It’s posts like this with great pictures that lifts my heart and makes me glad that there is a Free Republic and those crazy people that call themselves Freepers.
36 posted on 10/25/2007 3:51:42 PM PDT by fish hawk (The religion of Darwinism = Monkey Intellect)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: noname07718

“Wouldn’t there be a lot of radioactive contamination from some explosive scattered material? Just a question.”

No. It was not an operating reactor. The scale of the picture looks better when you know the “reactor” was about 150’ square. Why was the building at the top of the picture not taken out also?


37 posted on 10/25/2007 3:51:59 PM PDT by hophead (who interupted the lt. gov.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: hophead

Because Assad brought it down with shaped charges! /truther


38 posted on 10/25/2007 3:52:08 PM PDT by txhurl (Yes there were WMDs)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: jeffers

Ping!


39 posted on 10/25/2007 3:55:44 PM PDT by Frank Sheed (Fr. V. R. Capodanno, Lt, USN, Catholic Chaplain. 3rd/5th, 1st Marine Div., FMF. MOH, posthumously.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Frank Sheed

Curiousity will bring me back.


40 posted on 10/25/2007 3:57:35 PM PDT by Broker (Mabuhay!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-92 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson